Literature DB >> 21145608

The extreme xerophilic mould Xeromyces bisporus--growth and competition at various water activities.

Su-Lin L Leong1, Olga Vinnere Pettersson, Therese Rice, Ailsa D Hocking, Johan Schnürer.   

Abstract

Little is known about the mould, Xeromyces bisporus, unique in its strong xerophilicity and ability to grow at water activity (a(w)) 0.62, lower than for any other known organism. The linear growth rates of one fast and one slow-growing strain of X. bisporus were assessed at 20, 25, 30 and 37 °C on solid agar media containing a mixture of glucose and fructose to reduce a(w) to 0.94, 0.88, 0.84, 0.80, 0.76 and 0.66. Growth rates of xerophilic species closely related to X. bisporus, viz. Chrysosporium inops, C. xerophilum and Monascus eremophilus, were also assessed. Optimal conditions for growth of both X. bisporus strains were approx. 0.84 a(w) and 30°C, despite FRR 2347 growing two- to five-fold faster than CBS 185.75. X. bisporus FRR 2347 even grew well at 0.66 a(w) (0.48 mm/day). C. inops and C. xerophilum were more tolerant of high a(w) than X. bisporus, and could be differentiated from each other based on: the faster growth of C. xerophilum; its preference for temperatures ≥ 30 °C and a(w) ≥ 0.94 (c.f.≤ 25 °C and ~0.88 a(w) for C. inops); and its ability to grow at 0.66 a(w), which is the lowest a(w) reported to date for this species. M. eremophilus grew slowly (max. 0.4mm/day) even in its optimal conditions of ~0.88 a(w) and 25 °C. To investigate the competitive characteristics of X. bisporus at low a(w), both X. bisporus strains were grown in dual-culture with xerotolerant species Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium roqueforti, and xerophilic species A. penicillioides, C. inops, C. xerophilum and Eurotium chevalieri, on glucose-fructose agar plates at 0.94, 0.84, 0.80 and 0.76 a(w) and at 25 °C. Growth rates and types of interactions were assessed. Excretion of inhibitory substances acting over a long-range was not observed by any species; inhibitors acting over a short-range that temporarily slowed competitors' growth or produced a protective zone around the colony were occasionally observed for A. penicillioides, C. inops and C. xerophilum. Instead, rapid growth relative to the competitor was the most common means of dominance. The xerotolerant species, A. flavus and P. roqueforti were dominant over X. bisporus at 0.94 a(w). E. chevalieri was often dominant due to its rapid growth over the entire a(w) range. At a(w)<0.80, X. bisporus was competitive because it grew faster than the other species examined. This supports the concept that its ideal environmental niche is sugary foods with low a(w).
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21145608     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  15 in total

Review 1.  The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds?

Authors:  Jonathan A Cray; Andrew N W Bell; Prashanth Bhaganna; Allen Y Mswaka; David J Timson; John E Hallsworth
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.813

2.  Classification of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and related genera (Eurotiales): An overview of families, genera, subgenera, sections, series and species.

Authors:  J Houbraken; S Kocsubé; C M Visagie; N Yilmaz; X-C Wang; M Meijer; B Kraak; V Hubka; K Bensch; R A Samson; J C Frisvad
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 16.097

3.  Fungal pollution of indoor environments and its management.

Authors:  A A Haleem Khan; S Mohan Karuppayil
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Isolation and Characterization of Halotolerant Soil Fungi from the Great Salt Plains of Oklahoma.

Authors:  Sarah Evans; Ryan W Hansen; Mark A Schneegurt
Journal:  Cryptogam Mycol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Xerochrysium gen. nov. and Bettsia, genera encompassing xerophilic species of Chrysosporium.

Authors:  John I Pitt; Henrik Lantz; Olga Vinnere Pettersson; Su-Lin L Leong
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.515

6.  Microbial Community Patterns Associated with Automated Teller Machine Keypads in New York City.

Authors:  Holly M Bik; Julia M Maritz; Albert Luong; Hakdong Shin; Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello; Jane M Carlton
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.389

7.  Phylogenetic analysis of Monascus and new species from honey, pollen and nests of stingless bees.

Authors:  R N Barbosa; S L Leong; O Vinnere-Pettersson; A J Chen; C M Souza-Motta; J C Frisvad; R A Samson; N T Oliveira; J Houbraken
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 16.097

Review 8.  Antifungal Microbial Agents for Food Biopreservation-A Review.

Authors:  Marcia Leyva Salas; Jérôme Mounier; Florence Valence; Monika Coton; Anne Thierry; Emmanuel Coton
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-07-08

9.  Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life?

Authors:  Andrew Stevenson; Jonathan A Cray; Jim P Williams; Ricardo Santos; Richa Sahay; Nils Neuenkirchen; Colin D McClure; Irene R Grant; Jonathan Dr Houghton; John P Quinn; David J Timson; Satish V Patil; Rekha S Singhal; Josefa Antón; Jan Dijksterhuis; Ailsa D Hocking; Bart Lievens; Drauzio E N Rangel; Mary A Voytek; Nina Gunde-Cimerman; Aharon Oren; Kenneth N Timmis; Terry J McGenity; John E Hallsworth
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 10.  Effect of climate change on Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin B1 production.

Authors:  Angel Medina; Alicia Rodriguez; Naresh Magan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.