BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Hyperphosphatemia is common among hemodialysis patients. Although prescribed dietary phosphate restriction is a recommended therapy, little is known about the long-term effects on survival. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from the Hemodialysis Study (n = 1751). Prescribed dietary phosphate was recorded at baseline and annually thereafter. Marginal structural proportional hazard models were fit to estimate the adjusted association between dietary phosphate restriction and mortality in the setting of time-dependent confounding. RESULTS: At baseline, prescribed daily phosphate was restricted to levels ≤ 870, 871 to 999, 1000, 1001 to 2000 mg, and not restricted in 300, 314, 307, 297, and 533 participants, respectively. More restrictive prescribed dietary phosphate was associated with poorer indices of nutritional status on baseline analyses and a persistently greater need for nutritional supplementation but not longitudinal changes in caloric or protein intake. On marginal structural analysis, there was a stepwise trend toward greater survival with more liberal phosphate prescription, which reached statistical significance among subjects prescribed 1001 to 2000 mg/d and those with no specified phosphate restriction: hazard ratios (95% CIs) 0.73 (0.54 to 0.97) and 0.71 (0.55 to 0.92), respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested a more pronounced survival benefit of liberal dietary phosphate prescription among nonblacks, participants without hyperphosphatemia, and those not receiving activated vitamin D. CONCLUSIONS:Prescribed dietary phosphate restriction is not associated with improved survival among prevalent hemodialysis patients, and increased level of restriction may be associated with greater mortality particularly in some subgroups.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Hyperphosphatemia is common among hemodialysis patients. Although prescribed dietary phosphate restriction is a recommended therapy, little is known about the long-term effects on survival. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from the Hemodialysis Study (n = 1751). Prescribed dietary phosphate was recorded at baseline and annually thereafter. Marginal structural proportional hazard models were fit to estimate the adjusted association between dietary phosphate restriction and mortality in the setting of time-dependent confounding. RESULTS: At baseline, prescribed daily phosphate was restricted to levels ≤ 870, 871 to 999, 1000, 1001 to 2000 mg, and not restricted in 300, 314, 307, 297, and 533 participants, respectively. More restrictive prescribed dietary phosphate was associated with poorer indices of nutritional status on baseline analyses and a persistently greater need for nutritional supplementation but not longitudinal changes in caloric or protein intake. On marginal structural analysis, there was a stepwise trend toward greater survival with more liberal phosphate prescription, which reached statistical significance among subjects prescribed 1001 to 2000 mg/d and those with no specified phosphate restriction: hazard ratios (95% CIs) 0.73 (0.54 to 0.97) and 0.71 (0.55 to 0.92), respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested a more pronounced survival benefit of liberal dietary phosphate prescription among nonblacks, participants without hyperphosphatemia, and those not receiving activated vitamin D. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribed dietary phosphate restriction is not associated with improved survival among prevalent hemodialysis patients, and increased level of restriction may be associated with greater mortality particularly in some subgroups.
Authors: Ming Teng; Myles Wolf; M Norma Ofsthun; J Michael Lazarus; Miguel A Hernán; Carlos A Camargo; Ravi Thadhani Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-02-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: M Rufino; E de Bonis; M Martín; S Rebollo; B Martín; R Miquel; M Cobo; D Hernández; A Torres; V Lorenzo Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 1998 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Eric W Young; Justin M Albert; Sudtida Satayathum; David A Goodkin; Ronald L Pisoni; Takashi Akiba; Tadao Akizawa; Kiyoshi Kurokawa; Jürgen Bommer; Luis Piera; Friedrich K Port Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Cristina Garagarza; Ana Valente; Cristina Caetano; Telma Oliveira; Pedro Ponce; Ana Paula Silva Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Antonio Alberto Lopes; Lin Tong; Jyothi Thumma; Yun Li; Douglas S Fuller; Hal Morgenstern; Jürgen Bommer; Peter G Kerr; Francesca Tentori; Takashi Akiba; Brenda W Gillespie; Bruce M Robinson; Friedrich K Port; Ronald L Pisoni Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2012-03-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Vidhya Parameswaran; Linda H Ficociello; Ludmila Anderson; Norma J Ofsthun; Christopher Kwoh; Claudy Mullon; Robert J Kossmann; Daniel W Coyne Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Ebele M Umeukeje; Joseph R Merighi; Teri Browne; Jacquelyn N Victoroff; Kausik Umanath; Julia B Lewis; T Alp Ikizler; Kenneth A Wallston; Kerri Cavanaugh Journal: J Ren Nutr Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 3.655