BACKGROUND: Melanoma represents only 4% of all skin cancers, but nearly 80% of skin cancer deaths. This manuscript applies several new measurement technologies with the purpose of elucidating molecular signatures of melanoma aggressiveness. PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether low-abundant serum proteins related to apoptotic pathways could be measured and correlated with defined melanoma subtypes. Hydrogel core shell nanoparticles, a new technology capable of selectively entrapping low molecular weight proteins and protecting them from enzymatic degradation, were used to capture candidate serum biomarkers. Biomarker levels were correlated with confocal microscopy, thereby representing a combination of new technologies for in vivo histologic documentation. RESULTS: Among a panel of analyzed serum proteins, Bak was differentially expressed between nevi and melanomas. Melanomas with higher Bak serum levels exhibited more pronounced junctional activity on confocal imaging, whereas lesions with 'sparse' dermal nests had weak Bak expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our study links serum proteome analysis with confocal microscopic clinical in vivo histologic classification of melanomas. Bak has not been previously measured in serum. Bak differential expression among melanoma subtypes confirms the importance of the apoptotic pathway as a contributor to melanoma aggressiveness.
BACKGROUND:Melanoma represents only 4% of all skin cancers, but nearly 80% of skin cancer deaths. This manuscript applies several new measurement technologies with the purpose of elucidating molecular signatures of melanoma aggressiveness. PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether low-abundant serum proteins related to apoptotic pathways could be measured and correlated with defined melanoma subtypes. Hydrogel core shell nanoparticles, a new technology capable of selectively entrapping low molecular weight proteins and protecting them from enzymatic degradation, were used to capture candidate serum biomarkers. Biomarker levels were correlated with confocal microscopy, thereby representing a combination of new technologies for in vivo histologic documentation. RESULTS: Among a panel of analyzed serum proteins, Bak was differentially expressed between nevi and melanomas. Melanomas with higher Bak serum levels exhibited more pronounced junctional activity on confocal imaging, whereas lesions with 'sparse' dermal nests had weak Bak expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our study links serum proteome analysis with confocal microscopic clinical in vivo histologic classification of melanomas. Bak has not been previously measured in serum. Bak differential expression among melanoma subtypes confirms the importance of the apoptotic pathway as a contributor to melanoma aggressiveness.
Authors: John A Curtin; Jane Fridlyand; Toshiro Kageshita; Hetal N Patel; Klaus J Busam; Heinz Kutzner; Kwang-Hyun Cho; Setsuya Aiba; Eva-Bettina Bröcker; Philip E LeBoit; Dan Pinkel; Boris C Bastian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dorothea Becker; Martin C Mihm; Stephen M Hewitt; Vernon K Sondak; Jane W Fountain; Magdalena Thurin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: A Mandic; K Viktorsson; M Molin; G Akusjärvi; H Eguchi; S I Hayashi; M Toi; J Hansson; S Linder; M C Shoshan Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Jürgen Eberle; Lothar F Fecker; Amir M Hossini; Thomas Wieder; Peter T Daniel; Constantin E Orfanos; Christoph C Geilen Journal: Oncogene Date: 2003-12-11 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: K M Joyce; N M McInerney; C W Joyce; D M Jones; A J Hussey; P Donnellan; M J Kerin; J L Kelly; P J Regan Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Michael A Daniele; Yuriy P Bandera; Deepti Sharma; Parul Rungta; Ryan Roeder; Michael G Sehorn; Stephen H Foulger Journal: Small Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Bryan Krastins; Amol Prakash; David A Sarracino; Dobrin Nedelkov; Eric E Niederkofler; Urban A Kiernan; Randall Nelson; Maryann S Vogelsang; Gouri Vadali; Alejandra Garces; Jennifer N Sutton; Scott Peterman; Gregory Byram; Bruno Darbouret; Joëlle R Pérusse; Nabil G Seidah; Benoit Coulombe; Johan Gobom; Erik Portelius; Josef Pannee; Kaj Blennow; Vathany Kulasingam; Lewis Couchman; Caje Moniz; Mary F Lopez Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Jia Fan; Yi Huang; Inez Finoulst; Hung-Jen Wu; Zaian Deng; Rong Xu; Xiaojun Xia; Mauro Ferrari; Haifa Shen; Ye Hu Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Vincenzo Verdoliva; Cinzia Senatore; Maria Letizia Polci; Stefania Rossi; Martina Cordella; Giuseppe Carlucci; Paolo Marchetti; Giancarlo Antonini-Cappellini; Antonio Facchiano; Daniela D'Arcangelo; Francesco Facchiano Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 3.240