Lukar E Thornton1, David A Crawford, Kylie Ball. 1. Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. lukar.thornton@deakin.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Foods prepared outside of the home have been linked to less-than-ideal nutrient profiles for health. We examine whether the locations where meals are prepared and consumed are associated with socio-economic predictors among women. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study using self-reported data. We examined multiple locations where meals are prepared and consumed: (i) at home; (ii) fast food eaten at home; (iii) fast food eaten at the restaurant; (iv) total fast food; (v) non-fast-food restaurant meals eaten at home; (vi) non-fast-food restaurant meals eaten at the restaurant; and (vii) all non-fast-food restaurant meals. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine whether frequent consumption of meals from these sources varied by level of education, occupation, household income and area-level disadvantage. SETTING: Metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. SUBJECTS: A total of 1328 women from forty-five neighbourhoods randomly sampled for the SocioEconomic Status and Activity in Women study. RESULTS: Those with higher educational qualifications or who were not in the workforce (compared with those in professional employment) were more likely to report frequent consumption of meals prepared and consumed at home. High individual- and area-level socio-economic characteristics were associated with a lower likelihood of frequent consumption of fast food and a higher likelihood of frequent consumption of meals from non-fast-food sources. The strength and significance of relationships varied by place of consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The source of meal preparation and consumption varied by socio-economic predictors. This has implications for policy makers who need to continue to campaign to make healthy alternatives available in out-of-home food sources.
OBJECTIVE: Foods prepared outside of the home have been linked to less-than-ideal nutrient profiles for health. We examine whether the locations where meals are prepared and consumed are associated with socio-economic predictors among women. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study using self-reported data. We examined multiple locations where meals are prepared and consumed: (i) at home; (ii) fast food eaten at home; (iii) fast food eaten at the restaurant; (iv) total fast food; (v) non-fast-food restaurant meals eaten at home; (vi) non-fast-food restaurant meals eaten at the restaurant; and (vii) all non-fast-food restaurant meals. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine whether frequent consumption of meals from these sources varied by level of education, occupation, household income and area-level disadvantage. SETTING: Metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. SUBJECTS: A total of 1328 women from forty-five neighbourhoods randomly sampled for the SocioEconomic Status and Activity in Women study. RESULTS: Those with higher educational qualifications or who were not in the workforce (compared with those in professional employment) were more likely to report frequent consumption of meals prepared and consumed at home. High individual- and area-level socio-economic characteristics were associated with a lower likelihood of frequent consumption of fast food and a higher likelihood of frequent consumption of meals from non-fast-food sources. The strength and significance of relationships varied by place of consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The source of meal preparation and consumption varied by socio-economic predictors. This has implications for policy makers who need to continue to campaign to make healthy alternatives available in out-of-home food sources.
Authors: Zerleen S Quader; Lixia Zhao; Lisa J Harnack; Christopher D Gardner; James M Shikany; Lyn M Steffen; Cathleen Gillespie; Alanna Moshfegh; Mary E Cogswell Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Nicole Larson; Peter J Hannan; Jayne A Fulkerson; Melissa N Laska; Marla E Eisenberg; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: John R Speakman; David A Levitsky; David B Allison; Molly S Bray; John M de Castro; Deborah J Clegg; John C Clapham; Abdul G Dulloo; Laurence Gruer; Sally Haw; Johannes Hebebrand; Marion M Hetherington; Susanne Higgs; Susan A Jebb; Ruth J F Loos; Simon Luckman; Amy Luke; Vidya Mohammed-Ali; Stephen O'Rahilly; Mark Pereira; Louis Perusse; Tom N Robinson; Barbara Rolls; Michael E Symonds; Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.758
Authors: Tarra L Penney; Nicholas R V Jones; Jean Adams; Eva R Maguire; Thomas Burgoine; Pablo Monsivais Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sisitha Jayasinghe; Emily J Flies; Robert Soward; Dave Kendal; Michelle Kilpatrick; Timothy P Holloway; Kira A E Patterson; Kiran D K Ahuja; Roger Hughes; Nuala M Byrne; Andrew P Hills Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-12-01
Authors: Rachel Pechey; Susan A Jebb; Michael P Kelly; Eva Almiron-Roig; Susana Conde; Ryota Nakamura; Ian Shemilt; Marc Suhrcke; Theresa M Marteau Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 4.634