BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation often causes minor esophageal (ESO) injury, and sometimes lethal posterior left atria (PLA)-ESO fistula. Avoidance techniques (energy reduction and/or complete target avoidance) provide questionable ESO protective value, and are likely associated with increased AF recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: Potential independent mobility, deflectability and age-related anatomic factors, assessed by multi-position, and age-progressive thoracic computed tomography scans, show (1) mobility of the retro-cardiac ESO-PLA juxtaposition, (2) age-related increased thermal ablation vulnerability; and also, age-increased potential for retro-cardiac ESO mobility and deflectability to avoid collateral injury; and that (3) the retro-cardiac vertebral bodies and the descending aorta create a patient-specific esophageal corridor which defines the resting supine esophageal position and the subsequent PLA-ESO crossing points. CONCLUSION: A small, 1-3 mm, increase in separation of the ESO relative to the PLA occurs when moving the patient from supine to lateral and from supine to prone position. Because of the concave spine; the PLA-ESO area of apposition increases. Patient rotation of 90° and 180° does not create enough passive PLA-ESO separation to avoid collateral ESO thermal energy; but, active repositioning lateral and out of ESO corridor appears feasible.
BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation often causes minor esophageal (ESO) injury, and sometimes lethal posterior left atria (PLA)-ESO fistula. Avoidance techniques (energy reduction and/or complete target avoidance) provide questionable ESO protective value, and are likely associated with increased AF recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: Potential independent mobility, deflectability and age-related anatomic factors, assessed by multi-position, and age-progressive thoracic computed tomography scans, show (1) mobility of the retro-cardiac ESO-PLA juxtaposition, (2) age-related increased thermal ablation vulnerability; and also, age-increased potential for retro-cardiac ESO mobility and deflectability to avoid collateral injury; and that (3) the retro-cardiac vertebral bodies and the descending aorta create a patient-specific esophageal corridor which defines the resting supine esophageal position and the subsequent PLA-ESO crossing points. CONCLUSION: A small, 1-3 mm, increase in separation of the ESO relative to the PLA occurs when moving the patient from supine to lateral and from supine to prone position. Because of the concave spine; the PLA-ESO area of apposition increases. Patient rotation of 90° and 180° does not create enough passive PLA-ESO separation to avoid collateral ESO thermal energy; but, active repositioning lateral and out of ESO corridor appears feasible.
Authors: Eric Good; Hakan Oral; Kristina Lemola; Jihn Han; Kamala Tamirisa; Petar Igic; Darryl Elmouchi; David Tschopp; Scott Reich; Aman Chugh; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-11-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: T Jared Bunch; J Peter Weiss; Brian G Crandall; Heidi T May; Tami L Bair; Jeffrey S Osborn; Jeffrey L Anderson; Donald L Lappe; J Brent Muhlestein; Jennifer Nelson; John D Day Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Hans Kottkamp; Christopher Piorkowski; Hildegard Tanner; Richard Kobza; Anja Dorszewski; Petra Schirdewahn; Jin-Hong Gerds-Li; Gerhard Hindricks Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2005-02
Authors: Joyce Meng; Dana C Peters; Jeffrey M Hsing; Michael L Chuang; Jonathan Chan; Airley Fish; Mark E Josephson; Warren J Manning Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Aman Chugh; Joel Rubenstein; Eric Good; Matthew Ebinger; Krit Jongnarangsin; Jackie Fortino; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Hakan Oral; Timothy Nostrant; Fred Morady Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2008-12-07 Impact factor: 6.343