Literature DB >> 21159127

A parallel open-label trial to evaluate microbial cellulose wound dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Douglas R Solway1, William A Clark, Dennis J Levinson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) using either a microbial cellulose (MC) wound dressing or Xeroform™ Petrolatum gauze. In a parallel, open-label trial in which the primary outcome was the rate of wound healing and the time to wound closure, 15 ulcers in type II diabetic patients received an MC dressing. Wounds in 19 control patients with type II diabetes were treated with a Xeroform gauze dressing. All wounds were non infected, Wagner stage II or III and received standard care including debridement, non weight bearing limb support and weekly wound evaluation. The mean time to heal in the MC (±SE) treated group was 32 days ± 2.5 and for controls it was 48 days ± 4.7 (P < 0.01). The rate of weekly wound closure (mean ± SE) was 1.7 times faster in the MC-treated group (cellulose treated, -5.04% per week ± 0.38 versus control, -2.93% per week ± 0.19), (P < 0.001). Among covariants tested by univariate regression, only the original wound area correlated with the time to wound closure (P < 0.001). In conclusion, with the provision of current standards of care, the application of an MC dressing to a diabetic ulcer may enhance the rate of wound healing and shorten the time course of epithelisation.
© 2010 The Authors. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159127      PMCID: PMC7950783          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00750.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  16 in total

1.  Wound healing trajectories as predictors of effectiveness of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  M C Robson; D P Hill; M E Woodske; D L Steed
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-07

Review 2.  Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria.

Authors:  P Ross; R Mayer; M Benziman
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-03

Review 3.  The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications.

Authors:  Wojciech K Czaja; David J Young; Marek Kawecki; R Malcolm Brown
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  Microbial cellulose wound dressing in the treatment of skin tears in the frail elderly.

Authors:  Douglas R Solway; Mauricio Consalter; Dennis J Levinson
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.546

Review 5.  A review of the literature on topical therapies for diabetic foot ulcers. Part 2: Advanced treatments.

Authors:  R White; C McIntosh
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  Microbial cellulose wound dressing in the treatment of nonhealing lower extremity ulcers.

Authors:  Orlando Portal; William A Clark; Dennis J Levinson
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.546

7.  Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  John Doupis; Aristidis Veves
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.546

Review 8.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes.

Authors:  R J Hinchliffe; G D Valk; J Apelqvist; D G Armstrong; K Bakker; F L Game; A Hartemann-Heurtier; M Löndahl; P E Price; W H van Houtum; W J Jeffcoate
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.876

Review 9.  Amputation in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Hendrik Van Damme; Raymond Limet
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.231

10.  Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study.

Authors:  L Prompers; N Schaper; J Apelqvist; M Edmonds; E Jude; D Mauricio; L Uccioli; V Urbancic; K Bakker; P Holstein; A Jirkovska; A Piaggesi; G Ragnarson-Tennvall; H Reike; M Spraul; K Van Acker; J Van Baal; F Van Merode; I Ferreira; M Huijberts
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 10.122

View more
  7 in total

1.  Early morphological changes in tissues when replacing abdominal wall defects by bacterial nanocellulose in experimental trials.

Authors:  Andrey N Zharikov; Vladimir G Lubyansky; Evgenia K Gladysheva; Ekaterina A Skiba; Vera V Budaeva; Elena N Semyonova; Andrey A Zharikov; Gennady V Sakovich
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Jo C Dumville; Susan O'Meara; Sohan Deshpande; Katharine Speak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-25

3.  Bacterial Cellulose-Adaptation of a Nature-Identical Material to the Needs of Advanced Chronic Wound Care.

Authors:  Paul Zahel; Uwe Beekmann; Thomas Eberlein; Michael Schmitz; Oliver Werz; Dana Kralisch
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 4.  Cellulose-Based Nanomaterials Advance Biomedicine: A Review.

Authors:  Hani Nasser Abdelhamid; Aji P Mathew
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Hydrocolloid dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Jo C Dumville; Sohan Deshpande; Susan O'Meara; Katharine Speak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-06

Review 6.  Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Jo C Dumville; Susan O'Meara; Sohan Deshpande; Katharine Speak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-12

Review 7.  Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Jo C Dumville; Sohan Deshpande; Susan O'Meara; Katharine Speak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.