Literature DB >> 21162705

Analysis of reverse total shoulder joint forces and glenoid fixation.

Young W Kwon1, Rachel E Forman, Peter S Walker, Joseph D Zuckerman.   

Abstract

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) implants are intended to restore stability and function to shoulders with rotator cuff deficiency. The implant consists of a glenosphere projecting from a glenoid baseplate and articulating in a socket at the proximal end of a humeral component. Despite the demonstrated clinical efficacy, little information is available regarding the joint forces about this construct and the stability of the glenoid component against these forces. Our hypotheses were that the joint forces about the rTSA were comparable to that about a normal shoulder joint, and that the micromotion between the baseplate and the scapula against these loads would be sufficiently low to induce bone ingrowth. To investigate this, a custom testing rig was constructed to simulate active shoulder elevation in fresh-frozen shoulder specimens. The forces about the rTSA were calculated and found to include compressive and shear forces up to 0.7 and 0.4 BW, respectively. In contrast to a normal shoulder, where the joint forces peak at 90° of abduction, forces about the rTSA were highest at about 60° of abduction. These forces were then applied in cyclic loading conditions to the glenoid baseplate, and the micromotion of the implant relative to the bone was measured in the four quadrants of the component. For two different rTSA designs (DePuy Delta III® and Encore RSP®) and in the entire range of the fixation testing, the cyclical micromotions were always less than 62 µm. Thus, under loading conditions similar to physiological shoulder elevation, micromotion of the glenoid component was sufficiently low and within previously published limits to induce bone ingrowth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21162705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis        ISSN: 1936-9719


  6 in total

1.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: research models.

Authors:  Stefano Petrillo; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Alessandra Berton; Andreas Kontaxis; Timothy Wright; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

2.  Assessment of Embedded Conjugated Polymer Sensor Arrays for Potential Load Transmission Measurement in Orthopaedic Implants.

Authors:  Carolina Micolini; Frederick Benjamin Holness; James A Johnson; Aaron David Price
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Glenoid baseplate fixation using hybrid configurations of locked and unlocked peripheral screws.

Authors:  Nathan T Formaini; Nathan G Everding; Jonathan C Levy; Brandon G Santoni; Aniruddh N Nayak; Cooper Wilson
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-11

4.  Influence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate design on torque and compression relationship.

Authors:  Miguel A Diaz; Jason E Hsu; Eric T Ricchetti; Grant E Garrigues; Sergio Gutierrez; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Baseplate Stability in Superior Bone Loss With Augmented Implant.

Authors:  Elise J Martin; Thomas R Duquin; Mark T Ehrensberger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-06-13

6.  An in vitro study comparing limited to full cementation of polyethylene glenoid components.

Authors:  R Andrew Glennie; Joshua W Giles; James A Johnson; George S Athwal; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.