Literature DB >> 21146772

Integration of short bouts of physical activity into organizational routine a systematic review of the literature.

Daheia J Barr-Anderson1, Mona AuYoung, Melicia C Whitt-Glover, Beth A Glenn, Antronette K Yancey.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Recommended daily physical activity accumulated in short intervals (e.g., <10 minutes) may be more feasible and appealing to the relatively sedentary populace than longer bouts. The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of the evidence for the effectiveness of short activity bouts incorporated into organizational routine as part of the regular "conduct of business." EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were searched in August 2009 (updated search in February and July 2010) to identify relevant, peer-reviewed journal articles and abstracts on school-, worksite-, and faith-based interventions of short, structurally integrated physical activity breaks. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The majority of interventions implemented daily physical activity bouts of 10-15 minutes in length. Schools were the most common settings among the 40 published articles included in this review. The rigor of the studies varied by setting, with more than 75% of worksite versus 25% of school studies utilizing RCT designs. Studies focused on a broad range of outcomes, including academic/work performance indicators, mental health outcomes, and clinical disease risk indicators, in addition to physical activity level. Physical activity was the most commonly assessed outcome in school-based studies, with more than half of studies assessing and observing improvements in physical activity outcomes following the intervention. About a quarter of worksite-based studies assessed physical activity, and the majority found a positive effect of the intervention on physical activity levels. About half of studies also observed improvements in other relevant outcomes such as academic and work performance indicators (e.g., academic achievement, cognitive performance, work productivity); psychosocial factors (e.g., stress, mood); and clinical disease risk indicators (e.g., blood pressure, BMI). The average study duration was more than 1 year, and several reported outcomes at 3-6 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions integrating physical activity into organizational routine during everyday life have demonstrated modest but consistent benefits, particularly for physical activity, and these are promising avenues of investigation. The proportionately longer-term outcomes available in these studies compared with individual-level studies suggest that physical activity promotion strategies at the organizational level may be more sustainable.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21146772     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  48 in total

1.  Implementing organizational physical activity and healthy eating strategies on paid time: process evaluation of the UCLA WORKING pilot study.

Authors:  Jammie M Hopkins; Beth A Glenn; Brian L Cole; William McCarthy; Antronette Yancey
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-02-09

Review 2.  Promoting health and wellness in the workplace: a unique opportunity to establish primary and extended secondary cardiovascular risk reduction programs.

Authors:  Ross Arena; Marco Guazzi; Paige D Briggs; Lawrence P Cahalin; Jonathan Myers; Leonard A Kaminsky; Daniel E Forman; Gerson Cipriano; Audrey Borghi-Silva; Abraham Samuel Babu; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Correlates of US adult physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns.

Authors:  Sydney A Jones; Fang Wen; Amy H Herring; Kelly R Evenson
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.319

4.  Booster Breaks in the workplace: participants' perspectives on health-promoting work breaks.

Authors:  Wendell C Taylor; Kathryn E King; Ross Shegog; Raheem J Paxton; Gina L Evans-Hudnall; David M Rempel; Vincent Chen; Antronette K Yancey
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2013-03-06

5.  Rural Active Living: A Call to Action.

Authors:  M Renée Umstattd Meyer; Justin B Moore; Christiaan Abildso; Michael B Edwards; Abigail Gamble; Monica L Baskin
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

6.  Understanding "agency" in the translation of a health promotion program.

Authors:  Janet Page-Reeves; Sally Davis; Camilla Romero; Eric Chrisp
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-01

7.  Effects of cycling workstation to get tertiary employee moving on their overall health: study protocol for a REMOVE trial.

Authors:  Terry Guirado; Lore Metz; Bruno Pereira; Audrey Bergouignan; David Thivel; Martine Duclos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Daily physical activities and sports in adult survivors of childhood cancer and healthy controls: a population-based questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Corina S Rueegg; Nicolas X von der Weid; Cornelia E Rebholz; Gisela Michel; Marcel Zwahlen; Michael Grotzer; Claudia E Kuehni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Policy brief on promoting physical activity among adolescents.

Authors:  Leila Mounesan; Mahdi Sepidarkish; Hamed Hosseini; Ayat Ahmadi; Gelayol Ardalan; Roya Kelishadi; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-09

10.  Influence of frequency and duration of strength training for effective management of neck and shoulder pain: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christoffer H Andersen; Lars L Andersen; Bibi Gram; Mogens Theisen Pedersen; Ole Steen Mortensen; Mette Kreutzfeldt Zebis; Gisela Sjøgaard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.