PURPOSE: To define the rule according to which crystalloid solutions characterized by different strong ion difference (SID) modify the acid-base variables of human plasma. METHODS: With a previously validated software, we computed the effects of diluting human plasma with crystalloid solutions ([SID] 0-60, 10 mEq/l stepwise). An equation was derived to compute the diluent [SID] required to maintain the baseline pH unchanged, at constant PCO₂ and at every dilution fraction. The results were experimentally tested using fresh frozen plasma, re-warmed at 37°C, equilibrated at PCO₂ 35 and 78 mmHg, at baseline and after the infusion of crystalloid solutions with 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 mEq/l [SID]. RESULTS: The mathematical analysis showed that the diluent [SID] required to maintain unmodified the baseline pH equals the baseline bicarbonate concentration, [HCO₃⁻], assuming constant PCO₂ throughout the process. The experimental data confirmed the theoretical analysis. In fact, at the baseline [HCO₃⁻] of 18.3 ± 0.3 mmol/l (PCO₂ 35 mmHg) the pH was 7.332 ± 0.004 and remained 7.333 ± 0.003 when the diluting [SID] was 18.5 ± 0.0 mEq/l. At baseline [HCO₃⁻] of 19.5 ± 0.3 mmol/l (PCO₂ 78 mmHg) the pH was 7.010 ± 0.003 and remained 7.004 ± 0.003 when the diluting [SID] was 19.1 ± 0.1 mEq/l. At both PCO₂ values infusion with [SID] lower or greater than baseline [HCO₃⁻] led pH to decrease or increase, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The baseline [HCO₃⁻] dictates the pH response to crystalloid infusion. If a crystalloid [SID] equals baseline [HCO₃⁻], pH remains unchanged at constant PCO₂, whereas it increases or decreases if the [SID] is greater or lower, respectively.
PURPOSE: To define the rule according to which crystalloid solutions characterized by different strong ion difference (SID) modify the acid-base variables of human plasma. METHODS: With a previously validated software, we computed the effects of diluting human plasma with crystalloid solutions ([SID] 0-60, 10 mEq/l stepwise). An equation was derived to compute the diluent [SID] required to maintain the baseline pH unchanged, at constant PCO₂ and at every dilution fraction. The results were experimentally tested using fresh frozen plasma, re-warmed at 37°C, equilibrated at PCO₂ 35 and 78 mmHg, at baseline and after the infusion of crystalloid solutions with 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 mEq/l [SID]. RESULTS: The mathematical analysis showed that the diluent [SID] required to maintain unmodified the baseline pH equals the baseline bicarbonate concentration, [HCO₃⁻], assuming constant PCO₂ throughout the process. The experimental data confirmed the theoretical analysis. In fact, at the baseline [HCO₃⁻] of 18.3 ± 0.3 mmol/l (PCO₂ 35 mmHg) the pH was 7.332 ± 0.004 and remained 7.333 ± 0.003 when the diluting [SID] was 18.5 ± 0.0 mEq/l. At baseline [HCO₃⁻] of 19.5 ± 0.3 mmol/l (PCO₂ 78 mmHg) the pH was 7.010 ± 0.003 and remained 7.004 ± 0.003 when the diluting [SID] was 19.1 ± 0.1 mEq/l. At both PCO₂ values infusion with [SID] lower or greater than baseline [HCO₃⁻] led pH to decrease or increase, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The baseline [HCO₃⁻] dictates the pH response to crystalloid infusion. If a crystalloid [SID] equals baseline [HCO₃⁻], pH remains unchanged at constant PCO₂, whereas it increases or decreases if the [SID] is greater or lower, respectively.
Authors: T Langer; E Carlesso; A Protti; M Monti; B Comini; L Zani; D T Andreis; G E Iapichino; D Dondossola; P Caironi; S Gatti; L Gattinoni Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen; André Luiz Nunes Gobatto; Lívia Maria Garcia Melro; Alexandre Toledo Maciel; Marcelo Park Journal: World J Crit Care Med Date: 2015-05-04
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Daniel De Backer; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Manu L N G Malbrain; Thomas Langer; Djillali Annane; Luciano Gattinoni; Paul Elbers; Robert G Hahn; Inneke De Laet; Andrea Minini; Adrian Wong; Can Ince; David Muckart; Monty Mythen; Pietro Caironi; Niels Van Regenmortel Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: W Anthony Hawkins; Susan E Smith; Andrea Sikora Newsome; John R Carr; Christopher M Bland; Trisha N Branan Journal: J Pharm Pract Date: 2019-06-30