Literature DB >> 21153394

[Plasma E-cadherin levels in urinary bladder cancer: does it improve risk stratification?].

T Szarvas1, F Hoffmann, M Becker, M Schenck, F Vom Dorp, H Rübben, T Jäger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary bladder cancer represents a heterogeneous group of cancers regarding their clinical behaviour. For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer the 5-year disease-specific survival rate is only 50%. The main cause of death in this patient group is rapid metastatic progression following surgery. Clinicopathological features provide only limited information to predict disease progression in these patients. E-cadherin is a transmembrane glycoprotein critically involved in epithelial cell adhesion. Elevated circulating E-cadherin levels were shown to be correlated with progression of bladder cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Plasma E-cadherin levels of 97 patients and 17 controls were analysed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and results were compared with the clinical follow-up data.
RESULTS: Plasma E-cadherin concentrations were significantly higher in patients than in controls (p<0.001). E-cadherin levels were not significantly correlated with clinicopathological parameters such as tumour stage (p=0.196), grade (p=0.570) and lymph node status (p=0.581). In a subgroup of patients treated by radical cystectomy, E-cadherin concentrations were higher in lymph node-positive cases; however, this correlation (p=0.100) failed to reach statistical significance. Furthermore, plasma E-cadherin levels were not able to predict disease-specific survival or metastasis-free survival (p=0.512 and p=0.197).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that soluble E-cadherin levels are not able to predict patients' prognosis and underline the importance of external validation in prognostic marker research. Molecular markers predicting disease progression after radical cystectomy to identify high-risk patients and improve therapy decisions are still needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21153394     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-010-2454-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  25 in total

Review 1.  [Value of biomarkers in urology].

Authors:  P J Goebell; B Keck; S Wach; B Wullich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Matrix metalloproteinase-7 as a marker of metastasis and predictor of poor survival in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Tibor Szarvas; Markus Becker; Frank vom Dorp; Carolin Gethmann; Martin Tötsch; Agnes Bánkfalvi; Kurt W Schmid; Imre Romics; Herbert Rübben; Süleyman Ergün
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.716

3.  The prognostic value of cadherin switch in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Jäger; Markus Becker; Andreas Eisenhardt; Derya Tilki; Martin Tötsch; Kurt W Schmid; Imre Romics; Herbert Rübben; Süleyman Ergün; Tibor Szarvas
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  The prognostic value of E-cadherin, alpha-, beta-, and gamma-catenin in urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Keishi Kashibuchi; Kyoichi Tomita; Jack A Schalken; Haruki Kume; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Satoru Muto; Sigeo Horie; Tadaichi Kitamura
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer today--a homogeneous series without neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Stephan Madersbacher; Werner Hochreiter; Fiona Burkhard; George N Thalmann; Hansjörg Danuser; Regula Markwalder; Urs E Studer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Tissue microarray analysis of the prognostic value of E-cadherin, Ki67, p53, p27, survivin and MSH2 expression in upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gaëlle Fromont; Morgan Rouprêt; Najla Amira; Mathilde Sibony; Guy Vallancien; Pierre Validire; Olivier Cussenot
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Urinary matrix metalloproteinase-7 level is associated with the presence of metastasis in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Tibor Szarvas; Bernhard B Singer; Markus Becker; Frank Vom Dorp; Tobias Jäger; Attila Szendroi; Péter Riesz; Imre Romics; Herbert Rübben; Süleyman Ergün
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Expression of classic cadherins type I in urothelial neoplastic progression.

Authors:  K M Rieger-Christ; J W Cain; J W Braasch; J M Dugan; M L Silverman; B Bouyounes; J A Libertino; I C Summerhayes
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example.

Authors:  S E Bleeker; H A Moll; E W Steyerberg; A R T Donders; G Derksen-Lubsen; D E Grobbee; K G M Moons
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Loss of E-cadherin expression correlates with poor differentiation and invasion into adjacent organs in gastric adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Hui-Chun Chen; Ricky Y Chu; Ping-Ning Hsu; Ping I Hsu; Jau-Yeong Lu; Kwok-Hung Lai; Hui-Hwa Tseng; Nan-Hua Chou; Ming-Shyan Huang; Ching-Jiunn Tseng; Michael Hsiao
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 8.679

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Use of marker systems in the treatment of bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Burger; F Vom Dorp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.