PURPOSE: To investigate variations in expression of the monocyte antigen presentation molecule HLA-DR in cirrhosis. METHODS: HLA-DR expression was measured by flow cytometry in 100 patients within 48 h of admission and repeated a week later in 21 patients admitted to ICU. IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ secretion in response to lipopolysaccharide and recall antigens were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay in 12 patients (7 with clinical immunoparesis, 5 stable). RESULTS: HLA-DR level was 71% in stable patients, 53% with single organ dysfunction and 34% with multiple organ failure (p < 0.02). Within these groups, no significant differences in admission HLA-DR were seen between survivors and non-survivors. HLA-DR expression less than 40% predicted 90-day mortality with a specificity of 80% and sensitivity of 59% [area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) 0.76]. HLA-DR less than 40% was an independent predictor of prognosis in multivariate analysis with a relative risk of 2.35 (p = 0.04), although sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) score displaced HLA-DR when included. In those admitted to intensive care failure to increase HLA-DR expression was predictive of death within 30 days (risk ratio 6.9, p = 0.007). Follow-up values predicted outcome with similar accuracy to acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II)/SOFA scores (AUROC 0.88). Response to endotoxin and recall antigen was characterised by an anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion profile, and was associated with impairment in recall antigen presentation capacity. CONCLUSIONS: HLA-DR expression less than 40% and a failure of recovery predict poor outcome in decompensated cirrhosis, but overall prognostic power remains inferior to conventional markers. Ex vivo experiments demonstrate reduced Th1 response to antigenic stimulation and an exaggerated counter-inflammatory cytokine secretion profile.
PURPOSE: To investigate variations in expression of the monocyte antigen presentation molecule HLA-DR in cirrhosis. METHODS: HLA-DR expression was measured by flow cytometry in 100 patients within 48 h of admission and repeated a week later in 21 patients admitted to ICU. IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ secretion in response to lipopolysaccharide and recall antigens were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay in 12 patients (7 with clinical immunoparesis, 5 stable). RESULTS: HLA-DR level was 71% in stable patients, 53% with single organ dysfunction and 34% with multiple organ failure (p < 0.02). Within these groups, no significant differences in admission HLA-DR were seen between survivors and non-survivors. HLA-DR expression less than 40% predicted 90-day mortality with a specificity of 80% and sensitivity of 59% [area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) 0.76]. HLA-DR less than 40% was an independent predictor of prognosis in multivariate analysis with a relative risk of 2.35 (p = 0.04), although sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) score displaced HLA-DR when included. In those admitted to intensive care failure to increase HLA-DR expression was predictive of death within 30 days (risk ratio 6.9, p = 0.007). Follow-up values predicted outcome with similar accuracy to acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II)/SOFA scores (AUROC 0.88). Response to endotoxin and recall antigen was characterised by an anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion profile, and was associated with impairment in recall antigen presentation capacity. CONCLUSIONS: HLA-DR expression less than 40% and a failure of recovery predict poor outcome in decompensated cirrhosis, but overall prognostic power remains inferior to conventional markers. Ex vivo experiments demonstrate reduced Th1 response to antigenic stimulation and an exaggerated counter-inflammatory cytokine secretion profile.
Authors: Evangelos Cholongitas; Alex Betrosian; Marco Senzolo; Steve Shaw; David Patch; Pinelopi Manousou; James O'Beirne; Andrew K Burroughs Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2007-12-13 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Klaus Tschaikowsky; Monika Hedwig-Geissing; Albert Schiele; Frank Bremer; Michael Schywalsky; Jürgen Schüttler Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marie-Luise Berres; Barbara Schnyder; Eray Yagmur; Brett Inglis; Sven Stanzel; Jens J W Tischendorf; Alexander Koch; Ron Winograd; Christian Trautwein; Hermann E Wasmuth Journal: Liver Int Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Phillip B Hylemon; Jason M Ridlon; Douglas M Heuman; Kalyani Daita; Melanie B White; Pamela Monteith; Nicole A Noble; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Patrick M Gillevet Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: María Martínez-Esparza; María Tristán-Manzano; Antonio J Ruiz-Alcaraz; Pilar García-Peñarrubia Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 5.742