Literature DB >> 21158885

Randomised controlled trial of intermittent photic stimulation for treating amblyopia in older children and adults.

Bruce J W Evans1, Charlotte S Yu, Emmanuelle Massa, Jewlsy E Mathews.   

Abstract

The treatment of amblyopia is reviewed and it is noted that in addition to conventional 'passive treatment' in children with occlusion, it has been argued that 'active treatment' may be effective in older children and adults. Intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) is one such active treatment. In Study 1, we report a clinical audit of 21 patients treated with IPS, which demonstrated that the maximum improvement is reached after 6 half hour sessions. Study 2 is a double-masked randomised controlled trial comparing IPS with a control treatment in 30 participants aged 10-57 years. Using a sensitive staircase measure of visual acuity (VA), the IPS group improved by about one line (p = 0.0053). The mean improvement was significantly greater (unpaired t-test, p = 0.022) in the IPS group (mean 0.096; S.E.M. 0.029) than in the control group (mean 0.019; S.E.M. 0.022). The improvement occurred in participants with strabismic amblyopia, but not in those with anisometropic amblyopia. Follow up data after about 1 year showed that VA had regressed to pre-treatment levels. The results are discussed within the context of another development in active amblyopia therapy, perceptual learning. The literature on this therapy reveals improvements in VA of about 2.5 lines in older children and adults with anisometropic amblyopia. It is concluded that perceptual learning is likely a better treatment option than IPS for anisometropic amblyopes, and probably also for strabismic amblyopes although a randomised controlled trial is required. It is noted that the existence of effective treatments for adults does not detract from the need to treat amblyopia in younger children.
© 2010 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21158885     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00801.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  4 in total

Review 1.  Can perceptual learning be used to treat amblyopia beyond the critical period of visual development?

Authors:  Andrew T Astle; Ben S Webb; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.

Authors:  Vijay Tailor; Siobhan Ludden; Manuela Bossi; Catey Bunce; John A Greenwood; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-07

Review 3.  Development of a core outcome set for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders: a review to identify outcome measures.

Authors:  Samia Al Jabri; Jamie Kirkham; Fiona J Rowe
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 4.  Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.

Authors:  Vijay Tailor; Manuela Bossi; Catey Bunce; John A Greenwood; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.