Literature DB >> 21151417

The views of primary care physicians on health risks from electromagnetic fields.

Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff1, Kristina Heyer, Bernd Kowall, Jürgen Breckenkamp, Oliver Razum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out what primary care physicians in Germany think about the possible health risks of electromagnetic fields (EMF) and how they deal with this topic in discussions with patients.
METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to a nationwide, representative sample drawn from the regional associations of statutory health insurance physicians in Germany, consisting of 2795 primary care physicians (7% random sample of the total number in the country). 435 of them returned four-page questionnaires (response rate, 23.3%), and 456 returned a one-page questionnaire (response rate, 49.1%). They were asked about their views on the health risks of electromagnetic fields and about their experience with patients on this topic.
RESULTS: 61.4% of the primary care physicians reported having discussed the possible health risks of electromagnetic fields with at least one patient. In 73.4% of these discussions, the patient raised the subject first and presumed that such risks do, in fact, exist. Among all discussions in which the patient expressed this concern, the physician considered the association to be plausible only 24.1% of the time. In half of all consultations in which EMF was discussed as a possible danger, the physician recommended some type of protective measure. The most frequent recommendation was to remove electrical equipment; the second most frequent, to move to another location. The physicians' answers to the questionnaires revealed a poor knowledge of the properties and risks of electromagnetic fields.
CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians often discuss the putative health risks of electromagnetic fields with their patients, yet their recommendations very often are not evidence-based and might have major consequences in their patients' lives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21151417      PMCID: PMC2999946          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  10 in total

1.  Does "electromagnetic pollution" cause illness? An inquiry among Austrian general practitioners.

Authors:  Norbert Leitgeb; Jörg Schröttner; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2005-05

2.  Possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health--opinion of the scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks (SCENIHR).

Authors:  Anders Ahlbom; James Bridges; René de Seze; Lena Hillert; Jukka Juutilainen; Mats-Olof Mattsson; Georg Neubauer; Joachim Schüz; Myrtill Simko; Katja Bromen
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  German wide cross sectional survey on health impacts of electromagnetic fields in the view of general practitioners.

Authors:  Bernd Kowall; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Kristina Heyer; Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Are environmental medicine problems relevant in Switzerland?

Authors:  Anke Huss; Joachim Küchenhoff; Andreas Bircher; Markus Niederer; Josef Tremp; Roger Waeber; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 5.  Mobile phones and brain tumours: a review of epidemiological research.

Authors:  R J Croft; R J McKenzie; I Inyang; G P Benke; V Anderson; M J Abramson
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.430

6.  Clinical environmental medicine.

Authors:  Caroline Herr; Isabelle Otterbach; Dennis Nowak; Claudia Hornberg; Thomas Eikmann; Gerhard Andreas Wiesmüller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany.

Authors:  M Blettner; B Schlehofer; J Breckenkamp; B Kowall; S Schmiedel; U Reis; P Potthoff; J Schüz; G Berg-Beckhoff
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  G Berg-Beckhoff; M Blettner; B Kowall; J Breckenkamp; B Schlehofer; S Schmiedel; C Bornkessel; U Reis; P Potthoff; J Schüz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 9.  Workgroup report: base stations and wireless networks-radiofrequency (RF) exposures and health consequences.

Authors:  Peter A Valberg; T Emilie van Deventer; Michael H Repacholi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields--a survey among general practitioners.

Authors:  Anke Huss; Martin Röösli
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): a systematic review of identifying criteria.

Authors:  Christos Baliatsas; Irene Van Kamp; Erik Lebret; G James Rubin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  General practitioners' knowledge and concern about electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Pia Veldt Larsen; Bernd Kowall
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Modifying health behavior to prevent cardiovascular diseases: a nationwide survey among German primary care physicians.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Katharina Diehl; Christina Bock; Raphael M Herr; Manfred Mayer; Tatiana Görig
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.