Literature DB >> 21164121

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in aphasic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Nora Weiduschat1, Alexander Thiel, Ilona Rubi-Fessen, Alexander Hartmann, Josef Kessler, Patrick Merl, Lutz Kracht, Thomas Rommel, Wolf Dieter Heiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although functional imaging studies suggest that recruitment of contralesional areas hinders optimal functional reorganization in patients with aphasic stroke, only limited evidence is available on the efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation aimed at suppression of contralateral overactivation.
METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, blinded pilot study, the effect of 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over right-hemispheric Broca homolog in subjects with poststroke aphasia in the subacute stage was examined. According to their group allocation, patients received, in addition to conventional speech and language therapy, multiple sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation either over the right-hemispheric inferior frontal gyrus (intervention group) or over the vertex (control group). The primary outcome parameter was the change in laterality indices as quantified by activation positron emission tomography before and after the 2-week intervention period. The clinical efficacy was evaluated with the Aachen Aphasia Test.
RESULTS: At baseline, no group differences were discovered for age, laterality indices, or mean Aachen Aphasia Test scores. Four patients were lost to follow-up, but none due to side effects of the transcranial magnetic stimulation. Positron emission tomography revealed an activation shift toward the right hemisphere in the control group (P=0.0165), which was absent in the intervention group. Furthermore, the latter improved significantly clinically by a mean of 19.8 points in the Aachen Aphasia Test total score (P=0.002), whereas the control group did not. There was however no clear linear relationship between the extent of laterality shift and clinical improvement (r=0.193, P=nonsignificant).
CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation might be an effective, safe, and feasible complementary therapy for poststroke aphasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21164121     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  45 in total

Review 1.  Brain Stimulation and the Role of the Right Hemisphere in Aphasia Recovery.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Guest editorial: Opportunities in rehabilitation research.

Authors:  Alexander K Ommaya; Kenneth M Adams; Richard M Allman; Eileen G Collins; Rory A Cooper; C Edward Dixon; Paul S Fishman; James A Henry; Randy Kardon; Robert D Kerns; Joel Kupersmith; Albert Lo; Richard Macko; Rachel McArdle; Regina E McGlinchey; Malcolm R McNeil; Thomas P O'Toole; P Hunter Peckham; Mark H Tuszynski; Stephen G Waxman; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Rehabilitation--emerging technologies, innovative therapies, and future objectives.

Authors:  Nneka L Ifejika-Jones; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and aphasia rehabilitation.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Michael Ho; Ethan Treglia; Elina Kaplan; Shahid Bashir; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  TMS suppression of right pars triangularis, but not pars opercularis, improves naming in aphasia.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Hugo Theoret; Masahito Kobayashi; Felipe Fregni; Marjorie Nicholas; Jose M Tormos; Megan S Steven; Errol H Baker; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation elicits rate-dependent brain network responses in non-human primates.

Authors:  Felipe S Salinas; Shalini Narayana; Wei Zhang; Peter T Fox; C Ákos Szabó
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Elena Barbieri; Jennifer Mack; Brianne Chiappetta; Eduardo Europa; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 8.  Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Roy H Hamilton; Evangelia G Chrysikou; Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Impairment and Functional Interventions for Aphasia: Having it All.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Galletta; A M Barrett
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2014-06-01

10.  Finding the Right Words: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Discourse Productivity in Non-fluent Aphasia After Stroke.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Catherine Norise; Olufunsho Faseyitan; H Branch Coslett; Peter E Turkeltaub; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.