| Literature DB >> 21147811 |
Susana Espino1, H Jochen Schenk.
Abstract
The maximum specific hydraulic conductivity (k(max)) of a plant sample is a measure of the ability of a plants' vascular system to transport water and dissolved nutrients under optimum conditions. Precise measurements of k(max) are needed in comparative studies of hydraulic conductivity, as well as for measuring the formation and repair of xylem embolisms. Unstable measurements of k(max) are a common problem when measuring woody plant samples and it is commonly observed that k(max) declines from initially high values, especially when positive water pressure is used to flush out embolisms. This study was designed to test five hypotheses that could potentially explain declines in k(max) under positive pressure: (i) non-steady-state flow; (ii) swelling of pectin hydrogels in inter-vessel pit membranes; (iii) nucleation and coalescence of bubbles at constrictions in the xylem; (iv) physiological wounding responses; and (v) passive wounding responses, such as clogging of the xylem by debris. Prehydrated woody stems from Laurus nobilis (Lauraceae) and Encelia farinosa (Asteraceae) collected from plants grown in the Fullerton Arboretum in Southern California, were used to test these hypotheses using a xylem embolism meter (XYL'EM). Treatments included simultaneous measurements of stem inflow and outflow, enzyme inhibitors, stem-debarking, low water temperatures, different water degassing techniques, and varied concentrations of calcium, potassium, magnesium, and copper salts in aqueous measurement solutions. Stable measurements of k(max) were observed at concentrations of calcium, potassium, and magnesium salts high enough to suppress bubble coalescence, as well as with deionized water that was degassed using a membrane contactor under strong vacuum. Bubble formation and coalescence under positive pressure in the xylem therefore appear to be the main cause for declining k(max) values. Our findings suggest that degassing of water is essential for achieving stable and precise measurements of k(max) through woody plant samples. For complete rehydration of woody samples, incubation in water under vacuum for 24 h is suggested as a reliable technique that avoids bubble problems associated with flushing under high positive pressure.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21147811 PMCID: PMC3022400 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Predicted outcomes of Experimental treatments on the decline of kmax measurements in woody stems, assuming that the mechanism listed in the corresponding column header is operative (see Introduction for further explanations)
| Experimental treatment | Non-steady-state flow | Pectin swelling | Bubbles | Active wounding response | Passive wounding effects |
| Not degassed | o | o | o | o | o |
| Flask-degassed at 30 kPa | o | o | + | o | o |
| Degasser at 30 kPa | o | o | + | o | o |
| Degasser at 3 kPa | o | o | ++ | o | o |
| Hydrated at 3 kPa, degasser at 3 kPa | o | o | ++ | o | o |
| Ice water | o | + | + | + | o |
| Ice water | o | o | + | + | o |
| Bark removed before cutting | o | o | o | + | + |
| KCl, 10 mM | o | ++ | o | o | o |
| KCl, 100 mM | o | ++ | + | o | o |
| KCl, 300 mM | o | ++ | ++ | o | o |
| CaCl2, 10 mM | o | ++ | o | o | o |
| CaCl2, 40 mM | o | ++ | + | o | o |
| CaCl2, 100 mM | o | ++ | ++ | o | o |
| MgSO4, 0.5 mM | o | + | o | o | o |
| MgSO4, 20 mM | o | ++ | + | o | o |
| MgSO4, 50 mM | o | ++ | ++ | o | o |
| (NH4)2SO4, 100 mM | o | o | ++ | o | o |
| Cu(II)SO4, 0.1 mM | o | o | o | + | o |
| Cu(II)SO4, 0.25 mM | o | o | o | + | o |
| 4-HR, 10 mM | o | o | o | + | o |
| Hydroquinone, 10 mM | o | o | o | + | o |
| Degasser, in- and outflow measured | + | o | + | o | o |
Symbols: o=no alleviation predicted; + =some alleviation predicted; ++ =strong alleviation predicted.
Experimental treatment accounts for, but does not alleviate, declines in kmax.
Treatment applied during vase rehydration and during measurement.
Methods used in representative studies of maximum hydraulic conductivity through stem and root samples
| Reference | Sample length (cm) | Measured inflow or outflow? | Filtered and degassed? | Measuring pressure (kPa) | Flushing pressure and flushing time | Ionic composition |
| Various | Out | 0.22 μm filter, degassed5 | ≤105 | 170 kPa, repeated flushes to | 10 mM NaCl, 0.05% formaldehyde | |
| 10–15 | Out* | 0.22 μm filter, degassed5 | ≤10 | 175 kPa, 20–200 min | 10 mM NaCl, (1 mM NaCl+0.5 mM CaCl2+0.2 mM KCl), ‘maple sap’, 10 mM citric acid (pH 4), 10 mM citric acid (pH <3), formaldehyde (0.05%, 0.5%), gluteraldehyde (0.05%), 10 mM oxalic acid (pH 1.3–2.4) | |
| 25–75 | In and out | 0.2 and 0.1 μm filter | 2–14 | 150 kPa, both ends, up to 200 h | 10 mM oxalic acid | |
| 4–15 | Out* | 0.22 μm filter, degassed5 | 40 or 70 | 175 kPa, repeated flushes to | 10 mM oxalic acid | |
| 15–25 | Out* | 0.2 μm filter, not degassed5 | 10 | 175 kPa, no time info | HCl, pH 2 | |
| 10 | Out* | 0.1 μm filter, degassed | 3 | 175 kPa, 1 h | 10 mM citric acid | |
| 10 | Out* | 0.22 μm filter, not degassed5 | ≤10 | 100 kPa, repeated flushes to | HCl, pH 2 | |
| 14 | Out* | 0.2 μm filter, not degassed4 | –7 to –10, –3 for roots | 50–70 kPa, 30 min, | Deionized water | |
| 3–4 | In** | 0.2 μm filter, degassed | 3 | 100 kPa, no time info | Water | |
| 20 | In† | ? | –40 | N/A | Deionized water, 0.01–200 mM KCl, 6.7 mM K2SO4, 10 mM NaCl, 67 mM CaCl2, 20 mM mannitol, 20 mM melizitose | |
| 3–6 | Out | 0.2 μm filter, not degassed6 | 40 | 200 kPa, 10 min | Deionized water, 0.1–100 mM KCl, 10 mM sucrose, 10 mM ethanol, 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM KNO2, 10 mM CaCl2, 10 to 95% ethanol | |
| 10–15 | Out8 | 0.22 μm filter, degassed | 4.9 | 200 kPa, repeated 15 min flushes to | Distilled water | |
| 2 | In** | 0.2 μm filter, degassed2 | 1.5 | 150 kPa, no time info | 10 mM KCl | |
| 10–27 | Out* | 0.1 μm filter, degassed1 | 1.5–3.51 | 100 kPa, 1 h, | HCl, pH 2 | |
| Gascò | 1–36 | In** | 0.1 μmm filter | 9 | 190 kPa, 10 min | Deionized water, 5–150 mM KCl, 200 mM sucrose, 100 mM NaCl |
| Stems 14, roots: 27–59 | Out* | 0.2 μm filter, not degassed3 | 1.5–2 | 100 kPa, 15–20 min | Distilled water | |
| 22 | In† | Degassed and not degassed | –40 | –40 kPa 1.5 h, then 3.4–3 kPa 30 min | 0.7 mM CaCl2, 1.5 mM NaHCO3, 50 mM CuSO4 | |
| 7–13 | In† | ? | –20 | N/A | Ultrapure deionized water, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2+10 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2+10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2+100 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2+100 mM KCl, 0.1–100 mM KCl, 0.1–10 mM CaCl2 | |
| 6–16 | In** | 0.1 μm filter | 9 | 190 kPa, 10 min | Deionized water, 25 mM KCl, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 25 mM KCl+0.5 mM CaCl2, 25 mM KCl+1 mM CaCl2, mineral water | |
| Petioles 1, shoots 40, roots ? | In†† | 0.1 μm filter, degassed | Petioles 40; shoots 20; roots 10 | Petioles 600 kPa7; shoots 300 kPa7; roots 300 kPa7 | 15 mM KCl |
All studies were conducted at room temperature, except for Tyree and Yang (1992), which was conducted at 1–3 °C.
Apparatus used for hydraulic conductivity measurements: Sperry apparatus (Sperry ), **XYL'EM apparatus (Instrutec, Montigny les Cormeilles, France; Cochard ), †van Ieperen . ††Hydraulic conductance flow meter (model HCFM-XP, Dynamax, Houston, TX; Tyree ).
1Anna Jacobsen, personal communication; 2Hervé Cochard, personal communication; 3Hafiz Maherali, personal communication; 4Uwe Hacke personal communication; 5John Sperry, personal communication; 6Maciej Zwieniecki, personal communication; 7Pressure gradually increased to the maximum listed, Claudio Lovisolo personal communication; 8Sandra Bucci, personal communication.
Fig. 1.Effect of flushing time and flushing pressure on specific hydraulic conductance, ks, through stems of Encelia farinosa and Laurus nobilis when flushing with deionized, non-degassed water. Effects of species, pressure, time, and all their interactions on ks were tested with repeated measures ANOVA (Species: Sum of Squares (SS) 639.19, degrees of freedom (df) 1, F-ratio (F) 58.982, p-value (p) <0.001; pressure: SS 16.17, df 1, F 1.492, p 0.230; species×pressure: SS 35.68, df 1, F 3.292, p 0.078; time: SS 6.43, df 5, F 7.832, p <0.0001; time×species: SS 0.74, df 5, F 0.899, p 0.48313; time×pressure SS 3.486, df 5, F 4.247, p 0.001; time×species×pressure: SS 1.542, df 5, F 1.878, p 0.100). Slopes of linear trend-lines shown in the graph were significantly different from zero only in the 150 kPa treatments for both species.
Fig. 2.Comparison of inflow rates into plant stems of Encelia farinosa, Laurus nobilis, and a tubing control, measured with a XYL'EM apparatus (Cochard ) and simultaneous outflow rates from these samples measured with a Sperry apparatus (Sperry ). Significant differences (p <0.05) between inflow and outflow rates are designated by an asterisk.
Fig. 3.Effects of physical treatments on the specific hydraulic conductivity, ks, of fully hydrated Encelia and Laurus stems before high-pressure flushing (initial), after the first 3-min high-pressure flush, and after a second 3-min high-pressure flush. *Treatment applied during vase rehydration and during measurement.
Fig. 4.Effects of chemical treatments on the specific hydraulic conductivity, ks, of fully hydrated Encelia and Laurus stems before high-pressure flushing (initial), after the first 3-min high-pressure flush, and after a second 3-min high-pressure flush. *Treatment applied during vase rehydration and during measurement.
Fig. 5.Effects of treatments on the change in specific hydraulic conductivity ks (±95% confidence intervals) of fully hydrated Encelia and Laurus stems in response to high-pressure flushing. Values with 95% confidence intervals overlapping the zero-line are not significantly different from zero. Overall effects of treatments on change in ks were highly significant (sum of squares, SS=5,638.4, degrees of freedom, df=21, F-ratio=6.765, p <0.001), but differences in rates of change in ks between species were not (SS=59.457, df=1, F-ratio=1.498, p=0.222), nor were species×treatment interactions (SS=1,215.037, df=21, F-ratio=1.458, p=0.089).
Fig. 6.Effects of 24 h prehydration of submerged woody plant stems under 3 kPa (absolute pressure) vacuum on the change in specific hydraulic conductivity ks (±95% confidence intervals) in response to repeated high pressure flushing. Values with 95% confidence intervals overlapping the zero-line are not significantly different from zero. Multiple points for Laurus and Encelia stand for separate experiments.