AIMS: We evaluated the applicability and prognostic importance of oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) among outpatients with systolic heart failure (SHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with SHF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45% referred to a heart failure clinic (n= 413) were included in this study. An OGTT was conducted in patients without a history of diabetes. Information on NYHA class, aetiology of SHF, LVEF, treatment, and biochemical parameters were collected at baseline. The survival status was obtained after a median follow-up time of 591 days. Of the 413 patients, 82 (20%) had known diabetes. Of the remaining 331 patients, 227 (69%) agreed to undergo an OGTT. Among the tested subjects, 136 (60%) were classified as having normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 51 (23%) impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 40 (18%) newly diagnosed diabetes. Assuming a similar prevalence of unrecognized diabetes among the patients who refused OGTT, the prevalence of diabetes in the total population was 34%. If only fasting blood glucose had been used, 16 of the 40 newly diagnosed diabetic patients would have been undiagnosed. During follow-up, 24 (29%) patients with known diabetes, 6 (15%) of the newly diagnosed diabetic patients, 9 (18%) of those with IGT, and 13 (9%) patients with NGT died. Patients with diabetes had higher mortality rate compared with non-diabetic patients [multivariate hazard ratio 1.89 (1.02-3.59); P = 0.047]. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to perform diabetes screening using OGTT in outpatients with SHF. A substantial proportion of patients tested were found to have unrecognized diabetes. The presence of diabetes was associated with a higher mortality rate.
AIMS: We evaluated the applicability and prognostic importance of oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) among outpatients with systolic heart failure (SHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with SHF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45% referred to a heart failure clinic (n= 413) were included in this study. An OGTT was conducted in patients without a history of diabetes. Information on NYHA class, aetiology of SHF, LVEF, treatment, and biochemical parameters were collected at baseline. The survival status was obtained after a median follow-up time of 591 days. Of the 413 patients, 82 (20%) had known diabetes. Of the remaining 331 patients, 227 (69%) agreed to undergo an OGTT. Among the tested subjects, 136 (60%) were classified as having normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 51 (23%) impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 40 (18%) newly diagnosed diabetes. Assuming a similar prevalence of unrecognized diabetes among the patients who refused OGTT, the prevalence of diabetes in the total population was 34%. If only fasting blood glucose had been used, 16 of the 40 newly diagnosed diabeticpatients would have been undiagnosed. During follow-up, 24 (29%) patients with known diabetes, 6 (15%) of the newly diagnosed diabeticpatients, 9 (18%) of those with IGT, and 13 (9%) patients with NGT died. Patients with diabetes had higher mortality rate compared with non-diabeticpatients [multivariate hazard ratio 1.89 (1.02-3.59); P = 0.047]. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to perform diabetes screening using OGTT in outpatients with SHF. A substantial proportion of patients tested were found to have unrecognized diabetes. The presence of diabetes was associated with a higher mortality rate.
Authors: Roni Nielsen; Anders Jorsal; Peter Iversen; Lars Poulsen Tolbod; Kirsten Bouchelouche; Jens Sørensen; Hendrik Johannes Harms; Allan Flyvbjerg; Lise Tarnow; Caroline Kistorp; Ida Gustafsson; Hans Erik Bøtker; Henrik Wiggers Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Roni Nielsen; Anders Jorsal; Peter Iversen; Lars Tolbod; Kirsten Bouchelouche; Jens Sørensen; Hendrik Johannes Harms; Allan Flyvbjerg; Hans Erik Bøtker; Henrik Wiggers Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: B B Heinisch; G Vila; M Resl; M Riedl; B Dieplinger; T Mueller; A Luger; G Pacini; M Clodi Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Bert O Eijnde; Paul Dendale; An Lm Stevens; Dominique Hansen; Vincent Vandoren; Rob Westerlaken; An Creemers Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 3.320
Authors: Roni Nielsen; Henrik Wiggers; Henrik Holm Thomsen; Ann Bovin; Jens Refsgaard; Jan Abrahamsen; Niels Møller; Hans Erik Bøtker; Helene Nørrelund Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2016-04-29
Authors: Søren L Kristensen; David Preiss; Pardeep S Jhund; Iain Squire; José Silva Cardoso; Bela Merkely; Felipe Martinez; Randall C Starling; Akshay S Desai; Martin P Lefkowitz; Adel R Rizkala; Jean L Rouleau; Victor C Shi; Scott D Solomon; Karl Swedberg; Michael R Zile; John J V McMurray; Milton Packer Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Pernille Holmager; Michael Egstrup; Ida Gustafsson; Morten Schou; Jordi S Dahl; Lars Melholt Rasmussen; Jacob E Møller; Christian Tuxen; Jens Faber; Caroline Kistorp Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 2.298