Literature DB >> 2115699

Acceptance and perceptions of NORPLANT among users in San Francisco, USA.

P D Darney1, E Atkinson, S Tanner, S MacPherson, S Hellerstein, A Alvarado.   

Abstract

Two hundred and five women participating in a five-year clinical trial of NORPLANT and NORPLANT-2 were interviewed about their contraceptive and reproductive history, sources of information and knowledge of NORPLANT, experiences using the method, and the impressions of friends and family about the method. The most common reasons for trying the implants were dissatisfaction with other methods and perceptions about NORPLANT's ease of use. Forty-one percent of acceptors had anxiety prior to insertion; 49 percent of these feared pain, but only 5 percent said that they actually experienced significant pain. Women also feared implant removal, but their fear did not influence their decision to continue or discontinue use, and 74 percent reported little or no pain at removal. Most of the women were pleased with NORPLANT, although 95 percent reported side effects, with 82 percent reporting changes in menstruation. More than one-half of those women who discontinued reported that they would use the implants again. Seventy-four percent of the current users interviewed said they would like to use the implants in the future. For the women enrolled in the clinical trial, NORPLANT appeared to be a highly acceptable method of contraception, despite the frequent occurrence of bothersome side effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptor Characteristics; Acceptors; Americas; Behavior; California; Clinical Research; Contraception; Contraception Continuation; Contraception Termination--indications; Contraceptive Implants--side effects; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Usage; Data Collection; Decision Making; Developed Countries; Evaluation; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Knowledge; Menstrual Cycle--changes; Menstruation; Method Acceptability; North America; Northern America; Perception; Psychological Factors; Psychosocial Factors; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Satisfaction; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2115699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  5 in total

1.  Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women.

Authors:  S Guendelman; C Denny; J Mauldon; C Chetkovich
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-12

2.  Topics for our times: Norplant coercion--an overstated threat.

Authors:  A R Davidson; D Kalmuss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Depot levonorgestrel (Norplant) use in teenagers.

Authors:  M Miller
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-02

Review 4.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Contraception on trial.

Authors:  M L Frank; C DiMaria
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Norplant selection and satisfaction among low-income women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; K Schmitt; C A Bono; J Steele; M K Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.