Literature DB >> 21149895

STAT3, HIF-1, glucose addiction and Warburg effect.

James E Darnell1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21149895      PMCID: PMC3034174          DOI: 10.18632/aging.100239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


× No keyword cloud information.
Oncogenes as the center of cancer research focused attention 30 years ago on signal transduction especially tyrosine phosphorylation. Discovery that the Jun oncoprotein was a site-specific DNA binding protein demanded a connection of signaling abnormalities with transcriptional control [1]. The cytokine responsive Jak-STAT pathway, discovered through studying α-interferon activation of STATs 1 and 2 by the Jak tyrosine kinases (Tyk2, Jak1, Jak2) was soon broadened to include the other five STATs [2]. The first description of STAT3 in 1994 [3] raised suspicion in the direction of cancer because IL-6 and EGF, already recognized to have cancer connections, were the originally recognized ligands that activated the STAT3 homodimer. Less than a year later Richard Jove and colleagues made a convincing first link between STAT3 and oncogenesis [4]. Src-transformed cell lines all had persistently active STAT3 that was found to be required for Src-dependent oncogenic transformation of cultured cells [5,6]. Perhaps half or more of human tumors have long since been documented to contain persistently active STAT3 and human tumor cell lines depend on STAT3 for continued rapid growth and avoidance of apoptosis [7]. So while a STAT3 cancer connection has been extensively documented, what precisely does STAT3 do to promote or sustain cancer? Much work on STAT3 gene targets supports an anti-apoptotic role for STAT3 as well as a positive affect on cell growth. Now, low and behold, STAT3 appears to be involved with the earliest recognized metabolic abnormality of cancer cells, energy derivation through glycolysis. Valeria Poli and a host of colleagues [8] have published a synthesis of previously established results plus many new experiments to provide convincing evidence that STAT3 transcriptional activity has an important role in establishing the addiction of tumor cells to glycolytic energy derivation and attendant glucose dependence - the Warburg effect [9, 10]. Most of the new experiments [8] use mice in which the wild type STAT3 gene is replaced by a mutation originally produced in our laboratory. We designed a STAT3 molecule we thought might provide constitutive activity by inserting cysteines in a relatively unstructured region of the SH2 domain [11]. Believing we had such a mutation because of high transcriptional signals without cytokine stimulation by the transfected mutant compared to wild type, Jackie Bromberg went on to show this mutant protein, named STAT3C, was capable of transforming cultured, partially transformed fibroblasts (NIH3T3 and rat 3Y1 cells). These transformed cells grew into tumors in nude mice. Many laboratories around the world have used the STAT3C construct that consistently augments transformation as we had found. However, we never obtained (attempts were made) to get a Y705F mutant of STAT3C and did not demonstrate therefore that the mutant required phosphorylation of Y705 just as does the wild type in order to function as a oncogene. Peter Shaw however has corrected our error. STAT3C indeed requires Y705 phosphorylation to be active [12]. Shaw and Li showed that the STAT3C phosphodimer binds DNA better than the wild type, a characteristic that allows it to remain phosphorylated in the nucleus for a longer period of time after activation. Thus STAT3C is simply what the bacterial geneticists were calling an “up” mutation several decades ago. There is still no dispute that STAT3C can act as a cooperating oncogene. And Demaria et al. [8] show definitive effects in MEFs (mouse embryo fibroblasts) of STAT3C/C compared to STAT3 WT including presence in the cell nucleus without a known cytokine activation, longer nuclear retention after IL-6 treatment, faster growth, and resistance to apoptosis induced by four different agents. The activity of STAT3C is presumably due to the low level of STAT3 activation of cells growing in normal serum containing medium, a situation proven earlier by blocking phosphatase activity in the absence of a cytokine ligand and observing STAT1 and STAT3 DNA binding [13,14]. The Warburg type tumor metabolism in STAT3C/C cells depends on an increase in levels of HIF1 α that is at least partly due to increased STAT3 dependent transcription shown earlier by Niu et al. [15] with further new evidence in STAT3C/C MEFs. And HIF1α increases transcription of all known glycolytic enzymes. STAT3c/c activity also increases mRNA for a set of proteins, including PDK-l (pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1) which blocks the shuttling of pyruvate into the citric acid cycle in mitochondria sending it into the glycolytic pathway with resulting increased lactic acid production. With the increased dependence on glycolysis STAT3C/C cells require high glucose to avoid apoptosis. A decreased mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation attendant to presence of STAT3C/C likely depends on a lowered amount of mRNA for mitochondrial proteins, e.g. ATP synthase, for the G subunit of the mitochondrial FO complex, for fumarate hydratase. The authors discuss the recent findings of Andy Larner and David Levy [16,17] that establish the presence of non-tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 in mitochondria that plays a required role in transformation by the Ras oncogene. It is the phosphorylation of serine 727, which in the nucleus is required for maximal transcriptional stimulation, that is important in both the Ras transformation of cells as well as in the maximal functioning of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. A major point made in the Demaria et al. paper is that the metabolic effect brought about by phosphorylating tyrosine 705 activates STAT3 in the cell nucleus (as must occur at a low level in STAT3C/C) is a separate set of events from the serine 727 phosphorylation inside the mitochondria. Thus there is no contradiction between the two sets of findings but emphasizes STAT3 has multiple roles in cell transformation. The powerful message of the newest results is that STAT3 is involved in the time-honored characteristic of cancer cells, dependence on glycolytic energy derivation.
  16 in total

1.  On the origin of cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The STATs of cancer--new molecular targets come of age.

Authors:  Hua Yu; Richard Jove
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Stat3 as an oncogene.

Authors:  J F Bromberg; M H Wrzeszczynska; G Devgan; Y Zhao; R G Pestell; C Albanese; J E Darnell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Stat3 activation is required for cellular transformation by v-src.

Authors:  J F Bromberg; C M Horvath; D Besser; W W Lathem; J E Darnell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Stat3 activation by Src induces specific gene regulation and is required for cell transformation.

Authors:  J Turkson; T Bowman; R Garcia; E Caldenhoven; R P De Groot; R Jove
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  STATs and gene regulation.

Authors:  J E Darnell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A nuclear tyrosine phosphatase downregulates interferon-induced gene expression.

Authors:  M David; P M Grimley; D S Finbloom; A C Larner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Oxidative stress triggers STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Carballo; M Conde; R El Bekay; J Martín-Nieto; M J Camacho; J Monteseirín; J Conde; F J Bedoya; F Sobrino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-06-18       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Enhanced DNA-binding activity of a Stat3-related protein in cells transformed by the Src oncoprotein.

Authors:  C L Yu; D J Meyer; G S Campbell; A C Larner; C Carter-Su; J Schwartz; R Jove
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6.

Authors:  Z Zhong; Z Wen; J E Darnell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  20 in total

1.  Cancer cells metabolically "fertilize" the tumor microenvironment with hydrogen peroxide, driving the Warburg effect: implications for PET imaging of human tumors.

Authors:  Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Zhao Lin; Casey Trimmer; Neal Flomenberg; Chenguang Wang; Stephanos Pavlides; Richard G Pestell; Anthony Howell; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Ectopic NGAL expression can alter sensitivity of breast cancer cells to EGFR, Bcl-2, CaM-K inhibitors and the plant natural product berberine.

Authors:  William H Chappell; Stephen L Abrams; Richard A Franklin; Michelle M LaHair; Giuseppe Montalto; Melchiorre Cervello; Alberto M Martelli; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Saverio Candido; Massimo Libra; Jerry Polesel; Renato Talamini; Michele Milella; Agostino Tafuri; Linda S Steelman; James A McCubrey
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  The real face of HIF1α in the tumor process.

Authors:  Matthias Kappler; Helge Taubert; Johannes Schubert; Dirk Vordermark; Alexander W Eckert
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Metabolic Strategies for Inhibiting Cancer Development.

Authors:  Philippe Icard; Mauro Loi; Zherui Wu; Antonin Ginguay; Hubert Lincet; Edouard Robin; Antoine Coquerel; Diana Berzan; Ludovic Fournel; Marco Alifano
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  The "Sharp" blade against HIF-mediated metastasis.

Authors:  Ivano Amelio; Gerry Melino
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Involvement of Src in the Adaptation of Cancer Cells under Microenvironmental Stresses.

Authors:  A K M Mahbub Hasan; Takashi Ijiri; Ken-Ichi Sato
Journal:  J Signal Transduct       Date:  2012-09-03

7.  No evidence for a shift in pyruvate kinase PKM1 to PKM2 expression during tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Katharina Bluemlein; Nana-Maria Grüning; René G Feichtinger; Hans Lehrach; Barbara Kofler; Markus Ralser
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2011-05

8.  NCI's provocative questions on cancer: some answers to ignite discussion.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2011-12

Review 9.  Recent discoveries in the cycling, growing and aging of the p53 field.

Authors:  James A McCubrey; Zoya N Demidenko
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 10.  Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR cascade inhibitors: how mutations can result in therapy resistance and how to overcome resistance.

Authors:  James A McCubrey; Linda S Steelman; William H Chappell; Stephen L Abrams; Richard A Franklin; Giuseppe Montalto; Melchiorre Cervello; Massimo Libra; Saverio Candido; Grazia Malaponte; Maria C Mazzarino; Paolo Fagone; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Jörg Bäsecke; Sanja Mijatovic; Danijela Maksimovic-Ivanic; Michele Milella; Agostino Tafuri; Francesca Chiarini; Camilla Evangelisti; Lucio Cocco; Alberto M Martelli
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.