| Literature DB >> 21151661 |
Emelie Benyi1, Maria Berner, Inger Bjernekull, Anders Boman, Dionisios Chrysis, Ola Nilsson, Anne Waehre, Henrik Wehtje, Lars Sävendahl.
Abstract
Objective. The aim was to determine efficacy and safety of a surgical method to reduce adult height in extremely tall adolescents. Methods. Data for all girls (n = 12) and boys (n = 9) in our center subjected to bilateral percutaneous epiphysiodesis around the knee who had reached final height were included. Final height predictions were based on hand and wrist X-rays before surgery. Results. When compared to prediction, adult height was reduced by 4.1 ± 0.7 cm in treated girls (P < .001) and 6.4 ± 0.7 cm in treated boys (P < .001) corresponding to a 33.6 ± 3.4% and 33.6 ± 4.2% reduction of remaining growth, respectively. Besides mild to moderate postoperative pain reported in 9 operated individuals, no other side effects were reported. Postoperative X-rays confirmed growth plate closure and absence of leg angulations. Conclusions. Bilateral epiphysiodesis is an effective and safe method to reduce adult height in extremely tall girls and boys.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21151661 PMCID: PMC2997503 DOI: 10.1155/2010/740629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pediatr Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-9848
Inclusion criteria to be offered bilateral percutaneous epiphysiodesis.
| (i) Final height prediction of at least 200 cm in boys and 185 cm in girls | |
| (ii) Remaining predicted growth of at least 8 cm | |
| (iii) Relatively long legs (relative sitting height below the mean) | |
| (iv) A strong patient desire to undergo the treatment |
Clinical data for females and males.
| CA at op (yrs) | BA at op (yrs) | Height at op (cm) | PFH at op (cm) | FH (cm) | PFH-FH (cm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | 13.1 ± 0.2 | 12.3 ± 0.2 | 178.7 ± 0.7 | 190.5 ± 1.1 | 186.4 ± 0.8a | 4.1 ± 0.7 |
| Males | 14.1 ± 0.4 | 13.8 ± 0.2 | 187.7 ± 2.2 | 205.5 ± 1.8 | 199.1 ± 1.5a | 6.4 ± 3.5 |
Chronological age (CA), bone age (BA), and predicted final height (PFH) at operation (op). Final height (FH). Means ± SEM. aP < .001 versus PFH at operation.
Clinical data for individual patients.
| Patient no | CA at op | BA at op | Puberty at op | Height at op | FPH at op | FH | PFH-FH | Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | ||||||||
| 1 | 14.7 | 12.2 | B2 | 179.7 | 191.7 | 186.9 | 4.8 | CTS |
| 2 | 13.8 | 12.8 | B3 | 179.5 | 189.9 | 183.9 | 6.0 | CTS |
| 3 | 13.6 | 13.0 | B2 | 182.2 | 190.7 | 187.8 | 2.9 | CTS |
| 4 | 13.5 | 13.0 | B3 | 178.0 | 186.0 | 182.9 | 3.1 | CTS |
| 5 | 12.5 | 10.2 | B2 | 176.0 | 199.8 | 189.8 | 10.0 | CTS |
| 6 | 13.0 | 12.7 | B4 | 181,1 | 191.0 | 189.5 | 1.5 | CTS |
| 7 | 13.1 | 12.0 | B2 | 180.0 | 193.5 | 189.7 | 3.8 | CTS |
| 8 | 11.6 | 12.6 | B3 | 181.0 | 189.9 | 187.0 | 2.9 | CTS |
| 9 | 12.7 | 12.5 | B3 | 175.7 | 185.4 | 182.8 | 2.6 | Marfan |
| 10 | 13.4 | 12.6 | B2 | 177.3 | 190.2 | 184.9 | 5.3 | CTS |
| 11 | 11.8 | 11.5 | B2 | 173.6 | 188.7 | 183.5 | 5.2 | Marfan |
| 12 | 13.7 | 12.5 | B3 | 180.0 | 189.7 | 188.2 | 1.5 | CTS |
| Males | ||||||||
| 13 | 16.5 | 14.3 | G5 | 192.4 | 205.1 | 201.2 | 3.9 | CTS |
| 14 | 15.2 | 14.0 | G3 | 183.1 | 196.0 | 191.7 | 4.3 | CTS |
| 15 | 14.2 | 14.5 | G4 | 188.4 | 198.6 | 198.3 | 0.3 | CTS |
| 16 | 14.7 | 12.9 | ND | 185.5 | 211.2 | 200.5 | 10.7 | CTS |
| 17 | 13.7 | 14.2 | G5 | 199.5 | 212.8 | 208.5 | 4.3 | CTS |
| 18 | 13.7 | 13.9 | G3 | 187.8 | 207.0 | 199.0 | 8.0 | CTS |
| 19 | 14.5 | 14.1 | G4 | 189.0 | 204.0 | 197.5 | 6.5 | CTS |
| 20 | 12.3 | 12.3 | G1 | 175.3 | 205.5 | 195.3 | 10.2 | Marfan |
| 21 | 12.2 | 13.8 | G5 | 187.9 | 209.6 | 200.2 | 9.4 | Klinfelter |
Chronological age (CA, yrs), bone age (BA, yrs), puberty (Tanner pubertal stage, breast (B) for girls and gonad (G) for boys), height (cm), and predicted final height (PFH, cm) at time of epiphysiodesis operation (op). Final height (FH, cm) and individual diagnosis (constitutional tall stature (CT), Marfan Syndrome (Marfan), and Klinefelter Syndrome (Klinefelter)).
Figure 1Predicted growth (Pred growth), increase in height (Inc Ht), increase in sitting height (inc SH), and increase in leg length (leg growth) from time of surgery.
Figure 2Distribution of patients based on height reductions versus predictions in girls and boys.
Figure 3Reduction of predicted final height as a function of bone age at time of surgery. In both girls and boys, a negative correlation was found between bone age and reduction of predicted final height.
Figure 4Relative sitting height as a function of bone age in girls (a) and boys (b). For individual patients, the symbols illustrate the relative sitting height and bone age at time of surgery and at adult height. The hatched horizontal lines indicate the mean relative sitting heights for the normal population.