Literature DB >> 21146056

Non-invasive hemodynamic assessment of non-pregnant, healthy pregnant and preeclamptic women using bioreactance. [corrected].

Yayoi Ohashi1, Hisham Ibrahim, Louis Furtado, John Kingdom, Jose Carlos Almeida Carvalho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared hemodynamic profiles of healthy and mildly preeclamptic pregnant women at term, as well as those of non-pregnant controls, using a new non-invasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM) based on bio-reactance.
METHODS: We studied healthy term pregnant women at term (Preg, n = 10), mildly preeclamptic pregnant women at term (PregPE, n = 10), and healthy non-pregnant female volunteers (NonPreg, n = 10). With the subjects in the semi left lateral position, 4 electrodes of the NICOM device were applied to their chest wall, followed by a 15-minute rest period. Hemodynamic variables, including the systolic (SBP), diastolic (DPB) and mean arterial (MAP) pressures, as well as the heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), total peripheral resistance (TPR), cardiac output (CO), cardiac power output (CPO), and ventricular ejection time (VET) were then monitored for 15 minutes.
RESULTS: The Preg and NonPreg groups showed similar hemodynamic profiles, except for a shorter VET in the Preg group (213.3 ± 19.3 ms versus 265.0 ± 28.8 ms, p < 0.001). The PregPE group showed higher SBP, DBP and MAP, as well as CPO (145.5 ± 12.6 mmHg; 94.5 ± 9.1 mmHg; 111.5 ± 9.8 mmHg; 1.6 ± 0.3 watts), compared to both the Preg (114 ± 12.1 mmHg; 71.7 ± 8.4 mmHg; 85.9 ± 9.3 mmHg; 1.1 ± 0.3 watts) and NonPreg (101.2 ± 11.9 mmHg; 66.7 ± 10.4 mmHg; 78.1 ± 10.6 mmHg; 1.0 ± 0.2 watts) groups. The PregPE group showed higher HR, CO, and TPR, and shorter VET (85.4 ± 8.4 beats.min⁻¹; 6.6 ± 0.7 L.min⁻¹; 1,369.9 ± 173.5 dyne.sec.cm⁻⁵, 221.6 ± 22.4 ms) compared to the NonPreg group (67.9 ± 9.5 beats.min⁻¹; 5.6 ± 0.7 L.min⁻¹; 1,136.9 ± 149.8 dyne.sec.cm⁻⁵, 265.0 ± 28.8 ms).
CONCLUSIONS: The NICOM device is simple to use, operator independent, and provides clear and consistent monitoring signals. The output identified distinct hemodymamic profiles that are consistent with the findings of more invasive existing methods.
© 2010 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21146056     DOI: 10.1016/S0034-7094(10)70075-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol        ISSN: 0034-7094            Impact factor:   0.964


  4 in total

1.  Applications of minimally invasive cardiac output monitors.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Gino Zadeii; Samuel Congello; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-24

2.  A prediction model for the response to oral labetalol for the treatment of antenatal hypertension.

Authors:  D Stott; M Bolten; M Salman; D Paraschiv; A Douiri; N A Kametas
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Influence of the prone position on a stretcher for pregnant women on maternal and fetal hemodynamic parameters and comfort in pregnancy.

Authors:  Claudia Oliveira; Marco Antonio Borges Lopes; Agatha Sacramento Rodrigues; Marcelo Zugaib; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Hemodynamic Assessment of Pregnant People with and without Obesity by Noninvasive Bioreactance: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ernesto A Figueiro-Filho; Na T S Robinson; Jose Carvalho; Johannes Keunen; Monique Robinson; Cynthia Maxwell
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2022-02-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.