PURPOSE: To compare a fibrin-targeted, high relaxivity gadolinium tetramer, EP-2104R, in terms of magnitude of contrast enhancement (CE) and temporal time course, to a conventional extracellular gadolinium chelate, in a brain glioma model at 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Six rats were evaluated, with each animal receiving (for separate studies) 0.05 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd DTPA or Magnevist) and 0.0125 mmol/kg of EP-2104R, with the 2 magnetic resonance examinations separated in each animal by 24 hours. The compound (EP-2104R) was synthesized using published methodology, being comprised of an 11 amino acid peptide derivatized at both the C- and N-termini with Gd-DOTA-like (Dotarem-like) moieties. T1-weighted scans were acquired precontrast and for 5 consecutive 2-minute intervals postcontrast, and subsequently at 15 and 20 minutes postcontrast. RESULTS: Maximum tumor contrast-to-noise and CE both occurred at 1 minute versus at 5 minutes following administration of Gd DTPA versus EP-2104R, respectively. Utilizing an equivalent dose on a Gd ion per body weight basis, signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise, and CE were greater for EP-2104R at all time points postcontrast, yielding overall statistically significantly greater levels of all 3 parameters with the latter. With EP-2104R, improvements in CE ranged between 87% and 391%, increasing at each measured time postcontrast with the exception of a slight decrease from 15 to 20 minutes postadministration. Histopathology confirmed, using immunofluorescence technique, abnormally increased fibrin within the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significantly greater brain tumor enhancement was noted with greater lesion enhancement at all observed time points postcontrast for EP-2104R utilizing an equivalent concentration to Gd DTPA on a per gadolinium ion basis. These findings together with the prolonged time course of enhancement suggest possible fibrin-binding and altered distribution kinetics.
PURPOSE: To compare a fibrin-targeted, high relaxivity gadolinium tetramer, EP-2104R, in terms of magnitude of contrast enhancement (CE) and temporal time course, to a conventional extracellular gadolinium chelate, in a brain glioma model at 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Six rats were evaluated, with each animal receiving (for separate studies) 0.05 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd DTPA or Magnevist) and 0.0125 mmol/kg of EP-2104R, with the 2 magnetic resonance examinations separated in each animal by 24 hours. The compound (EP-2104R) was synthesized using published methodology, being comprised of an 11 amino acid peptide derivatized at both the C- and N-termini with Gd-DOTA-like (Dotarem-like) moieties. T1-weighted scans were acquired precontrast and for 5 consecutive 2-minute intervals postcontrast, and subsequently at 15 and 20 minutes postcontrast. RESULTS: Maximum tumor contrast-to-noise and CE both occurred at 1 minute versus at 5 minutes following administration of Gd DTPA versus EP-2104R, respectively. Utilizing an equivalent dose on a Gd ion per body weight basis, signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise, and CE were greater for EP-2104R at all time points postcontrast, yielding overall statistically significantly greater levels of all 3 parameters with the latter. With EP-2104R, improvements in CE ranged between 87% and 391%, increasing at each measured time postcontrast with the exception of a slight decrease from 15 to 20 minutes postadministration. Histopathology confirmed, using immunofluorescence technique, abnormally increased fibrin within the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significantly greater brain tumor enhancement was noted with greater lesion enhancement at all observed time points postcontrast for EP-2104R utilizing an equivalent concentration to Gd DTPA on a per gadolinium ion basis. These findings together with the prolonged time course of enhancement suggest possible fibrin-binding and altered distribution kinetics.
Authors: L Chaabane; L Tei; L Miragoli; L Lattuada; M von Wronski; F Uggeri; V Lorusso; S Aime Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Dean B Percy; Emeline J Ribot; Yuhua Chen; Catherine McFadden; Carmen Simedrea; Patricia S Steeg; Ann F Chambers; Paula J Foster Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Iliyana Atanasova; Mozhdeh Sojoodi; Helena S Leitão; Sergei Shuvaev; Carlos F G C Geraldes; Ricard Masia; Alexander S Guimaraes; Kenneth K Tanabe; Bryan C Fuchs; Peter Caravan Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 6.016