Literature DB >> 21164377

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cerebral cavernous malformations with susceptibility-weighted imaging.

Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur1, Christophe Langlois, William J Ankenbrandt, Emmanuelle Le Bars, Marie Anne Leroy, Hugues Duffau, Alain Bonafé, Jennifer Jaffe, Issam A Awad, Pierre Labauge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) can be sporadic or inherited, the latter characterized by multiple lesions. Novel imaging sequences have increased the sensitivity of detecting multiple CCMs.
OBJECTIVE: To compare T2-weighted gradient echo (T2*GRE) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequences in familial and sporadic CCM to assess their respective sensitivity.
METHODS: This prospective study included 23 consecutive cases grouped as multifocal/familial CCMs (n=14), solitary/clustered sporadic CCMs with developmental venous anomaly (n=8), and postirradiation CCMs (n=1). Brain magnetic resonance imaging included T2*GRE and SWI sequences. Two radiologists independently counted the number of lesions on each sequence. The difference in the number of lesions on both sequences was compared, and interobserver agreement was evaluated.
RESULTS: In multifocal/familial cases, a mean of 34.7 lesions were detected on T2*GRE and 66.9 on SWI (P=.001). The difference of lesion prevalence with the 2 techniques was significant (P=.006), with strong interobserver correlation for the T2*GRE sequence (P<.001) and SWI sequence (P<.001). Patients with solitary/clustered sporadic CCMs, including those associated with venous anomaly, had no difference in lesion prevalence in the 2 sequences.
CONCLUSION: SWI is more sensitive than T2*GRE in detecting CCM in multifocal/familial CCMs. Among cases classified as solitary/clustered with conventional imaging, including those associated with venous anomaly, the SWI did not impart additional sensitivity or reveal occult lesions not evident on T2*GRE sequence. No case was changed from the solitary/clustered to the multifocal clinical category because of SWI. Copyright (C) by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21164377     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820773cf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  27 in total

1.  Pediatric holohemispheric developmental venous anomaly: definitive characterization by 3D susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Michael A Casey; Sourabh Lahoti; Ajeet Gordhan
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2011-05-01

2.  The value of susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of patients with familial cerebral cavernous angioma.

Authors:  Haci Taner Bulut; Mehmet Akif Sarica; Ali Haydar Baykan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 3.  Cavernous angiomas: deconstructing a neurosurgical disease.

Authors:  Issam A Awad; Sean P Polster
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Case report: glioblastoma multiforme complicating familial cavernous malformations.

Authors:  D M Wilson; B Cohen; K Keshari; H Vogel; G Steinberg; W Dillon
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Remote brain microhaemorrhages may predict haematoma in glioma patients treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; Frédérique Charbonneau; Dimitri Psimaras; Marie-Astrid Metten; Antoine Gueguen; Khe Hoang Xuan; Loic Feuvret; Julien Savatovsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Can developmental venous anomalies cause seizures?

Authors:  Claire Dussaule; Pascal Masnou; Ghaïdaa Nasser; Frédérique Archambaud; Cécile Cauquil-Michon; Jean-Paul Gagnepain; Viviane Bouilleret; Christian Denier
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Vascular permeability and iron deposition biomarkers in longitudinal follow-up of cerebral cavernous malformations.

Authors:  Romuald Girard; Maged D Fam; Hussein A Zeineddine; Huan Tan; Abdul Ghani Mikati; Changbin Shi; Michael Jesselson; Robert Shenkar; Meijing Wu; Ying Cao; Nicholas Hobson; Henrik B W Larsson; Gregory A Christoforidis; Issam A Awad
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain.

Authors:  Chunlei Liu; Wei Li; Karen A Tong; Kristen W Yeom; Samuel Kuzminski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  PDCD10 (CCM3) regulates brain endothelial barrier integrity in cerebral cavernous malformation type 3: role of CCM3-ERK1/2-cortactin cross-talk.

Authors:  Svetlana M Stamatovic; Nikola Sladojevic; Richard F Keep; Anuska V Andjelkovic
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 17.088

10.  Parenchymal hypointense foci associated with developmental venous anomalies: evaluation by phase-sensitive MR Imaging at 3T.

Authors:  M Takasugi; S Fujii; Y Shinohara; T Kaminou; T Watanabe; T Ogawa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.