Literature DB >> 21145777

Balancing incompatible endoprosthetic design goals: a combined ingrowth and bone remodeling simulation.

M Tarala1, D Janssen, N Verdonschot.   

Abstract

In order to design a good cementless femoral implant many requirements need to be fulfilled. For instance, the range of micromotions at the bone-implant interface should not exceed a certain threshold and a good ratio between implant-bone stiffness that does not cause bone resorption, needs to be ensured. Stiff implants are known to evoke lower interface micromotions but at the same time they may cause extensive resorption of the surrounding bone. Composite stems with reduced stiffness give good remodeling results but implant flexibility is likely to evoke high micromotions proximally. Finding a good balance between these incompatible design goals is very challenging. The current study proposes a finite element methodology that employs subsequent ingrowth and remodeling simulations and can be of assistance when designing new implants. The results of our simulations for the Epoch stem were in a good agreement with the clinical data. The proposed implant design made of porous tantalum with an inner CoCrMo core performed slightly better with respect to the Epoch stem and considerably better with respect to a Ti alloy stem. Our combined ingrowth and remodeling simulation can be a useful tool when designing a new implant that well balances mentioned incompatible design goals.
Copyright © 2010 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21145777     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  2 in total

1.  Computational tibial bone remodeling over a population after total knee arthroplasty: A comparative study.

Authors:  Thomas Anijs; Sanne Eemers; Yukihide Minoda; David Wolfson; Nico Verdonschot; Dennis Janssen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Computational modelling of bone augmentation in the spine.

Authors:  Sandro D Badilatti; Gisela A Kuhn; Stephen J Ferguson; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.191

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.