Literature DB >> 21161681

The diastolic stress test: a new approach to an old problem.

Kamran A Shaikh1, Miguel A Quinones.   

Abstract

The evaluation of ischemic heart disease is the cornerstone of clinical Cardiology. Although there are many means of ischemic evaluation, all are with their own limitations. While perfusion-based studies are highly sensitive, they lack specificity. Conversely, systolic wall motion analysis with echocardiography tends to have high specificity; however, the sensitivity may be limited by short duration of systolic abnormalities when present. With the advent of Doppler echocardiography, and more specifically tissue Doppler imaging, and strain and strain rate imaging, a more comprehensive evaluation of the left ventricular function is available, including diastole. Diastolic abnormalities in the setting of ischemia are now being studied using these new parameters and have been suggested as a reliable marker of ischemia. Exercise-induced abnormalities in diastolic parameters have improved sensitivities and specificities over traditional stress testing and persist longer than systolic abnormalities. A review of the medical literature regarding the subject will be discussed here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21161681     DOI: 10.1007/s10741-010-9217-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Fail Rev        ISSN: 1382-4147            Impact factor:   4.214


  61 in total

Review 1.  Quantification in cardiac MRI.

Authors:  R J van der Geest; J H Reiber
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Multi-modality imaging of diastolic function.

Authors:  Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  The value of 2D strain imaging during stress testing.

Authors:  Marie Moonen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Dimitrios Zacharakis; Luc Pierard
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 4.  Strain imaging in echocardiography: methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Gillian C Nesbitt; Sunil Mankad; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Prognostic value of pulse-wave tissue Doppler parameters in patients with systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Jens M Olson; Bassem A Samad; Mahbubul Alam
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Stress echocardiography in the evaluation of chest pain and accuracy in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  P A Pellikka
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.194

7.  Doppler-derived left ventricular filling pressures and the regulation of heart rate recovery after exercise in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Stanislaw J Skaluba; Sheldon E Litwin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Diastolic dysfunction: improved understanding using emerging imaging techniques.

Authors:  Daniel Daneshvar; Janet Wei; Kirsten Tolstrup; Louise E J Thomson; Chrisandra Shufelt; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Detection of diastolic abnormality by dyssynchrony imaging: correlation with coronary artery disease in patients presenting with visibly normal wall motion.

Authors:  Toshinari Onishi; Masaaki Uematsu; Shinsuke Nanto; Takakazu Morozumi; Tetsuya Watanabe; Masaki Awata; Osamu Iida; Fusako Sera; Seiki Nagata
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 10.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence.

Authors:  S R Underwood; C Anagnostopoulos; M Cerqueira; P J Ell; E J Flint; M Harbinson; A D Kelion; A Al-Mohammad; E M Prvulovich; L J Shaw; A C Tweddel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.