Literature DB >> 21162514

Clinical and radiological outcomes of axial lumbar interbody fusion.

Suresh S Patil1, Emily M Lindley, Vikas V Patel, Evalina L Burger.   

Abstract

Axial lumbar interbody fusion is a novel percutaneous alternative to common open techniques, such as anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. This minimally invasive technique uses the presacral space to access the L5-S1 and L4-L5 disk space. The goal of this study was to examine outcomes following axial lumbar interbody fusion. The charts of all patients who underwent axial lumbar interbody fusion surgery at our institution between 2006 and 2008 were reviewed. Clinical outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographs were also evaluated for disk space height, L4-L5 and/or L5-S1 Cobb angle, and fusion. Of the 50 patients (32 women, 18 men; mean age, 49.29 years) treated with axial lumbar interbody fusion, 48 had preoperative VAS scores and 16 had preoperative ODI scores available. Complete radiographic data were available at the preoperative, initial postoperative, and final postoperative time points for 46 patients (92%). At last follow-up (average, 12 months), ODI scores were reduced from 46 to 22, and VAS scores were lowered from 8.1 to 3.6. Of the 49 patients with postoperative radiographs, 47 (96%) went on to a solid fusion. There were no significant differences between pre- and postoperative disk space height and lumbar lordosis angle. The most common complications were superficial infection and pseudoarthrosis. Other complications were rectal injury, hematoma, and irritation of a nerve root by a screw. Overall, we found the axial lumbar interbody fusion procedure in combination with pedicle screw placement to have good clinical and radiological outcomes. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21162514     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20101021-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  8 in total

Review 1.  Axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) approach for adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Woojin Cho; Akilah B King
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive transaxial lumbosacral interbody fusion: a ten year single-centre experience.

Authors:  Dick J Zeilstra; Victor E Staartjes; Marc L Schröder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Minimally invasive trans-sacral approach to L5-S1 interbody fusion: Preliminary results from 1 center and review of the literature.

Authors:  W Daniel Bradley; Michael S Hisey; Sunita Verma-Kurvari; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

4.  Evaluating rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery (REFS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  James Greenwood; Alison McGregor; Fiona Jones; Michael Hurley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  An in vivo kinematic comparison of dynamic lumbar stabilization to lumbar discectomy and posterior lumbar fusion using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Soo-An Park; Amir H Fayyazi; Kenneth S Yonemura; Bruce E Fredrickson; Nathaniel R Ordway
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

Review 6.  Recent Advances in Technique and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in Adult Scoliosis.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Sen Liu; Yu-Zhi Zuo; Qi-Yi Li; Zhi-Hong Wu; Nan Wu; Ke-Yi Yu; Gui-Xing Qiu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Clinical and Radiologic Fate of the Lumbosacral Junction After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the Bottom of a Long Construct in CMIS Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Alisa Alayan; Jason Cohen; Ryan Cohen; Babak Khandehroo
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2018-10-23

8.  Axial lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Dick J Zeilstra; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 4.458

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.