Literature DB >> 21144364

Content validation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for head and neck cancer: a multicentre study.

Uta Tschiesner1, Elisabeth Linseisen, Sven Becker, Gerson Mast, Simon N Rogers, Rohan R Walvekar, Alexander Berghaus, Alarcos Cieza.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for head and neck cancer (HNC) structure the assessment of functioning and guide rehabilitation. They are an application of the ICF that was adopted by the World Health Organization. They exist in a first version as a Comprehensive Core Set (CCS) with 112 categories for multidisciplinary assessment and clinical studies and as a Brief Core Set (BCS) with 19 categories for data collection in clinical routine. The BCS is a selection of the most important categories from the CCS. The objective of this study was to test whether the CCS and BCS are relevant in patients with HNC treated in different departments and countries across the world.
DESIGN: a multicentre, cross-sectional study was conducted with 276 patients at 14 international study-centres. Data collection included departments of otolaryngology, maxillofacial surgery, hemato-oncology, psychiatry, speech therapy, and physiotherapy.
METHODS: questionnaires on the CCS, the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL version 4), and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ) modules c30 and hn35 were completed by patients and health professionals. Frequency analyses and Spearman correlations were applied.
RESULTS: for the CCS, 105 of 112 categories (94%) were confirmed. New categories were not identified. For the BCS, 14 of 19 categories (74%) were confirmed, whereas several additional categories of the CCS have qualified for upgrading and inclusion in the BCS. Correlations between the UW-QOL and EORTC-QLQ (modules c30 and hn35) to the ICF-based data collection were satisfactory (mostly p < .01).
CONCLUSION: the CCS proved to be exhaustive and covers a broader range of aspects than any of the tested questionnaires. Final selection of categories out of the CCS into the BCS requires further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21144364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1916-0208


  12 in total

1.  Changing the perspective: current trends in the assessment of functional outcome in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Uta Tschiesner
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Assessment of functional outcomes in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Marita Stier-Jarmer; Carla Sabariego; Alarcos Cieza; Ulrich Harréus; Uta Tschiesner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Functional outcome in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: surgery and reconstruction with free flaps versus primary radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Uta Tschiesner; Lena Schuster; Sebastian Strieth; Ulrich Harréus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Priorities of head and neck cancer patients: a patient survey based on the brief ICF core set for HNC.

Authors:  Uta Tschiesner; Carla Sabariego; Elisabeth Linseisen; Sven Becker; Marita Stier-Jarmer; Alarcos Cieza; Ulrich Harreus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Evaluation of treatment- and disease-related symptoms in advanced head and neck cancer: validation of the national comprehensive cancer network-functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck cancer symptom index-22 (NFHNSI-22).

Authors:  Timothy P Pearman; Jennifer L Beaumont; Diane Paul; Amy P Abernethy; Paul B Jacobsen; Karen L Syrjala; Jamie Von Roenn; David Cella
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  The "Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Head and Neck Cancer": a Delphi consensus survey among German speaking speech and language therapists.

Authors:  Matthias Engelbarts; Vanessa Schuster; Ulrich Kisser; Carla Sabariego; Marita Stier-Jarmer; Michaela Coenen; Benjamin Philipp Ernst; Sebastian Strieth; Ulrich Harréus; Sven Becker
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  The development of an ICF-based clinical guideline and screening tool for the standardized assessment and evaluation of functioning after head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Ulrich Kisser; Christine Adderson-Kisser; Michaela Coenen; Marita Stier-Jarmer; Sven Becker; Carla Sabariego; Ulrich Harréus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  ICF, quality of life, and depression in breast cancer: perceived disability in disease-free women 6 months after mastectomy.

Authors:  Anna Giardini; Giardini Anna; Camilla Pisoni; Pisoni Camilla; Ines Giorgi; Giorgi Ines; Veronica Borelli; Borelli Veronica; Elisabetta Scoccia; Scoccia Elisabetta; Giuseppina Majani; Majani Giuseppina
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Preservation of organ function in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Uta Tschiesner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-12-20

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation after primary brain tumour treatment.

Authors:  Fary Khan; Bhasker Amatya; Louisa Ng; Kate Drummond; Mary Galea
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.