Literature DB >> 21159415

Do biological measures mediate the relationship between education and health: A comparative study.

Noreen Goldman1, Cassio M Turra, Luis Rosero-Bixby, David Weir, Eileen Crimmins.   

Abstract

Despite a myriad of studies examining the relationship between socioeconomic status and health outcomes, few have assessed the extent to which biological markers of chronic disease account for social disparities in health. Studies that have examined this issue have generally been based on surveys in wealthy countries that include a small set of clinical markers of cardiovascular disease. The availability of recent data from nationally representative surveys of older adults in Costa Rica and Taiwan that collected a rich set of biomarkers comparable to those in a recent US survey permits us to explore these associations across diverse populations. Similar regression models were estimated on three data sets - the Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study in Taiwan, the Costa Rican Study on Longevity and Healthy Aging, and the Health and Retirement Study in the USA - in order to assess (1) the strength of the associations between educational attainment and a broad range of biomarkers; and (2) the extent to which these biomarkers account for the relationships between education and two measures of health status (self-rated health, functional limitations) in older populations. The estimates suggest non-systematic and weak associations between education and high risk biomarker values in Taiwan and Costa Rica, in contrast to generally negative and significant associations in the US, especially among women. The results also reveal negligible or modest contributions of the biomarkers to educational disparities in the health outcomes. The findings are generally consistent with previous research suggesting stronger associations between socioeconomic status and health in wealthy countries than in middle-income countries and may reflect higher levels of social stratification in the US. With access to an increasing number of longitudinal biosocial surveys, researchers may be better able to distinguish true variations in the relationship between socioeconomic status and health across different settings from methodological differences. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159415      PMCID: PMC3039215          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  54 in total

1.  Self-rated health showed a graded association with frequently used biomarkers in a large population sample.

Authors:  Marja Jylhä; Stefano Volpato; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England.

Authors:  James Banks; Michael Marmot; Zoe Oldfield; James P Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Socioeconomic status as an independent predictor of physiological biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: evidence from NHANES.

Authors:  Peter Muennig; Nancy Sohler; Bisundev Mahato
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Income disparities in body mass index and obesity in the United States, 1971-2002.

Authors:  Virginia W Chang; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-10-10

5.  Prospective measurements of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in a cohort of elderly subjects: relationship to gender, subjective health, smoking habits, and 10-year mortality.

Authors:  L Mazat; S Lafont; C Berr; B Debuire; J F Tessier; J F Dartigues; E E Baulieu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Is there a biomedical explanation for socioeconomic differences in incident mobility limitation?

Authors:  Annemarie Koster; Brenda W J H Penninx; Hans Bosma; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Tamara B Harris; Anne B Newman; Ronica N Rooks; Susan M Rubin; Eleanor M Simonsick; Jacques T M van Eijk; Stephen B Kritchevsky
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Socioeconomic status and trends in disparities in 4 major risk factors for cardiovascular disease among US adults, 1971-2002.

Authors:  Sanjat Kanjilal; Edward W Gregg; Yiling J Cheng; Ping Zhang; David E Nelson; George Mensah; Gloria L A Beckles
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-27

8.  Socioeconomic inequality of obesity in the United States: do gender, age, and ethnicity matter?

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  M Bobak; C Hertzman; Z Skodova; M Marmot
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Differences in the association of cardiovascular risk factors with education: a comparison of Costa Rica (CRELES) and the USA (NHANES).

Authors:  David H Rehkopf; William H Dow; Luis Rosero-Bixby
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  14 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and incident cardiovascular disease in a developing country: findings from the Isfahan cohort study (ICS).

Authors:  Farzad Masoudkabir; Nafiseh Toghianifar; Mohammad Talaie; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Nooshin Mohammadifard; Tom Marshall; G Neil Thomas
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Cohort Profile: The Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study (SEBAS) in Taiwan.

Authors:  Jennifer C Cornman; Dana A Glei; Noreen Goldman; Ming-Cheng Chang; Hui-Sheng Lin; Yi-Li Chuang; Baai-Shyun Hurng; Yu-Hsuan Lin; Shu-Hui Lin; I-Wen Liu; Hsia-Yuan Liu; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Patterns of SES Health Disparities Among Older Adults in Three Upper Middle- and Two High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Mary McEniry; Rafael Samper-Ternent; Carmen Elisa Flórez; Renata Pardo; Carlos Cano-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Validation of blood-based assays using dried blood spots for use in large population studies.

Authors:  Eileen Crimmins; Jung Ki Kim; Heather McCreath; Jessica Faul; David Weir; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2014

5.  To what extent do biomarkers account for the large social disparities in health in Moscow?

Authors:  Dana A Glei; Noreen Goldman; Vladimir M Shkolnikov; Dmitri Jdanov; Svetlana Shalnova; Maria Shkolnikova; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Socioeconomic status and biological markers of health: an examination of adults in the United States and Taiwan.

Authors:  Jennifer C Cornman; Dana A Glei; Noreen Goldman; Carol D Ryff; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2014-06-27

7.  Predicting mortality with biomarkers: a population-based prospective cohort study for elderly Costa Ricans.

Authors:  Luis Rosero-Bixby; William H Dow
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2012-06-13

8.  Sheepskin effects of education in the 10-year Framingham risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Sze Yan Liu; Stephen L Buka; Laura D Kubzansky; Ichiro Kawachi; Stephen E Gilman; Eric B Loucks
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Serum Albumin Levels and Economic Status in Japanese Older Adults.

Authors:  Asami Ota; Naoki Kondo; Nobuko Murayama; Naohito Tanabe; Yugo Shobugawa; Katsunori Kondo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Association of blood lipids, creatinine, albumin, and CRP with socioeconomic status in Malawi.

Authors:  Iliana V Kohler; Beth J Soldo; Philip Anglewicz; Ben Chilima; Hans-Peter Kohler
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.