Literature DB >> 21149346

Process-oriented fidelity research assists in evaluation, adjustment and scaling-up of community-based interventions.

Dennis Pérez1, Pierre Lefèvre, Marta Castro, Lizet Sánchez, María Eugenia Toledo, Veerle Vanlerberghe, Patrick Van der Stuyft.   

Abstract

Fidelity research can help to answer essential questions about the diffusion process of innovative health interventions and provide insights for further scaling-up and institutionalization. This study assessed fidelity and reinvention in the implementation of a community-based control strategy for Aedes aegypti control. The intervention was implemented in 16 study areas in La Lisa, a municipality of Havana, Cuba. Its major components were: organization &amp; management, capacity-building, community work and surveillance. A participatory assessment of process data was performed to determine whether the components and subcomponents were implemented, not-implemented or modified. Frequencies were tabulated over all circumscriptions (lowest level of local government) and the average was calculated for the four components. Spearman Rank correlation coefficients were calculated to explore the relationships between components. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with co-ordinators of the strategy at different levels to identify difficulties encountered in the strategy's implementation. Surveillance was the most implemented component (72.9%) followed by capacity-building (54.7%). Community work and organization &amp; management were less implemented or modified (50% and 45%, respectively). Apart from surveillance and capacity-building, all components are significantly and strongly correlated (Spearman Rank correlation coefficient > 0.70, P < 0.01). If one component is implemented in a circumscription, the other components are also likely to be implemented. It is noticeable that areas which did not undergo organizational changes commonly did not implement community work activities. Within the whole strategy, few activities were added. Scarcely implemented subcomponents were the most innovative. The difficulties encountered during implementation were related to appropriate training and skills, available time, lack of support and commitment to the strategy, lack of motivation of local leadership, and integration of actors and resources. The study showed a wide variability of fidelity in the implementation of the intervention and highlighted challenges for scaling-up and institutionalization of the community-based intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21149346     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  17 in total

1.  Readiness Assessment to Improve Program Implementation: Shifting the Lens to Optimizing Intervention Design.

Authors:  Brian K Bumbarger
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-11

2.  Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts.

Authors:  Julia E Moore; Brian K Bumbarger; Brittany Rhoades Cooper
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2013-06

Review 3.  Measurement of a model of implementation for health care: toward a testable theory.

Authors:  Joan M Cook; Casey O'Donnell; Stephanie Dinnen; James C Coyne; Josef I Ruzek; Paula P Schnurr
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Implementation fidelity of the national malaria control program in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Valéry Ridde; Thomas Druetz; Serge Poppy; Seni Kouanda; Slim Haddad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Promoting development and uptake of health innovations: The Nose to Tail Tool.

Authors:  Archna Gupta; Cathy Thorpe; Onil Bhattacharyya; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-03-16

6.  Figuring out fidelity: a worked example of the methods used to identify, critique and revise the essential elements of a contextualised intervention in health policy agencies.

Authors:  Abby Haynes; Sue Brennan; Sally Redman; Anna Williamson; Gisselle Gallego; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions.

Authors:  Dennis Pérez; Patrick Van der Stuyft; Maríadel Carmen Zabala; Marta Castro; Pierre Lefèvre
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Factors affecting adoption, implementation fidelity, and sustainability of the Redesigned Community Health Fund in Tanzania: a mixed methods protocol for process evaluation in the Dodoma region.

Authors:  Albino Kalolo; Ralf Radermacher; Manfred Stoermer; Menoris Meshack; Manuela De Allegri
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study.

Authors:  Valéry Ridde; Clémentine Rossier; Abdramane B Soura; Fiacre Bazié; Kadidiatou Kadio
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2014-04-16

10.  Protocol for the process evaluation of interventions combining performance-based financing with health equity in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Valéry Ridde; Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay; Aurélia Souares; Julia Lohmann; David Zombré; Jean Louis Koulidiati; Maurice Yaogo; Hervé Hien; Matthew Hunt; Sylvie Zongo; Manuela De Allegri
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.