Literature DB >> 21146680

Diagnostic value of coronary artery calcium scoring in low-intermediate risk patients evaluated in the emergency department for acute coronary syndrome.

Leticia Fernandez-Friera1, Ana Garcia-Alvarez, Fatemeh Bagheriannejad-Esfahani, Waqas Malick, Jesus G Mirelis, Simonette T Sawit, Valentin Fuster, Javier Sanz, Mario J Garcia, Luke K Hermann.   

Abstract

Early and accurate triage of patients with possible ischemic chest pain remains challenging in the emergency department because current risk stratification techniques have significant cost and limited availability. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in low- to intermediate-risk patients evaluated in the emergency department for suspected acute coronary syndromes. A total of 225 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scores <4 who underwent non-contrast- and contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomographic angiography were included. CACS was calculated from the noncontrast scan using the Agatston method. The prevalence of obstructive CAD (defined from the contrast scan as ≥ 50% maximal reduction in luminal diameter in any segment) was 9% and increased significantly with higher scores (p <0.01 for trend). CACS of 0 were observed in 133 patients (59%), of whom only 2 (1.5%) had obstructive CAD. The diagnostic accuracy of CACS to detect obstructive CAD was good, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.88 and a negative predictive value of 99% for a CACS of 0. In a multivariate model, CACS was independently associated with obstructive CAD (odds ratio 7.01, p = 0.02) and provided additional diagnostic value over traditional CAD risk factors. In conclusion, CACS appears to be an effective initial tool for risk stratification of low- to intermediate-risk patients with possible acute coronary syndromes, on the basis of its high negative predictive value and additive diagnostic value.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21146680     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

1.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; S Richard Underwood; Roxy Senior; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: integration of new data, evolving views, revised goals, and role of rosuvastatin in management. A comprehensive survey.

Authors:  Richard Kones
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  The role of coronary CT in the assessment and diagnosis of patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Adam Wallis; Nathan Manghat; Mark Hamilton
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  Use of coronary artery calcium scanning beyond coronary computed tomographic angiography in the emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain: the ROMICAT II trial.

Authors:  Amit Pursnani; Eric T Chou; Pearl Zakroysky; Roderick C Deaño; Wilfred S Mamuya; Pamela K Woodard; John T Nagurney; Jerome L Fleg; Hang Lee; David Schoenfeld; James E Udelson; Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 6.  What is the role of calcium scoring in the age of coronary computed tomographic angiography?

Authors:  Parag H Joshi; Michael J Blaha; Roger S Blumenthal; Ron Blankstein; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Management in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.

Authors:  Daniel O Bittner; Thomas Mayrhofer; Fabian Bamberg; Travis R Hallett; Sumbal Janjua; Daniel Addison; John T Nagurney; James E Udelson; Michael T Lu; Quynh A Truong; Pamela K Woodard; Judd E Hollander; Chadwick Miller; Anna Marie Chang; Harjit Singh; Harold Litt; Udo Hoffmann; Maros Ferencik
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Coronary Artery Calcium Testing in Symptomatic Patients: An Issue of Diagnostic Efficiency.

Authors:  Chad B McBride; Michael K Cheezum; Rosco S Gore; Induruwa N Pathirana; Ahmad M Slim; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2013-06

Review 9.  Coronary CT and the coronary calcium score, the future of ED risk stratification?

Authors:  Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Ana Garcia-Alvarez; Gabriela Guzman; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-05

10.  Subclinical atherosclerosis in northern and southern China: the Chinese paradox.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Yang-Feng Wu; Xiao-Qing Liu; Ding Ding; Lian-Cheng Zhao; Bin Lu; Xian Li; Nathan D Wong; Laurie D Dustin; Stanley P Azen; Robert C Detrano
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.