Literature DB >> 21156020

A phase II study of the efficacy and safety of AMG 102 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Patrick Schöffski1, Jorge A Garcia, Walter M Stadler, Thierry Gil, Eric Jonasch, Scott T Tagawa, Melanie Smitt, Xinqun Yang, Kelly S Oliner, Abraham Anderson, Min Zhu, Fairooz Kabbinavar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent AMG 102, an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • This open-label phase II study included patients ≥ 18 years old with histologically confirmed, advanced or metastatic RCC (mRCC) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. AMG 102 was administered i.v. at 10 or 20 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. • A two-stage design was used at each dose level and the primary endpoint was objective best confirmed response (by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) at any time.
RESULTS: • Sixty-one patients with mRCC enrolled and received AMG 102 (40 at 10 mg/kg; 21 at 20 mg/kg). Overall, 70.5% were men, median age was 59 years (range, 39 to 84 years), and 92% had received previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. RCC histologies were: clear cell (75.4%), papillary (11.5%), chromophobe (4.9%) and unclassified (8.2%). • One confirmed partial response occurred at 10 mg/kg, maintained for over 2.5 years; 26 patients (43%) had stable disease, 10 (16%) for ≥ 32 weeks. The median profression-free survival was 3.7 months at 10 mg/kg and 2.0 months at 20 mg/kg. The commonest adverse events were oedema (45.9%), fatigue (37.7%) and nausea (27.9%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 33% of patients, the most common being oedema (9.8%). • Baseline levels of plasma HGF/SF and soluble c-Met as well as archival-tumour c-Met did not correlate with measures of efficacy.
CONCLUSION: • Single-agent AMG 102 was tolerable, but it is unclear if AMG 102 was growth inhibitory in this population of patients with mRCC.
© 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL. NO CLAIM TO ORIGINAL US GOVERNMENT WORKS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21156020     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09947.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  23 in total

1.  Promise and challenges on the horizon of MET-targeted cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Yu-Wen Zhang
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-05-26

2.  Incomplete target neutralization by the anti-cancer antibody rilotumumab.

Authors:  Sameer A Greenall; Timothy E Adams; Terrance G Johns
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  Targeted therapeutic strategies for the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Eric A Singer; Gopal N Gupta; Ramaprasad Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  c-Met is a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  G T Gibney; S A Aziz; R L Camp; P Conrad; B E Schwartz; C R Chen; W K Kelly; H M Kluger
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Inhibitors of HGFA, Matriptase, and Hepsin Serine Proteases: A Nonkinase Strategy to Block Cell Signaling in Cancer.

Authors:  Zhenfu Han; Peter K W Harris; Darin E Jones; Ryan Chugani; Tommy Kim; Manjula Agarwal; Wei Shen; Scott A Wildman; James W Janetka
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Phase I Study of AMG 337, a Highly Selective Small-molecule MET Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  David S Hong; Patricia LoRusso; Omid Hamid; Filip Janku; Muaiad Kittaneh; Daniel V T Catenacci; Emily Chan; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Shirish M Gadgeel; Robert D Loberg; Benny M Amore; Yuying C Hwang; Rui Tang; Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith; Eunice L Kwak
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Targeting c-MET in gastrointestinal tumours: rationale, opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Conor A Bradley; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Alberto Bardelli; Christian Rolfo; Josep Tabernero; Hajrah A Khawaja; Mark Lawler; Patrick G Johnston; Sandra Van Schaeybroeck
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rilotumumab: a decade of experience in preclinical and clinical cancer research.

Authors:  Y Zhang; S Doshi; M Zhu
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  A new age for vaccine therapy in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sumanta K Pal; Adriana Hu; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

10.  Targeting the hepatocyte growth factor-cMET axis in cancer therapy.

Authors:  George R Blumenschein; Gordon B Mills; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.