Literature DB >> 21148662

Randomized trial of angiotensin II-receptor blocker vs. dihydropiridine calcium channel blocker in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with hypertension (J-RHYTHM II study).

Takeshi Yamashita1, Hiroshi Inoue, Ken Okumura, Itsuo Kodama, Yoshifusa Aizawa, Hirotsugu Atarashi, Tohru Ohe, Hiroshi Ohtsu, Takao Kato, Shiro Kamakura, Koichiro Kumagai, Yoshihisa Kurachi, Yukihiro Koretsune, Tetsunori Saikawa, Masayuki Sakurai, Toshiaki Sato, Kaoru Sugi, Haruaki Nakaya, Makoto Hirai, Atsushi Hirayama, Masahiko Fukatani, Hideo Mitamura, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Eiichi Watanabe, Satoshi Ogawa.   

Abstract

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia frequently associated with hypertension. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that lowering blood pressure by angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARB) has more beneficial effects than by conventional calcium channel blockers (CCB) on the frequency of paroxysmal AF with hypertension. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Japanese Rhythm Management Trial II for Atrial Fibrillation (J-RHYTHM II study) is an open-label randomized comparison between an ARB (candesartan) and a CCB (amlodipine) in the treatment of paroxysmal AF associated with hypertension. Using daily transtelephonic monitoring, we examined asymptomatic and symptomatic paroxysmal AF episodes during a maximum 1 year treatment. The primary endpoint was the difference in AF frequency between the pre-treatment period and the final month of the follow-up. The secondary endpoints included cardiovascular events, development of persistent AF, left atrial dimension, and quality-of-life (QOL). The study enrolled 318 patients (66 years, male/female 219/99, 158 in the ARB group and 160 in the CCB group) treated at 48 sites throughout Japan. At baseline, the frequency of AF episodes (days/month) was 3.8 ± 5.0 in the ARB group vs. 4.8 ± 6.3 in the CCB group (not significant). During the follow-up, blood pressure was significantly lower in the CCB group than in the ARB group (P < 0.001). The AF frequency decreased similarly in both groups, and there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the development of persistent AF, changes in left atrial dimension, occurrence of cardiovascular events, or changes in QOL.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal AF and hypertension, treatment of hypertension by candesartan did not have an advantage over amlodipine in the reduction in the frequency of paroxysmal AF (umin CTR C000000427).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21148662     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  28 in total

Review 1.  Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension: Mechanistic, Epidemiologic, and Treatment Parallels.

Authors:  Adedotun A Ogunsua; Amir Y Shaikh; Mohamed Ahmed; David D McManus
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

2.  Aliskiren suppresses atrial electrical and structural remodeling in a canine model of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Akira Satoh; Shinichi Niwano; Hiroe Niwano; Jun Kishihara; Yuya Aoyama; Jun Oikawa; Hidehira Fukaya; Hideaki Tamaki; Junya Ako
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Renin-Angiotensin System and AtrialFibrillation:Understanding the Connection.

Authors:  Marcello Disertori; Silvia Quintarelli
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2011-12-20

Review 5.  Structural and Functional Remodeling of the Left Atrium: Clinical and Therapeutic Implications for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Rajeev Pathak; Dennis H Lau; Rajiv Mahajan; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-12-31

Review 6.  Atrial Remodelling : Role in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Herko Grubitzsch; Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-12-16

7.  Preventive effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on new-onset atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  T Horio; M Akiyama; Y Iwashima; F Yoshihara; S Nakamura; T Tokudome; M Okutsu; H Tanaka; I Komatsubara; N Okimoto; S Kamakura; Y Kawano
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 8.  Angiotensin II and angiotensin 1-7: which is their role in atrial fibrillation?

Authors:  Annamaria Mascolo; Konrad Urbanek; Antonella De Angelis; Maurizio Sessa; Cristina Scavone; Liberato Berrino; Giuseppe Massimo Claudio Rosano; Annalisa Capuano; Francesco Rossi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Modifiable Risk Factors and Atrial Fibrillation: the Quest for a Personalized Approach.

Authors:  Lavinia-Lucia Matei; Calin Siliste; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2021-03

Review 10.  The Role Of Renin Angiotensin System In Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Girish M Nair; Pablo B Nery; Calum J Redpath; David H Birnie
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.