Literature DB >> 21150703

Media appeals by pediatric patients for living donors and the impact on a transplant center.

Priya S Verghese1, Catherine A Garvey, Michael S Mauer, Arthur J Matas.   

Abstract

Little is published regarding the effect of advertising for kidney donors on transplant centers. At our center, families of nine children used media appeals. Per candidate, there were 8 to 260 potential donor calls, 92 (11.6%) were medically ineligible, 326 (41.1%) voluntarily did not proceed or an alternate donor had been approved, 38 (4.8%) were ABO incompatible, and 327 (41.1%) had positive crossmatch or unsuitable human leukocyte antigens. Media appeals resulted in four living donor transplants and five nondirected donors to other candidates, and we made directed changes in our center. The ethical debate of advertising for organ donors continues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21150703      PMCID: PMC3565833          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182063066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  7 in total

1.  20 years or more of follow-up of living kidney donors.

Authors:  J S Najarian; B M Chavers; L E McHugh; A J Matas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Survival advantage of pediatric recipients of a first kidney transplant among children awaiting kidney transplantation.

Authors:  D L Gillen; C O Stehman-Breen; J M Smith; R A McDonald; B A Warady; J R Brandt; C S Wong
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Overview of pediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  T E Nevins
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Long-term consequences of kidney donation.

Authors:  Hassan N Ibrahim; Robert Foley; LiPing Tan; Tyson Rogers; Robert F Bailey; Hongfei Guo; Cynthia R Gross; Arthur J Matas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Single-center experience of unrelated living-donor renal transplantation in the cyclosporine era.

Authors:  K Park; Y S Kim; E M Lee; H Y Lee; D S Han
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1992

Review 6.  Management of the highly sensitized patient.

Authors:  Frans H J Claas; Ilias I N Doxiadis
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 7.486

7.  Living related and unrelated donors for kidney transplantation. A 28-year experience.

Authors:  A M D'Alessandro; H W Sollinger; S J Knechtle; M Kalayoglu; W A Kisken; D T Uehling; T D Moon; E M Messing; R C Bruskewitz; J D Pirsch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.969

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric kidney transplantation: a historical review.

Authors:  Priya S Verghese
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Live donor champion: finding live kidney donors by separating the advocate from the patient.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Jonathan C Berger; Reside Lorie Ros; Lauren M Kucirka; Neha A Deshpande; Brian J Boyarsky; Robert A Montgomery; Erin C Hall; Nathan T James; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.