Marc de Perrot1, Karen McRae2, Yaron Shargall2, John Thenganatt2, Jakov Moric2, Suzanna Mak2, John T Granton2. 1. Toronto Pulmonary Endarterectomy Program, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: marc.deperrot@uhn.on.ca. 2. Toronto Pulmonary Endarterectomy Program, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite a major reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) do not always return to functional New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). We hypothesized that residual abnormal compliance (Cp) after PEA is associated with incomplete functional recovery despite major improvement in PVR. METHODS: The Cp of 34 consecutive patients with CTEPH was assessed before and after PEA. Cp was defined as stroke volume over pulse pressure and was divided into three groups: < 2.0 mL/mm Hg, 2.0 to 3.9 mL/mm Hg, and ≥ 4 mL/mm Hg. To establish predicted Cp after PEA, we collected an age- and gender-matched control group. RESULTS: Before PEA, Cp was < 2.0 mL/mm Hg in 82% (n = 28) of the patients. After PEA, Cp improved to 2.0 to 3.9 mL/mm Hg in 11 patients and to ≥ 4.0 mL/mm Hg in 14 patients. Residual Cp < 2.0 mL/mm Hg was associated with delayed extubation and prolonged hospital stay. At 3 months' follow-up, 13 patients (93%) with postoperative Cp ≥ 4.0 mL/mm Hg returned to NYHA class I, whereas 45% with Cp of 2.0 to 3.9 mL/mm Hg and 25% with Cp < 2.0 mL/mm Hg returned to NYHA class I. In multivariate analysis, postoperative Cp ≥ 4.0 mL/mm Hg was the only predictor of functional recovery to NYHA class I. The group of patients with postoperative Cp ≥ 4.0 mL/mm Hg was also the only group to achieve hemodynamic parameters similar to those of their matched control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative Cp is an important predictor of recovery after PEA. Residual vascular stiffness after PEA can be associated with persistent functional limitation and lack of complete remodeling of the right ventricle.
BACKGROUND: Despite a major reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) do not always return to functional New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). We hypothesized that residual abnormal compliance (Cp) after PEA is associated with incomplete functional recovery despite major improvement in PVR. METHODS: The Cp of 34 consecutive patients with CTEPH was assessed before and after PEA. Cp was defined as stroke volume over pulse pressure and was divided into three groups: < 2.0 mL/mm Hg, 2.0 to 3.9 mL/mm Hg, and ≥ 4 mL/mm Hg. To establish predicted Cp after PEA, we collected an age- and gender-matched control group. RESULTS: Before PEA, Cp was < 2.0 mL/mm Hg in 82% (n = 28) of the patients. After PEA, Cp improved to 2.0 to 3.9 mL/mm Hg in 11 patients and to ≥ 4.0 mL/mm Hg in 14 patients. Residual Cp < 2.0 mL/mm Hg was associated with delayed extubation and prolonged hospital stay. At 3 months' follow-up, 13 patients (93%) with postoperative Cp ≥ 4.0 mL/mm Hg returned to NYHA class I, whereas 45% with Cp of 2.0 to 3.9 mL/mm Hg and 25% with Cp < 2.0 mL/mm Hg returned to NYHA class I. In multivariate analysis, postoperative Cp ≥ 4.0 mL/mm Hg was the only predictor of functional recovery to NYHA class I. The group of patients with postoperative Cp ≥ 4.0 mL/mm Hg was also the only group to achieve hemodynamic parameters similar to those of their matched control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative Cp is an important predictor of recovery after PEA. Residual vascular stiffness after PEA can be associated with persistent functional limitation and lack of complete remodeling of the right ventricle.
Authors: Junjing Su; Alun D Hughes; Ulf Simonsen; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Kim H Parker; Luke S Howard; Soren Mellemkjaer Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Robert V MacKenzie Ross; Mark R Toshner; Elaine Soon; Robert Naeije; Joanna Pepke-Zaba Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Matthias Dupont; Wilfried Mullens; Hadi N Skouri; Zuheir Abrahams; Yuping Wu; David O Taylor; Randall C Starling; W H Wilson Tang Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Sarah K Medrek; Chad Kloefkorn; Duc T M Nguyen; Edward A Graviss; Adaani E Frost; Zeenat Safdar Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 3.017