Literature DB >> 21162666

Machine-learning-based coadaptive calibration for brain-computer interfaces.

Carmen Vidaurre1, Claudia Sannelli, Klaus-Robert Müller, Benjamin Blankertz.   

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) allow users to control a computer application by brain activity as acquired (e.g., by EEG). In our classic machine learning approach to BCIs, the participants undertake a calibration measurement without feedback to acquire data to train the BCI system. After the training, the user can control a BCI and improve the operation through some type of feedback. However, not all BCI users are able to perform sufficiently well during feedback operation. In fact, a nonnegligible portion of participants (estimated 15%-30%) cannot control the system (a BCI illiteracy problem, generic to all motor-imagery-based BCIs). We hypothesize that one main difficulty for a BCI user is the transition from offline calibration to online feedback. In this work, we investigate adaptive machine learning methods to eliminate offline calibration and analyze the performance of 11 volunteers in a BCI based on the modulation of sensorimotor rhythms. We present an adaptation scheme that individually guides the user. It starts with a subject-independent classifier that evolves to a subject-optimized state-of-the-art classifier within one session while the user interacts continuously. These initial runs use supervised techniques for robust coadaptive learning of user and machine. Subsequent runs use unsupervised adaptation to track the features' drift during the session and provide an unbiased measure of BCI performance. Using this approach, without any offline calibration, six users, including one novice, obtained good performance after 3 to 6 minutes of adaptation. More important, this novel guided learning also allows participants with BCI illiteracy to gain significant control with the BCI in less than 60 minutes. In addition, one volunteer without sensorimotor idle rhythm peak at the beginning of the BCI experiment developed it during the course of the session and used voluntary modulation of its amplitude to control the feedback application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21162666     DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  31 in total

Review 1.  Brain computer interfaces, a review.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Nicolas-Alonso; Jaime Gomez-Gil
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Distributed cortical adaptation during learning of a brain-computer interface task.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Wander; Timothy Blakely; Kai J Miller; Kurt E Weaver; Lise A Johnson; Jared D Olson; Eberhard E Fetz; Rajesh P N Rao; Jeffrey G Ojemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Brain-computer interfaces: a powerful tool for scientific inquiry.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Wander; Rajesh P N Rao
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Unsupervised adaptation of brain-machine interface decoders.

Authors:  Tayfun Gürel; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Online adaptation of a c-VEP Brain-computer Interface(BCI) based on error-related potentials and unsupervised learning.

Authors:  Martin Spüler; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Martin Bogdan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  First Steps Toward a Motor Imagery Based Stroke BCI: New Strategy to Set up a Classifier.

Authors:  Vera Kaiser; Alex Kreilinger; Gernot R Müller-Putz; Christa Neuper
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Brain-computer interfacing using modulations of alpha activity induced by covert shifts of attention.

Authors:  Matthias S Treder; Ali Bahramisharif; Nico M Schmidt; Marcel A J van Gerven; Benjamin Blankertz
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Selective sensation based brain-computer interface via mechanical vibrotactile stimulation.

Authors:  Lin Yao; Jianjun Meng; Dingguo Zhang; Xinjun Sheng; Xiangyang Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous Brain-Computer Interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design.

Authors:  Fabien Lotte; Florian Larrue; Christian Mühl
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Using reinforcement learning to provide stable brain-machine interface control despite neural input reorganization.

Authors:  Eric A Pohlmeyer; Babak Mahmoudi; Shijia Geng; Noeline W Prins; Justin C Sanchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.