Literature DB >> 21143603

The influence of oxygen depletion and photosensitizer triplet-state dynamics during photodynamic therapy on accurate singlet oxygen luminescence monitoring and analysis of treatment dose response.

Mark T Jarvi1, Mark J Niedre, Michael S Patterson, Brian C Wilson.   

Abstract

To date, singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)) luminescence (SOL) detection was predictive of photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment responses both in vitro and in vivo, but accurate quantification is challenging. In particular, the early and strongest part of the time-resolved signal (500-2000ns) is difficult to separate from confounding sources of luminescence and system noise, and so is normally gated out. However, the signal dynamics change with oxygen depletion during PDT, so that this time gating biases the (1)O(2) measurements. Here, the impact of gating was investigated in detail, determining the rate constants from SOL and direct pO(2) measurements during meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC)-mediated PDT of cells in vitro under well-controlled conditions. With these data as input, numerical simulations were used to examine PDT and SOL dynamics, and the influence of various time gates on cumulative SOL signals. It is shown that gating can underestimate the SOL at early treatment time points by ∼40% and underestimate the cumulative SOL signal by 20-25%, representing significant errors. In vitro studies with both mTHPC and aminolevulinic acid-photosensitizer protoporphyrin IX demonstrate that rigorous analysis of SOL signal kinetics is then crucial in order to use SOL as an accurate and quantitative PDT dose metric.
© 2010 The Authors. Photochemistry and Photobiology © 2010 The American Society of Photobiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21143603     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00851.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  7 in total

1.  Insights into photodynamic therapy dosimetry: simultaneous singlet oxygen luminescence and photosensitizer photobleaching measurements.

Authors:  Mark T Jarvi; Michael S Patterson; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Advances in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Nasim Kashef; Ying-Ying Huang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanophotonics       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 8.449

Review 3.  On the in vivo photochemical rate parameters for PDT reactive oxygen species modeling.

Authors:  Michele M Kim; Ashwini A Ghogare; Alexander Greer; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Temporal profile of the singlet oxygen emission endogenously produced by photosystem II reaction centre in an aqueous buffer.

Authors:  Heng Li; Thor Bernt Melø; Juan B Arellano; K Razi Naqvi
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A europium(III)-based PARACEST agent for sensing singlet oxygen by MRI.

Authors:  Bo Song; Yunkou Wu; Mengxiao Yu; Piyu Zhao; Chen Zhou; Garry E Kiefer; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.390

6.  Effective near-infrared photodynamic therapy assisted by upconversion nanoparticles conjugated with photosensitizers.

Authors:  Qing Qing Dou; Choon Peng Teng; Enyi Ye; Xian Jun Loh
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-01-08

7.  A Comparison of Singlet Oxygen Explicit Dosimetry (SOED) and Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Dosimetry (SOLD) for Photofrin-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Michele M Kim; Rozhin Penjweini; Nathan R Gemmell; Israel Veilleux; Aongus McCarthy; Gerald S Buller; Robert H Hadfield; Brian C Wilson; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.