Literature DB >> 21155861

A risk assessment framework for assessing metallic nanomaterials of environmental concern: aquatic exposure and behavior.

Niall Joseph O'Brien1, Enda J Cummins.   

Abstract

Nanomaterials are finding application in many different environmentally relevant products and processes due to enhanced catalytic, antimicrobial, and oxidative properties of materials at this scale. As the market share of nano-functionalized products increases, so too does the potential for environmental exposure and contamination. This study presents some exposure ranking methods that consider potential metallic nanomaterial surface water exposure and fate, due to nano-functionalized products, through a number of exposure pathways. These methods take into account the limited and disparate data currently available for metallic nanomaterials and apply variability and uncertainty principles, together with qualitative risk assessment principles, to develop a scientific ranking. Three exposure scenarios with three different nanomaterials were considered to demonstrate these assessment methods: photo-catalytic exterior paint (nano-scale TiO₂), antimicrobial food packaging (nano-scale Ag), and particulate-reducing diesel fuel additives (nano-scale CeO₂). Data and hypotheses from literature relating to metallic nanomaterial aquatic behavior (including the behavior of materials that may relate to nanomaterials in aquatic environments, e.g., metals, pesticides, surfactants) were used together with commercial nanomaterial characteristics and Irish natural aquatic environment characteristics to rank the potential concentrations, transport, and persistence behaviors within subjective categories. These methods, and the applied scenarios, reveal where data critical to estimating exposure and risk are lacking. As research into the behavior of metallic nanomaterials in different environments emerges, the influence of material and environmental characteristics on nanomaterial behavior within these exposure- and risk-ranking methods may be redefined on a quantitative basis.
© 2010 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21155861     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01540.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  3 in total

1.  Nanoparticle pollution and associated increasing potential risks on environment and human health: a case study of China.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Tiantian Yang; Jin Jin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Altered growth and enzyme expression profile of ZnO nanoparticles exposed non-target environmentally beneficial bacteria.

Authors:  Maria Celisa Santimano; Meenal Kowshik
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Needs and challenges for assessing the environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).

Authors:  Michelle Romero-Franco; Hilary A Godwin; Muhammad Bilal; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.649

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.