Literature DB >> 21149672

Immunosuppressive therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a prospective randomized multicenter phase III trial comparing antithymocyte globulin plus cyclosporine with best supportive care--SAKK 33/99.

Jakob R Passweg1, Aristoteles A N Giagounidis, Mathew Simcock, Carlo Aul, Christiane Dobbelstein, Michael Stadler, Gert Ossenkoppele, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann, Kristina Schilling, André Tichelli, Arnold Ganser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Immunosuppressive treatment is reported to improve cytopenia in some patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Combined antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CSA) is most effective in patients with immune-mediated marrow failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial was designed to assess the impact of immunosuppression on hematopoiesis, transfusion requirements, transformation, and survival in patients with MDS randomly assigned to 15 mg/kg of horse ATG for 5 days and oral CSA for 180 days (ATG+CSA) or best supportive care (BSC), stratified by treatment center and International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk score. Primary end point was best hematologic response at 6 months. Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2 and transfusion dependency of less than 2 years in duration.
RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2006, 45 patients received ATG+CSA (median age, 62 years; range, 23 to 75 years; 56% men) and 43 patients received BSC (median age, 65 years; range, 24 to 76 years; 81% men). IPSS score was low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, high, and not evaluable in eight, 24, seven, one, and five patients on ATG+CSA, respectively, and eight, 25, five, zero, and five patients on BSC, respectively. Refractory anemia, refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts, refractory anemia with excess of blasts (RAEB) -I, RAEB-II, and hypoplastic disease were present in 21, six, nine, zero, and nine patients on ATG+CSA, respectively, and 18, eight, 11, two, and four patients on BSC, respectively. By month 6, 13 of 45 patients on ATG+CSA had a hematologic response compared with four of 43 patients on BSC (P = .0156). Two-year transformation-free survival (TFS) rates were 46% (95% CI, 28% to 62%) and 55% (95% CI, 34% to 70%) for ATG+CSA and BSC patients, respectively (P = .730), whereas overall survival (OS) estimates were 49% (95% CI, 31% to 66%) and 63% (95% CI, 42% to 78%), respectively (P = .828).
CONCLUSION: This open-label randomized phase III trial demonstrates that ATG+CSA treatment seems to be associated with hematologic response in a subset of patients without apparent impact on TFS and OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21149672     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  46 in total

1.  [Myelodysplastic syndromes].

Authors:  A Giagounidis
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Rare occurrence of DNMT3A mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Felicitas Thol; Claudia Winschel; Andrea Lüdeking; Haiyang Yun; Inna Friesen; Frederik Damm; Katharina Wagner; Jürgen Krauter; Michael Heuser; Arnold Ganser
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Genetic predisposition syndromes: when should they be considered in the work-up of MDS?

Authors:  Daria V Babushok; Monica Bessler
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

Authors:  Nirali N Shah; Ulrike Bacher; Terry Fry; Katherine R Calvo; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Diane C Arthur; Roger Kurlander; Kristin Baird; Barbara Wise; Sergio Giralt; Michael Bishop; Nancy M Hardy; Alan S Wayne
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 10.047

5.  Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the Elderly: Treatment Options and Personalized Management.

Authors:  Sonja Burgstaller; Petra Wiesinger; Reinhard Stauder
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Are mild/moderate acquired idiopathic aplastic anaemia and low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome one or two diseases or both and how should it/they be treated?

Authors:  S Nakao; R P Gale
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Current treatment algorithm for the management of lower-risk MDS.

Authors:  Aristoteles Giagounidis
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

8.  The use of immunosuppressive therapy in MDS: clinical outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort.

Authors:  Maximilian Stahl; Michelle DeVeaux; Theo de Witte; Judith Neukirchen; Mikkael A Sekeres; Andrew M Brunner; Gail J Roboz; David P Steensma; Vijaya R Bhatt; Uwe Platzbecker; Thomas Cluzeau; Pedro H Prata; Raphaël Itzykson; Pierre Fenaux; Amir T Fathi; Alexandra Smith; Ulrich Germing; Ellen K Ritchie; Vivek Verma; Aziz Nazha; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Thomas Prebet; Valeria Santini; Steven D Gore; Rami S Komrokji; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-07-24

Review 9.  [Myelodysplastic syndromes. Epidemiology, molecular and morphological characteristics and risk stratification].

Authors:  A H Schmitt-Graeff; M J Müller; P Fisch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 10.  Immunomodulatory treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, and alemtuzumab.

Authors:  Ankur R Parikh; Matthew J Olnes; A John Barrett
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.