Literature DB >> 21157978

Gastroesophageal flap valve status distinguishes clinical phenotypes of large hiatal hernia.

Haruka Kaneyama1, Mitsuru Kaise, Hiroshi Arakawa, Yoshinori Arai, Keisuke Kanazawa, Hisao Tajiri.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate two distinct clinical phenotypes of reflux esophagitis and intra-hernial ulcer (Cameron lesions) in patients with large hiatal hernias.
METHODS: A case series study was performed with 16 831 patients who underwent diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy for 2 years at an academic referral center. A hiatus diameter ≥ 4 cm was defined as a large hernia. A sharp fold that surrounded the cardia was designated as an intact gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV), and a loose fold or disappearance of the fold was classified as an impaired GEFV. We studied the associations between large hiatal hernias and the distinct clinical phenotypes (reflux esophagitis and Cameron lesions), and analyzed factors that distinguished the clinical phenotypes.
RESULTS: Large hiatal hernias were found in 49 (0.3%) of 16,831 patients. Cameron lesions and reflux esophagitis were observed in 10% and 47% of these patients, and 0% and 8% of the patients without large hiatal hernias, which indicated significant associations between large hiatal hernias and these diseases. However, there was no coincidence of the two distinct disorders. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant associations between Cameron lesions and the clinico-endoscopic factors such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) intake (80% in Cameron lesion cases vs 18% in non-Cameron lesion cases, P = 0.015) and intact GEFV (100% in Cameron lesion cases vs 18% in non-Cameron lesion cases, P = 0.0007). In contrast, reflux esophagitis was linked with impaired GEFV (44% in reflux esophagitis cases vs 8% in non-reflux esophagitis cases, P = 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed these significant associations.
CONCLUSION: GEFV status and NSAID intake distinguish clinical phenotypes of large hiatal hernias. Cameron lesions are associated with intact GEFV and NSAID intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21157978      PMCID: PMC3007116          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i47.6010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  13 in total

1.  Inter- and intra-observer variability in the measurement of length at endoscopy: Implications for the measurement of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Nalini M Guda; Susan Partington; Nimish Vakil
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal flap valve as diagnostic indicators in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Kyoichi Adachi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Hiatal hernia: myth or reality?

Authors:  R K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-11-24       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Hiatal hernia size is the dominant determinant of esophagitis presence and severity in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M P Jones; S S Sloan; J C Rabine; C C Ebert; C F Huang; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Reappraisal of the flap valve mechanism in the gastroesophageal junction. A study of a new valvuloplasty procedure in cadavers.

Authors:  K B Thor; L D Hill; D D Mercer; R D Kozarek
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1987-01

Review 6.  Hiatal hernia with cameron ulcers and erosions.

Authors:  A P Weston
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1996-10

7.  The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations.

Authors:  L D Hill; R A Kozarek; S J Kraemer; R W Aye; C D Mercer; D E Low; C E Pope
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  C Gordon; J Y Kang; P J Neild; J D Maxwell
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Hiatal hernia size affects lower esophageal sphincter function, esophageal acid exposure, and the degree of mucosal injury.

Authors:  M G Patti; H I Goldberg; M Arcerito; L Bortolasi; J Tong; L W Way
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Linear gastric erosion. A lesion associated with large diaphragmatic hernia and chronic blood loss anemia.

Authors:  A J Cameron; J A Higgins
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  1 in total

1.  HiatoGast 1: an exploring, semiblinded trial establishing a new endoscopical categorisation of axial hiatal hernias.

Authors:  Daniel Eckhardt; Matthias A Engel; Henriette Golcher; Christian Krautz; Robert Grützmann; Moustafa Elshafei
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.