INTRODUCTION: For chronic disease prevention and management, brief but valid dietary assessment tools are needed to determine risk, guide counseling, and monitor progress in a variety of settings. Starting The Conversation (STC) is an eight-item simplified food frequency instrument designed for use in primary care and health-promotion settings. PURPOSE: This report investigates the feasibility, validity, and sensitivity to change of the STC tool, a simplified screener instrument for assessment and counseling. METHODS: Data from an ongoing practical efficacy study of type 2 diabetes patients in a diverse population (N=463) were used to document STC validity, robustness, stability, and sensitivity to change from baseline to 4 months. Data were collected from 2008 to 2010, and they were analyzed for this report in 2010. RESULTS: The eight STC items and summary score performed well. STC items and the summary score were moderately intercorrelated (r =0.39-0.59, p<0.05). The STC summary score was significantly correlated with the NCI fat screener at baseline (r =0.39, p<0.05), and change in the STC summary score correlated with reduction in percentage of calories from fat (r =0.22, p<0.05) from baseline to 4 months. The STC was sensitive to the intervention, with intervention participants improving significantly more than controls on the summary score (M=1.16 vs 0.46, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The brief STC is a relatively simple, valid, and efficient tool for dietary assessment and intervention in the clinical setting. It is available in English and Spanish and is in the public domain. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to assess its utility in other settings and with other dietary interventions.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: For chronic disease prevention and management, brief but valid dietary assessment tools are needed to determine risk, guide counseling, and monitor progress in a variety of settings. Starting The Conversation (STC) is an eight-item simplified food frequency instrument designed for use in primary care and health-promotion settings. PURPOSE: This report investigates the feasibility, validity, and sensitivity to change of the STC tool, a simplified screener instrument for assessment and counseling. METHODS: Data from an ongoing practical efficacy study of type 2 diabetespatients in a diverse population (N=463) were used to document STC validity, robustness, stability, and sensitivity to change from baseline to 4 months. Data were collected from 2008 to 2010, and they were analyzed for this report in 2010. RESULTS: The eight STC items and summary score performed well. STC items and the summary score were moderately intercorrelated (r =0.39-0.59, p<0.05). The STC summary score was significantly correlated with the NCI fat screener at baseline (r =0.39, p<0.05), and change in the STC summary score correlated with reduction in percentage of calories from fat (r =0.22, p<0.05) from baseline to 4 months. The STC was sensitive to the intervention, with intervention participants improving significantly more than controls on the summary score (M=1.16 vs 0.46, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The brief STC is a relatively simple, valid, and efficient tool for dietary assessment and intervention in the clinical setting. It is available in English and Spanish and is in the public domain. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to assess its utility in other settings and with other dietary interventions.
Authors: Matthew Lee Smith; Marcia G Ory; Luohua Jiang; Doris Howell; Shuai Chen; Jairus C Pulczinski; Suzanne M Swierc; Alan B Stevens Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Russell E Glasgow; Lawrence Fisher; Lisa A Strycker; Danielle Hessler; Deborah J Toobert; Diane K King; Tom Jacobs Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Brittany R Schuler; Baylie Fowler; Diana Rubio; Sarah Kilby; Yan Wang; Erin R Hager; Maureen M Black Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Joanna Buscemi; Angela Odoms-Young; Melinda L Stolley; Lara Blumstein; Linda Schiffer; Michael L Berbaum; Jennifer McCaffrey; Anastasia McGee Montoya; Carol Braunschweig; Marian L Fitzgibbon Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Katherine D Hoerster; Lamont Tanksley; Tracy Simpson; Brian E Saelens; Jürgen Unützer; Marissa Black; Preston Greene; Nadiyah Sulayman; Gayle Reiber; Karin Nelson Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2020-03-12
Authors: Julie Silverman; James Krieger; Meghan Kiefer; Paul Hebert; June Robinson; Karin Nelson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Hector P Rodriguez; Beth A Glenn; Tanya T Olmos; Alex H Krist; Stephanie L Shimada; Rodger Kessler; Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts; Roshan Bastani Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657