Literature DB >> 21154145

Lessons learned from candidate drug attrition.

James R Empfield1, Paul D Leeson.   

Abstract

Rising expenditure in pharmaceutical R&D has not been matched by increased productivity. There is an urgent need to solve the current high levels of pipeline attrition. Changing the current failed model of drug discovery and development, in which high numbers of candidate drugs are produced and high attrition is accepted, is essential. A different model is needed, in which the focus shifts to identifying better-quality candidate drugs that allow scientifically robust testing of disease and targets in humans. Lowering the risks of compound-based attrition in small-molecule drug discovery and development (ie, addressing toxicity, specificity, potency, duration and exposure) is achievable by improved control of physical properties and by setting more demanding candidate criteria. Separating the key scientific experiment--proof-of-concept clinical trials in humans--from commercial development imperatives is a necessary step for the industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21154145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IDrugs        ISSN: 1369-7056


  10 in total

1.  Leveraging Big Data to Transform Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Benjamin S Glicksberg; Li Li; Rong Chen; Joel Dudley; Bin Chen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

Review 2.  Drug discovery effectiveness from the standpoint of therapeutic mechanisms and indications.

Authors:  Hsin-Pei Shih; Xiaodan Zhang; Alex M Aronov
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Molecular conformations, interactions, and properties associated with drug efficiency and clinical performance among VEGFR TK inhibitors.

Authors:  Michele McTigue; Brion William Murray; Jeffrey H Chen; Ya-Li Deng; James Solowiej; Robert S Kania
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Progress in structure based drug design for G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Christopher J Langmead; Jonathan S Mason; Fiona H Marshall
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  A new in vivo screening paradigm to accelerate antimalarial drug discovery.

Authors:  María Belén Jiménez-Díaz; Sara Viera; Javier Ibáñez; Teresa Mulet; Noemí Magán-Marchal; Helen Garuti; Vanessa Gómez; Lorena Cortés-Gil; Antonio Martínez; Santiago Ferrer; María Teresa Fraile; Félix Calderón; Esther Fernández; Leonard D Shultz; Didier Leroy; David M Wilson; José Francisco García-Bustos; Francisco Javier Gamo; Iñigo Angulo-Barturen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An analysis of a 'community-driven' reconstruction of the human metabolic network.

Authors:  Neil Swainston; Pedro Mendes; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.290

7.  A 'rule of 0.5' for the metabolite-likeness of approved pharmaceutical drugs.

Authors:  Steve O Hagan; Neil Swainston; Julia Handl; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.290

8.  In silico modeling of human α2C-adrenoreceptor interaction with filamin-2.

Authors:  Marcin Pawlowski; Saras Saraswathi; Hanaa K B Motawea; Maqsood A Chotani; Andrzej Kloczkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Enhancing Drug Efficacy and Therapeutic Index through Cheminformatics-Based Selection of Small Molecule Binary Weapons That Improve Transporter-Mediated Targeting: A Cytotoxicity System Based on Gemcitabine.

Authors:  Justine M Grixti; Steve O'Hagan; Philip J Day; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Drug repurposing: a systematic review on root causes, barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Nithya Krishnamurthy; Alyssa A Grimshaw; Sydney A Axson; Sung Hee Choe; Jennifer E Miller
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.908

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.