Literature DB >> 21157387

Effect of different types of conditioning contraction on upper body postactivation potentiation.

Joseph I Esformes1, Matthew Keenan, Jeremy Moody, Theodoros M Bampouras.   

Abstract

Muscle contractions preceding an activity can result in increased force generation (postactivation potentiation [PAP]). Although the type of muscular contractions could affect subsequent strength and power performance, little information exists on their effects. The purpose of this study was to examine PAP effects produced by isometric (ISO), concentric (CON), eccentric (ECC), or concentric-eccentric (DYN) conditioning contractions on upper body force and power performance. Ten male, competitive rugby players (mean ± SD: age 20.4 ± 0.8 years, height 177.0 ± 8.1 cm, body mass 90.2 ± 13.8 kg) performed a ballistic bench press throw (BBPT) followed by a 10-minute rest and one of the conditioning contractions. After a 12-minute rest, the subjects performed another BBPT (post-BBPT). The conditioning contractions, applied on separate days and in counterbalanced randomized order, were a 7-second isometric barbell bench press for ISO and 1 set of 3 bench press repetitions at 3 repetition maximum for CON, ECC, and DYN (each repetition lasting 2 seconds for CON and ECC, overall execution time <7 seconds for DYN). Peak power (Ppeak), peak force (Fpeak), maximum distance (Dmax) and rate of force development (RFD) were measured using a linear position transducer. Electromyography (EMG) of the pectoralis major and triceps brachii was also recorded. The ISO produced significantly higher Ppeak (587 ± 116 and 605 ± 126 W for pre- and post-BBPT, respectively; p < 0.05). No significant differences in Ppeak were revealed for CON, ECC, and DYN (p > 0.05), and no significant differences existed in Fpeak, Dmax, and RFD for ISO, CON, ECC, and DYN (p > 0.05). Finally, EMG was not significantly different between pre- and post-BBPT for any of the conditioning contractions (p > 0.05). Isometric contractions appear to be the only conditioning contractions increasing upper body power output after long resting periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21157387     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181fef7f3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  9 in total

Review 1.  Factors Modulating Post-Activation Potentiation of Jump, Sprint, Throw, and Upper-Body Ballistic Performances: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Laurent B Seitz; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  What are the best isometric exercises of muscle potentiation?

Authors:  Albertas Skurvydas; Giedre Jurgelaitiene; Sigitas Kamandulis; Dalia Mickeviciene; Marius Brazaitis; Dovile Valanciene; Diana Karanauskiene; Mantas Mickevicius; Gediminas Mamkus
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Postactivation potentiation biases maximal isometric strength assessment.

Authors:  Leonardo Coelho Rabello Lima; Felipe Bruno Dias Oliveira; Thiago Pires Oliveira; Claudio de Oliveira Assumpção; Camila Coelho Greco; Adalgiso Croscato Cardozo; Benedito Sérgio Denadai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Post-Activation Potentiation: Is there an Optimal Training Volume and Intensity to Induce Improvements in Vertical Jump Ability in Highly-Trained Subjects?

Authors:  Ronaldo Kobal; Lucas A Pereira; Katia Kitamura; Anderson C Paulo; Henrique A Ramos; Everton C Carmo; Hamilton Roschel; Valmor Tricoli; Chris Bishop; Irineu Loturco
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Can Post-Activation Performance Enhancement (PAPE) Improve Resistance Training Volume during the Bench Press Exercise?

Authors:  Michal Krzysztofik; Michal Wilk; Aleksandra Filip; Piotr Zmijewski; Adam Zajac; James J Tufano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance.

Authors:  Salvador Vargas-Molina; Ulises Salgado-Ramírez; Iván Chulvi-Medrano; Leandro Carbone; Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo; Javier Benítez-Porres
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Upper-Body Post-activation Performance Enhancement for Athletic Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Recommendations for Future Research.

Authors:  Mitchell James Finlay; Craig Alan Bridge; Matt Greig; Richard Michael Page
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 11.928

8.  Post-Isometric Back Squat Performance Enhancement of Squat and Countermovement Jump.

Authors:  Michał Spieszny; Robert Trybulski; Piotr Biel; Adam Zając; Michał Krzysztofik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Post-Activation Potentiation: Is there an Optimal Training Volume and Intensity to Induce Improvements in Vertical Jump Ability in Highly-Trained Subjects?

Authors:  Ronaldo Kobal; Lucas A Pereira; Katia Kitamura; Anderson C Paulo; Henrique A Ramos; Everton C Carmo; Hamilton Roschel; Valmor Tricoli; Chris Bishop; Irineu Loturco
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.193

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.