UNLABELLED: The efficacy of differing routes of administration of 18F-6-fluoro-N-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl] pyridine-3-carboxamide (18F-MEL050), a new benzamide-based PET radiotracer for imaging regional lymph node metastasis in melanoma, was assessed. METHODS: B16-Black/6 metastatic melanoma cells harboring an mCherry transgene were implanted into the left-upper-foot surface of 49 C57 Black/6 mice as a model of popliteal lymph node (PLN) metastasis. Ultrasound scanning of the left PLN was performed at baseline and in combination with 18F-MEL050 PET on days 5, 9, and 14. Mice were divided into 2 groups to compare the results of tracer administration either subcutaneously at the tumor site (local) or in the lateral tail vein (systemic). After PET on each imaging day, 5 mice per group-including any with evidence of metastasis-were sacrificed for ex vivo validation studies including assessment of retained radioactivity and presence of the mCherry transgene as a surrogate of nodal tumor burden. RESULTS: Nine mice were judged as positive for PLN metastasis by ultrasound at day 5, and 8 PLNs were positive on 18F-MEL050 PET, 3 after systemic and 5 after local administration. Ex vivo analysis showed that ultrasound correctly identified 90% of positive PLNs, with 1 false-positive. 18F-MEL050 PET correctly identified 60% of positive PLNs after systemic administration and 100% after local administration with no false-positive results by either route. The average node-to-background ratio for positive PLNs was 6.8 in the systemic-administration group and correlated with disease burden. In the local-administration group, the mean uptake ratio was 48, without clear relation to metastatic burden. Additional sites of metastatic disease were also correctly identified by 18F-MEL050 PET. CONCLUSION: In addition to its potential for systemic staging, perilesional administration of 18F-MEL050 may allow sensitive and specific, noninvasive identification of regional lymph node metastasis in pigmented malignant melanomas.
UNLABELLED: The efficacy of differing routes of administration of 18F-6-fluoro-N-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl] pyridine-3-carboxamide (18F-MEL050), a new benzamide-based PET radiotracer for imaging regional lymph node metastasis in melanoma, was assessed. METHODS: B16-Black/6 metastatic melanoma cells harboring an mCherry transgene were implanted into the left-upper-foot surface of 49 C57 Black/6 mice as a model of popliteal lymph node (PLN) metastasis. Ultrasound scanning of the left PLN was performed at baseline and in combination with 18F-MEL050 PET on days 5, 9, and 14. Mice were divided into 2 groups to compare the results of tracer administration either subcutaneously at the tumor site (local) or in the lateral tail vein (systemic). After PET on each imaging day, 5 mice per group-including any with evidence of metastasis-were sacrificed for ex vivo validation studies including assessment of retained radioactivity and presence of the mCherry transgene as a surrogate of nodal tumor burden. RESULTS: Nine mice were judged as positive for PLN metastasis by ultrasound at day 5, and 8 PLNs were positive on 18F-MEL050 PET, 3 after systemic and 5 after local administration. Ex vivo analysis showed that ultrasound correctly identified 90% of positive PLNs, with 1 false-positive. 18F-MEL050 PET correctly identified 60% of positive PLNs after systemic administration and 100% after local administration with no false-positive results by either route. The average node-to-background ratio for positive PLNs was 6.8 in the systemic-administration group and correlated with disease burden. In the local-administration group, the mean uptake ratio was 48, without clear relation to metastatic burden. Additional sites of metastatic disease were also correctly identified by 18F-MEL050 PET. CONCLUSION: In addition to its potential for systemic staging, perilesional administration of 18F-MEL050 may allow sensitive and specific, noninvasive identification of regional lymph node metastasis in pigmented malignant melanomas.
Authors: Małgorzata Solnik; Natalia Paduszyńska; Anna M Czarnecka; Kamil J Synoradzki; Yacoub A Yousef; Tomasz Chorągiewicz; Robert Rejdak; Mario Damiano Toro; Sandrine Zweifel; Katarzyna Dyndor; Michał Fiedorowicz Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Erik H J G Aarntzen; Mangala Srinivas; Caius G Radu; Cornelis J A Punt; Otto C Boerman; Carl G Figdor; Wim J G Oyen; I Jolanda M de Vries Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Cameron N Johnstone; Yvonne E Smith; Yuan Cao; Allan D Burrows; Ryan S N Cross; Xiawei Ling; Richard P Redvers; Judy P Doherty; Bedrich L Eckhardt; Anthony L Natoli; Christina M Restall; Erin Lucas; Helen B Pearson; Siddhartha Deb; Kara L Britt; Alexandra Rizzitelli; Jason Li; Judith H Harmey; Normand Pouliot; Robin L Anderson Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 5.758
Authors: Ana Carolina B M Martin; Angelina M Fuzer; Marcia R Cominetti; Normand Pouliot; Amanda B Becceneri; James Almada da Silva; Rebeka Tomasin; Delphine Denoyer; Soo-Hyun Kim; Katherine A McIntyre; Helen B Pearson; Belinda Yeo; Aadya Nagpal; Xiawei Ling; Heloisa S Selistre-de-Araújo; Paulo Cézar Vieira Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-08-10
Authors: Adam K Walker; Aeson Chang; Alexandra I Ziegler; Haryana M Dhillon; Janette L Vardy; Erica K Sloan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aadya Nagpal; Richard P Redvers; Xiawei Ling; Scott Ayton; Miriam Fuentes; Elnaz Tavancheh; Irmina Diala; Alshad Lalani; Sherene Loi; Steven David; Robin L Anderson; Yvonne Smith; Delphine Merino; Delphine Denoyer; Normand Pouliot Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 6.466