Literature DB >> 21149728

DNA tandem repeat instability in the Escherichia coli chromosome is stimulated by mismatch repair at an adjacent CAG·CTG trinucleotide repeat.

John K Blackwood1, Ewa A Okely, Rabaab Zahra, John K Eykelenboom, David R F Leach.   

Abstract

Approximately half the human genome is composed of repetitive DNA sequences classified into microsatellites, minisatellites, tandem repeats, and dispersed repeats. These repetitive sequences have coevolved within the genome but little is known about their potential interactions. Trinucleotide repeats (TNRs) are a subclass of microsatellites that are implicated in human disease. Expansion of CAG·CTG TNRs is responsible for Huntington disease, myotonic dystrophy, and a number of spinocerebellar ataxias. In yeast DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation has been proposed to be associated with instability and chromosome fragility at these sites and replication fork reversal (RFR) to be involved either in promoting or in preventing instability. However, the molecular basis for chromosome fragility of repetitive DNA remains poorly understood. Here we show that a CAG·CTG TNR array stimulates instability at a 275-bp tandem repeat located 6.3 kb away on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Remarkably, this stimulation is independent of both DNA double-strand break repair (DSBR) and RFR but is dependent on a functional mismatch repair (MMR) system. Our results provide a demonstration, in a simple model system, that MMR at one type of repetitive DNA has the potential to influence the stability of another. Furthermore, the mechanism of this stimulation places a limit on the universality of DSBR or RFR models of instability and chromosome fragility at CAG·CTG TNR sequences. Instead, our data suggest that explanations of chromosome fragility should encompass the possibility of chromosome gaps formed during MMR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21149728      PMCID: PMC3012478          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1012906108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  OGG1 initiates age-dependent CAG trinucleotide expansion in somatic cells.

Authors:  Irina V Kovtun; Yuan Liu; Magnar Bjoras; Arne Klungland; Samuel H Wilson; Cynthia T McMurray
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Guy-Franck Richard; Alix Kerrest; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  uvrD mutations enhance tandem repeat deletion in the Escherichia coli chromosome via SOS induction of the RecF recombination pathway.

Authors:  H Bierne; M Seigneur; S D Ehrlich; B Michel
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 4.  Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Sandra G Durkin; Ryan L Ragland; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-27

5.  Trinucleotide repeats that expand in human disease form hairpin structures in vitro.

Authors:  A M Gacy; G Goellner; N Juranić; S Macura; C T McMurray
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-05-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology.

Authors:  P Modrich; R Lahue
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  SbcCD causes a double-strand break at a DNA palindrome in the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  John K Eykelenboom; John K Blackwood; Ewa Okely; David R F Leach
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  CTG repeat instability and size variation timing in DNA repair-deficient mice.

Authors:  Cédric Savouret; Edith Brisson; Jeroen Essers; Roland Kanaar; Albert Pastink; Hein te Riele; Claudine Junien; Geneviève Gourdon
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  Human chromosome fragility.

Authors:  T Lukusa; J P Fryns
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-12-03

10.  SRS2 and SGS1 prevent chromosomal breaks and stabilize triplet repeats by restraining recombination.

Authors:  Alix Kerrest; Ranjith P Anand; Rangapriya Sundararajan; Rodrigo Bermejo; Giordano Liberi; Bernard Dujon; Catherine H Freudenreich; Guy-Franck Richard
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  On the wrong DNA track: Molecular mechanisms of repeat-mediated genome instability.

Authors:  Alexandra N Khristich; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Establishment of genetic tools for genomic DNA engineering of Halomonas sp. KM-1, a bacterium with potential for biochemical production.

Authors:  Ayaka Tsuji; Yasuko Takei; Yoshinao Azuma
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.352

3.  Replication stress at microsatellites causes DNA double-strand breaks and break-induced replication.

Authors:  Rujuta Yashodhan Gadgil; Eric J Romer; Caitlin C Goodman; S Dean Rider; French J Damewood; Joanna R Barthelemy; Kazuo Shin-Ya; Helmut Hanenberg; Michael Leffak
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Chromosomal directionality of DNA mismatch repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A M Mahedi Hasan; David R F Leach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Bacterial genome instability.

Authors:  Elise Darmon; David R F Leach
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Patterns of evolutionary conservation of microsatellites (SSRs) suggest a faster rate of genome evolution in Hymenoptera than in Diptera.

Authors:  Eckart Stolle; Jonathan H Kidner; Robin F A Moritz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Instability of (CTG)n•(CAG)n trinucleotide repeats and DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Guoqi Liu; Michael Leffak
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 7.133

8.  Escherichia coli frameshift mutation rate depends on the chromosomal context but not on the GATC content near the mutation site.

Authors:  Mariana A Martina; Elisa M E Correa; Carlos E Argaraña; José L Barra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Alternative DNA Structures In Vivo: Molecular Evidence and Remaining Questions.

Authors:  Lucie Poggi; Guy-Franck Richard
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 11.056

10.  Highly specific contractions of a single CAG/CTG trinucleotide repeat by TALEN in yeast.

Authors:  Guy-Franck Richard; David Viterbo; Varun Khanna; Valentine Mosbach; Lauriane Castelain; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.