Literature DB >> 21158658

Safety and effectiveness of a 2009 H1N1 vaccine in Beijing.

Jiang Wu1, Fujie Xu, Li Lu, Min Lu, Liang Miao, Ting Gao, Wenyan Ji, Luodan Suo, Donglei Liu, Rui Ma, Rui Yu, Jiazi Zhangzhu, Weixiang Liu, Yang Zeng, Xiaomei Li, Xuechun Zhang, Xinghuo Pang, Ying Deng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After the first monovalent 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine became available in September 2009, Chinese officials conducted a mass vaccination program in Beijing. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.
METHODS: During a 5-day period in September 2009, a total of 95,244 children and adults received the PANFLU.1 vaccine (Sinovac Biotech), a monovalent split-virion vaccine of 15 μg of hemagglutinin antigen without adjuvant. We assessed adverse events after immunization through an enhanced passive-surveillance system and through active surveillance, using diary cards and telephone interviews. Active surveillance for neurologic diseases was implemented in hospitals citywide. To assess vaccine effectiveness, we compared the rates of reported laboratory-confirmed cases of 2009 H1N1 virus infection in students who received the vaccine with the rates in those who did not receive the vaccine, starting 2 weeks after the mass vaccination.
RESULTS: As of December 31, 2009, adverse events were reported by 193 vaccine recipients. Through hospital-based active surveillance, 362 cases of incident neurologic diseases were identified within 10 weeks after the mass vaccination, including 27 cases of the Guillain-Barré syndrome. None of the neurologic conditions occurred among vaccine recipients. From 245 schools, 25,037 students participated in the mass vaccination and 244,091 did not. During the period from October 9 through November 15, 2009, the incidence of confirmed cases of 2009 H1N1 virus infection per 100,000 students was 35.9 (9 of 25,037) among vaccinated students and 281.4 (687 of 244,091) among unvaccinated students. Thus, the estimated vaccine effectiveness was 87.3% (95% confidence interval, 75.4 to 93.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Among 95,244 children and adults in Beijing, the PANFLU.1 vaccine had a safety profile similar to those of seasonal influenza vaccines and appeared to be effective against confirmed H1N1 virus infection in school-age children. (Funded by the Beijing Municipal Health Bureau.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21158658     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  45 in total

Review 1.  Influenza-related pneumonia.

Authors:  Mark H Almond; Danny F McAuley; Matt P Wise; Mark J D Griffiths
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Collaborative studies on the development of national reference standards for potency determination of H7N9 influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Changgui Li; Kangwei Xu; Anwar Hashem; Ming Shao; Shuzhen Liu; Yong Zou; Qiang Gao; Yongchao Zhang; Liyong Yuan; Miao Xu; Xuguang Li; Junzhi Wang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Safety and immune responses in children after concurrent or sequential 2009 H1N1 and 2009-2010 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccinations.

Authors:  Sharon E Frey; David I Bernstein; Michael A Gerber; Harry L Keyserling; Flor M Munoz; Patricia L Winokur; Christine B Turley; Richard E Rupp; Heather Hill; Mark Wolff; Diana L Noah; Allison C Ross; Gretchen Cress; Robert B Belshe
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Effectiveness of an Indian-made attenuated influenza A(H1N1)pdm 2009 vaccine: a case control study.

Authors:  Prasad S Kulkarni; Sharad Agarkhedkar; Sanjay Lalwani; Ashish R Bavdekar; Sameer Jog; Sidram K Raut; Varsha Parulekar; Shalaka S Agarkhedkar; Sonali Palkar; Somnath Mangrule
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Seroprevalence of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza and effectiveness of 2010/2011 influenza vaccine during 2010/2011 season in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Peng Yang; Li Zhang; Weixian Shi; Guilan Lu; Shujuan Cui; Xiaomin Peng; Daitao Zhang; Yimeng Liu; Huijie Liang; Xinghuo Pang; Quanyi Wang
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 6.  Influenza virus vaccines: lessons from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Authors:  Andrew J Broadbent; Kanta Subbarao
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 7.  Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Alessandro Rivetti; Carlo Di Pietrantonj; Vittorio Demicheli; Eliana Ferroni
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

8.  Phase II trial in adults of concurrent or sequential 2009 pandemic H1N1 and 2009-2010 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccinations.

Authors:  Sharon E Frey; David I Bernstein; Rebecca C Brady; Wendy A Keitel; Hana El Sahly; Nadine Georges Rouphael; Mark J Mulligan; Robert L Atmar; Srilatha Edupuganti; Shital M Patel; Michelle Dickey; Irene Graham; Edwin L Anderson; Diana L Noah; Heather Hill; Mark Wolff; Robert B Belshe
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Higher Immunological Protection of Pandemic 2009 H1N1 Influenza Live Virus Infection than Split Vaccine Against the Homologous Virus for Long Term Immunization in Ferret.

Authors:  Lingjun Zhan; Wei Deng; Linlin Bao; Qi Lv; Chunmei Ma; Fengdi Li; Lili Xu; Chuan Qin
Journal:  Indian J Virol       Date:  2012-09-28

10.  Generation of human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus from peripheral blood memory B lymphocytes.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Chi Ma; Yanlai Lu; Xu Ji; Yongsheng Pang; Fang Hua; Lianxian Cui; Denian Ba; Wei He
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 11.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.