Literature DB >> 21146230

Validity of two case finding questions to detect postnatal depression: a review of diagnostic test accuracy.

Rachel Mann1, Simon Gilbody.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postnatal depression (PND) is a serious condition associated with negative consequences for the wellbeing of mother and infant. In the UK routine screening for PND is not currently recommended, although the use of two case finding questions in routine practice to identify PND has been advocated in policy guidance. The diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of the two questions has been reviewed in general population samples; however a review of their validity in postnatal populations is unknown. The aim of this rapid review was to identify studies of DTA of two case finding questions (2CFQ) for PND detection.
METHODS: DTA studies were included which compared the 2CFQ to gold standard diagnostic criteria. Sources searched included Medline, PsychInfo, Medion, ARIF and cited reference search via Web of Science.
RESULTS: Seven studies were identified which used a two question instrument to detect PND. Only one study compared the 2CFQ to standardised diagnostic criteria in a USA postnatal population. The test reported 100% sensitivity and 62% specificity at 4 postnatal weeks. The test was excellent at 'ruling out' PND given a negative response to both questions. False positive rates were high indicating unnecessary follow-up for a substantial number of women.
CONCLUSION: The review found limited evidence for use of the 2CFQ approach to detect PND. Further primary research should be undertaken to assess the DTA of the 2CFQ approach recommended for use in UK postnatal populations; this will ultimately inform the utility of current UK policy guidance.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21146230     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression.

Authors:  Rachel Mann; Joy Adamson; Simon M Gilbody
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  A scoping review of rapid review methods.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Jesmin Antony; Wasifa Zarin; Lisa Strifler; Marco Ghassemi; John Ivory; Laure Perrier; Brian Hutton; David Moher; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Characteristics of stakeholder involvement in systematic and rapid reviews: a methodological review in the area of health services research.

Authors:  Jonas Feldmann; Milo Alan Puhan; Margot Mütsch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Should methodological filters for diagnostic test accuracy studies be used in systematic reviews of psychometric instruments? A case study involving screening for postnatal depression.

Authors:  Rachel Mann; Simon M Gilbody
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-09

5.  Identification of depression in women during pregnancy and the early postnatal period using the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: protocol for the Born and Bred in Yorkshire: PeriNatal Depression Diagnostic Accuracy (BaBY PaNDA) study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Littlewood; Shehzad Ali; Pat Ansell; Lisa Dyson; Samantha Gascoyne; Catherine Hewitt; Ada Keding; Rachel Mann; Dean McMillan; Deborah Morgan; Kelly Swan; Bev Waterhouse; Simon Gilbody
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Comparison of screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 using two case-identification methods during pregnancy and postpartum.

Authors:  Valerie Slavin; Debra K Creedy; Jenny Gamble
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.