Literature DB >> 21145093

Oncologic long-term outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma stage pT1b or greater in a matched-pair cohort.

Frederik C Roos1, Walburgis Brenner, Melanie Müller, Claudia Schubert, Wolfgang J Jäger, Joachim W Thüroff, Christian Hampel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the oncologic outcome and overall survival (OS) for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) >4 cm undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN) or elective nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in a matched-pair cohort.
METHODS: From 1988 to 2007, we identified 829 patients in our clinic treated with either RN (n = 641) or open NSS (n = 188) for renal masses >4 cm. After matching the cohort for age, time of surgery, grade, TNM stage, tumor size, and sex and excluding patients with metastases, benign lesions with an imperative indication, and those with missing records, 173 remained for oncologic analysis. OS, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The association with death was evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
RESULTS: At the last follow-up visit, 39 patients had died of any cause and 134 were alive at a median of 7.0 years. RN and elective NSS had been performed in 100 and 73 patients, respectively. The OS (P = .357), progression-free survival (P = .558), and cancer-specific survival (P = .239) were not significantly different between the elective NSS and RN groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. On univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, the type of surgery did not have an effect on OS (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.71-2.54, P = .359).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that it is oncologically safe to perform NSS for renal tumors >4 cm, for which the surgical feasibility according to the tumor location, rather than the tumor size, seemed to be the limiting factor.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21145093     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Renal cell carcinoma: what is new in 2010?].

Authors:  I Tsaur; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Minimally invasive vs. open surgical procedures in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  J W Thüroff; F Roos
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Renal function in the elderly after radical tumor nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy].

Authors:  S Mehralivand; C Thomas; C Hampel; J W Thüroff; F C Roos
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Two papillary renal cell carcinomas of different origin following renal transplantation (Case report).

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Gerth; Michele Pohlen; Nils-Heinrich Thoennissen; Barbara Suwelack; Hermann-Josef Pavenstädt; Stefan Störkel; Mahmoud Abbas; Tilmann Spieker; Gerold Thölking
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Stefanie Schmidt; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Arkadiusz Miernik; Philipp Dahm; Anne Cleves; Mario Walther; Nils Kroeger
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-09

6.  Oncological outcomes of minimally invasive partial versus minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for cT1-2/N0/M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Simone; Gabriele Tuderti; Umberto Anceschi; Rocco Papalia; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Leonardo Misuraca; Francesco Minisola; Riccardo Mastroianni; Manuela Costantini; Salvatore Guaglianone; Steno Sentinelli; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Bilateral synchronous sporadic renal masses: intermediate functional and oncological outcomes at a single institution.

Authors:  Benjamin Woodson; Raul Fernandez; Carrie Stewart; Sree Mandava; Liang Wang; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy for tumours larger than 4 cm: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tarek H El-Ghazaly; Ross J Mason; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Laparoscopic simple enucleation and coagulation on tumor bed using argon beam coagulator for treating small renal cell carcinomas: an animal study followed by clinical application.

Authors:  Changwen Zhang; Yong Xu; Zhihong Zhang; Baomin Qiao; Kuo Yang; Ranlu Liu; Baojie Ma
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-05

10.  Nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery - how to decide?

Authors:  Elżbieta Luczyńska; Sonia Dyczek; Sylwia Heinze-Paluchowska; Artur Komorowski; Tomasz Pawlik; Wojciech Wysocki; Małgorzata Klimek
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.