Literature DB >> 21164394

We should abandon randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit.

Jean-Louis Vincent1.   

Abstract

The randomized controlled trial is seen by many as the summit of evidence-based medicine, yet, in the intensive care unit, randomized controlled trials can be challenging to conduct, and results are often difficult to interpret and apply. Many randomized controlled trials in intensive care patients have not demonstrated beneficial effects of the intervention under investigation often despite good preclinical and even previous randomized controlled trial evidence. There are many reasons for these negative results including problems with timing, end point selection, and heterogeneous populations. In this article, we will discuss the limitations of randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit population and highlight the importance of considering other study designs in the challenging intensive care unit environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21164394     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f208ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  46 in total

1.  The effects of advanced monitoring on hemodynamic management in critically ill patients: a pre and post questionnaire study.

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Manu L N G Malbrain; Francisco Javier Belda; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar; Mikhail Kirov; Julia Wendon; Roger Lussmann; Marco Maggiorini
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The Japanese guidelines for the management of sepsis.

Authors:  Shigeto Oda; Mayuki Aibiki; Toshiaki Ikeda; Hitoshi Imaizumi; Shigeatsu Endo; Ryoichi Ochiai; Joji Kotani; Nobuaki Shime; Osamu Nishida; Takayuki Noguchi; Naoyuki Matsuda; Hiroyuki Hirasawa
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 3.  Alternative clinical trial design in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis; Andrew I R Maas; Michael J Souter; Renee H Martin; Randal M Chesnut; Stacia M DeSantis; Gene Sung; Peter D Leroux; Jose I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Outcomes and statistical power in adult critical care randomized trials.

Authors:  Michael O Harhay; Jason Wagner; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Rachel S Bronheim; Anand Gopal; Sydney Green; Elizabeth Cooney; Mark E Mikkelsen; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Dylan S Small; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Lung-Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV-ED): A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial.

Authors:  Brian M Fuller; Ian T Ferguson; Nicholas M Mohr; Anne M Drewry; Christopher Palmer; Brian T Wessman; Enyo Ablordeppey; Jacob Keeperman; Robert J Stephens; Cristopher C Briscoe; Angelina A Kolomiets; Richard S Hotchkiss; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 6.  SAHIT Investigators--on the outcome of some subarachnoid hemorrhage clinical trials.

Authors:  R Loch Macdonald; Blessing Jaja; Michael D Cusimano; Nima Etminan; Daniel Hanggi; David Hasan; Don Ilodigwe; Hector Lantigua; Peter Le Roux; Benjamin Lo; Ada Louffat-Olivares; Stephan Mayer; Andrew Molyneux; Audrey Quinn; Tom A Schweizer; Thomas Schenk; Julian Spears; Michael Todd; James Torner; Mervyn D I Vergouwen; George K C Wong; Jeff Singh
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 6.829

7.  Is the literature inconclusive about the harm from HES? Yes.

Authors:  Christian Ertmer; Djillali Annane; Philippe Van Der Linden
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Timing Is Everything. The Importance of Alignment of Time Anchors for Observational Causal Inference Research.

Authors:  Stephanie Parks Taylor; Marc A Kowalkowski; Andrew J Admon
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-05

9.  A prospective registry of emergency department patients admitted with infection.

Authors:  Julian M Williams; Jaimi H Greenslade; Juliet V McKenzie; Kevin H Chu; Anthony F T Brown; David Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Paediatric community-acquired septic shock: results from the REPEM network study.

Authors:  P Van de Voorde; B Emerson; B Gomez; J Willems; D Yildizdas; I Iglowstein; E Kerkhof; N Mullen; C R Pinto; T Detaille; N Qureshi; J Naud; J De Dooy; R Van Lancker; A Dupont; N Boelsma; M Mor; D Walker; M Sabbe; S Hachimi-Idrissi; L Da Dalt; H Waisman; D Biarent; I Maconochie; H Moll; J Benito
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.