Literature DB >> 21154363

Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.

Kate Cahill1, Lindsay F Stead, Tim Lancaster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nicotine receptor partial agonists may help people to stop smoking by a combination of maintaining moderate levels of dopamine to counteract withdrawal symptoms (acting as an agonist) and reducing smoking satisfaction (acting as an antagonist). Varenicline was developed as a nicotine receptor partial agonist from cytisine, a drug widely used in central and eastern Europe for smoking cessation. The first trial reports of varenicline were released in 2006, and further trials have now been published or are currently underway.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this review is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of nicotine receptor partial agonists, including varenicline and cytisine, for smoking cessation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's specialised register for trials, using the terms ('varenicline' or 'cytisine' or 'Tabex' or 'nicotine receptor partial agonist') and 'smoking' in the title or abstract, or as keywords. We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL using MeSH terms and free text, and we contacted authors of trial reports for additional information where necessary. The latest search was in September 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials which compared the treatment drug with placebo. We also included comparisons with bupropion and nicotine patches where available. We excluded trials which did not report a minimum follow-up period of six months from start of treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data on the type of participants, the dose and duration of treatment, the outcome measures, the randomization procedure, concealment of allocation, and completeness of follow up.The main outcome measured was abstinence from smoking after at least six months from the beginning of treatment. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence, and preferred biochemically validated rates where they were reported. Where appropriate we performed meta-analysis to produce a risk ratio, using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. MAIN
RESULTS: We found 11 trials of varenicline compared with placebo for smoking cessation; three of these included a bupropion experimental arm. We also found one relapse prevention trial, comparing varenicline with placebo, and two open-label trials comparing varenicline with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). We also include one trial in which all the participants were given varenicline, but received behavioural support either online or by phone calls, or by both methods. This trial is not included in the analyses, but contributes to the data on safety and tolerability. The included studies covered >10,300 participants, 6892 of whom used varenicline. We identified one trial of cytisine (Tabex) for inclusion.The pooled risk ratio (RR) (10 trials, 4443 people, excluding one trial evaluating long term safety) for continuous abstinence at six months or longer for varenicline at standard dosage versus placebo was 2.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01 to 2.66). Varenicline at lower or variable doses was also shown to be effective, with an RR of 2.09 (95% CI 1.56 to 2.78; 4 trials, 1272 people). The pooled RR for varenicline versus bupropion at one year was 1.52 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.88; 3 trials, 1622 people). The RR for varenicline versus NRT for point prevalence abstinence at 24 weeks was 1.13 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.35; 2 trials, 778 people). The two trials which tested the use of varenicline beyond the 12-week standard regimen found the drug to be well-tolerated during long-term use. The main adverse effect of varenicline was nausea, which was mostly at mild to moderate levels and usually subsided over time. Post-marketing safety data raised questions about a possible association between varenicline and depressed mood, agitation, and suicidal behaviour or ideation. The labelling of varenicline was amended in 2008, and the manufacturers produced a Medication Guide. Thus far, surveillance reports and secondary analyses of trial data lend little support to a causal relationship.The one cytisine trial included in this review found that more participants taking cytisine stopped smoking compared with placebo at two-year follow up, with an RR of 1.61 (95% CI 1.24 to 2.08). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline at standard dose increased the chances of successful long-term smoking cessation between two- and threefold compared with pharmacologically unassisted quit attempts. Lower dose regimens also conferred benefits for cessation, while reducing the incidence of adverse events. More participants quit successfully with varenicline than with bupropion. Two open-label trials of varenicline versus NRT suggested a modest benefit of varenicline but confidence intervals did not rule out equivalence. Limited evidence suggests that varenicline may have a role to play in relapse prevention. The main adverse effect of varenicline is nausea, but mostly at mild to moderate levels and tending to subside over time. Possible links with serious adverse events, including depressed mood, agitation and suicidal thoughts, have been reported but are so far not substantiated.There is a need for further independent community-based trials of varenicline, to test its efficacy and safety in smokers with varying co-morbidities and risk patterns. There is a need for further trials of the efficacy of treatment extended beyond 12 weeks. Cytisine may also increase the chances of quitting, but the evidence at present is inconclusive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21154363     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  14 in total

1.  Relative potency of varenicline or fluvoxamine to reduce responding for ethanol versus food depends on the presence or absence of concurrently earned food.

Authors:  Brett C Ginsburg; Richard J Lamb
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Tobacco addiction and the dysregulation of brain stress systems.

Authors:  Adrie W Bruijnzeel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Australian smokers increasingly use help to quit, but number of attempts remains stable: findings from the International Tobacco Control Study 2002-09.

Authors:  Jae Cooper; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 4.  Neuroscience of behavioral and pharmacological treatments for addictions.

Authors:  Marc N Potenza; Mehmet Sofuoglu; Kathleen M Carroll; Bruce J Rounsaville
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Exploring the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and varenicline.

Authors:  Brady M Thompson; Scott T Barrett; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 6.  Common and distinct neural targets of treatment: changing brain function in substance addiction.

Authors:  Anna B Konova; Scott J Moeller; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  [Psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for harmful tobacco use and tobacco dependency].

Authors:  A Batra; K U Petersen; E Hoch; K Mann; C Kröger; C Schweizer; A Jähne; T Rüther; N Thürauf; S Mühlig
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012) : the fifth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts).

Authors:  Joep Perk; Guy De Backer; Helmut Gohlke; Ian Graham; Zeljko Reiner; W M Monique Verschuren; Christian Albus; Pascale Benlian; Gudrun Boysen; Renata Cifkova; Christi Deaton; Shah Ebrahim; Miles Fisher; Giuseppe Germano; Richard Hobbs; Arno Hoes; Sehnaz Karadeniz; Alessandro Mezzani; Eva Prescott; Lars Ryden; Martin Scherer; Mikko Syvänne; Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer; Christiaan Vrints; David Wood; Jose Luis Zamorano; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2012-12

9.  How pragmatic or explanatory is the randomized, controlled trial? The application and enhancement of the PRECIS tool to the evaluation of a smoking cessation trial.

Authors:  Peter Selby; Gerald Brosky; Paul I Oh; Vincent Raymond; Suzanne Ranger
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Electronic cigarettes and thirdhand tobacco smoke: two emerging health care challenges for the primary care provider.

Authors:  Ware G Kuschner; Sunayana Reddy; Nidhi Mehrotra; Harman S Paintal
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2011-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.