OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in frontline caregiver daily practice in two types of skilled nursing facility (SNF) settings, Green House (GH) homes and traditional SNF units, related to overall staffing (nursing and nonnursing departments), direct care and indirect care time per resident day, and staff time interacting with residents. DESIGN: Observational, interview, and survey study comparing frontline caregiver daily practice in GH homes and traditional SNFs. SETTING: Twenty-seven sites (GH homes and traditional SNF units). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty staff from participating sites. MEASUREMENTS: Site and resident characteristics, nursing and nonnursing department staff hours per resident day (HPRDs), certified nursing assistant (CNA) direct and indirect care HPRDs, and CNA HPRDs engaged with residents. RESULTS: Staffing from nursing and nonnursing departments combined, excluding administrative, was 0.3 less HPRDs (18 minutes) in GH homes than in traditional SNFs. CNAs in GH homes, although responsible for more nonnursing activities such as laundry and housekeeping, spent 0.4 more HPRDs (24 minutes) in direct care activities than CNAs in traditional SNFs. CONCLUSION: The results challenge the assumption that staffing efficiencies cannot be achieved in small environments such as a GH home. Although the GH model has higher ratio of CNA staff to residents than traditional SNF units, overall staff time (combined total of nursing and nonnursing HPRDs) is slightly less in GH homes. The GH model allows for expanded responsibilities of CNAs in indirect care activities and more time in direct care activities and engaging directly with resident.
OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in frontline caregiver daily practice in two types of skilled nursing facility (SNF) settings, Green House (GH) homes and traditional SNF units, related to overall staffing (nursing and nonnursing departments), direct care and indirect care time per resident day, and staff time interacting with residents. DESIGN: Observational, interview, and survey study comparing frontline caregiver daily practice in GH homes and traditional SNFs. SETTING: Twenty-seven sites (GH homes and traditional SNF units). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty staff from participating sites. MEASUREMENTS: Site and resident characteristics, nursing and nonnursing department staff hours per resident day (HPRDs), certified nursing assistant (CNA) direct and indirect care HPRDs, and CNA HPRDs engaged with residents. RESULTS: Staffing from nursing and nonnursing departments combined, excluding administrative, was 0.3 less HPRDs (18 minutes) in GH homes than in traditional SNFs. CNAs in GH homes, although responsible for more nonnursing activities such as laundry and housekeeping, spent 0.4 more HPRDs (24 minutes) in direct care activities than CNAs in traditional SNFs. CONCLUSION: The results challenge the assumption that staffing efficiencies cannot be achieved in small environments such as a GH home. Although the GH model has higher ratio of CNA staff to residents than traditional SNF units, overall staff time (combined total of nursing and nonnursing HPRDs) is slightly less in GH homes. The GH model allows for expanded responsibilities of CNAs in indirect care activities and more time in direct care activities and engaging directly with resident.
Authors: Lauren W Cohen; Sheryl Zimmerman; David Reed; Patrick Brown; Barbara J Bowers; Kimberly Nolet; Sandra Hudak; Susan Horn Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Patrick B Brown; Sandra L Hudak; Susan D Horn; Lauren W Cohen; David Allen Reed; Sheryl Zimmerman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Barbara J Bowers; Lauren W Cohen; David C Grabowski; Susan D Horn; Peter Kemper Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Christopher C Afendulis; Daryl J Caudry; A James O'Malley; Peter Kemper; David C Grabowski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ju Young Yoon; Roger L Brown; Barbara J Bowers; Siobhan S Sharkey; Susan D Horn Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Carol Dumond-Stryker; Meera Tandan; John S Preisser; Christopher J Wretman; Abigail Howell; Susan Ryan Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 4.669