Literature DB >> 21143545

The economic consequences of deinstitutionalisation of mental health services: lessons from a systematic review of European experience.

Martin Knapp1, Jennifer Beecham, David McDaid, Tihana Matosevic, Monique Smith.   

Abstract

Many European mental health systems are undergoing change as community-centred care replaces large-scale institutions. We review empirical evidence from three countries (UK, Germany, Italy) that have made good progress with this rebalancing of care. We focus particularly on the economic consequences of deinstitutionalisation. A systematic literature review was conducted using a broad search strategy in accordance with established guidelines. We searched the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Health Management Information Consortium, British Nursing Index and PUBMED/Medline to 2008. The on-line search was supplemented by advice and assistance from contacts with government departments, European Commission, professional networks and known local experts. Community-based models of care are not inherently more costly than institutions, once account is taken of individuals' needs and the quality of care. New community-based care arrangements could be more expensive than long-stay hospital care but may still be seen as more cost-effective because, when properly set up and managed, they deliver better outcomes. Understanding the economic consequences of deinstitutionalisation is fundamental to success. Local stakeholders and budget controllers need to be aware of the underlying policy and operational plan. Joint planning and commissioning or devolving certain powers and responsibilities to care managers may aid development of effective and cost-effective care. People's needs, preferences and circumstances vary, and so their service requirements and support costs also vary, opening up the possibility for purposive targeting of services on needs to improve the ability of a care system to improve well-being from constrained resources. As the institutional/community balance shifts, strategic planning should also ensure that the new care arrangements address the specific contexts of different patient groups. Decision-makers have to plan a dynamic community-based system to match the needs of people moving from institutions, and must take the long view.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21143545     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00969.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  18 in total

Review 1.  EPA guidance on mental health and economic crises in Europe.

Authors:  M Martin-Carrasco; S Evans-Lacko; G Dom; N G Christodoulou; J Samochowiec; E González-Fraile; P Bienkowski; M Gómez-Beneyto; M J H Dos Santos; D Wasserman
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Actions to alleviate the mental health impact of the economic crisis.

Authors:  Kristian Wahlbeck; David McDaid
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  The CZEch Mental health Study (CZEMS): Study rationale, design, and methods.

Authors:  Petr Winkler; Tomáš Formánek; Karolína Mladá; Pavla Cermakova
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  [Health economic evaluation of community-based psychiatric interventions].

Authors:  R Kilian
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Quality of longer term mental health facilities in Europe: validation of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care against service users' views.

Authors:  Helen Killaspy; Sarah White; Christine Wright; Tatiana L Taylor; Penny Turton; Thomas Kallert; Mirjam Schuster; Jorge A Cervilla; Paulette Brangier; Jiri Raboch; Lucie Kalisova; Georgi Onchev; Spiridon Alexiev; Roberto Mezzina; Pina Ridente; Durk Wiersma; Ellen Visser; Andrzej Kiejna; Patryk Piotrowski; Dimitris Ploumpidis; Fragiskos Gonidakis; José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida; Graça Cardoso; Michael King
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Institutionalization of deinstitutionalization: a cross-national analysis of mental health system reform.

Authors:  Gordon C Shen; Lonnie R Snowden
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2014-11-22

7.  Identifying Local and Centralized Mental Health Services-The Development of a New Categorizing Variable.

Authors:  Taina Ala-Nikkola; Sami Pirkola; Minna Kaila; Grigori Joffe; Raija Kontio; Olli Oranta; Minna Sadeniemi; Kristian Wahlbeck; Samuli I Saarni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Adherence to the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities in Czech Psychiatric Hospitals: A Nationwide Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Petr Winkler; Lucie Kondrátová; Anna Kagstrom; Matěj Kučera; Tereza Palánová; Marie Salomonová; Petr Šturma; Zbyněk Roboch; Melita Murko
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2020-06

9.  Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial.

Authors:  Annabel Sandra Stierlin; Katrin Herder; Marina Julia Helmbrecht; Stefanie Prinz; Julia Walendzik; Marco Holzmann; Thomas Becker; Matthias Schützwohl; Reinhold Kilian
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial.

Authors:  Annabel Sandra Mueller-Stierlin; Marina Julia Helmbrecht; Katrin Herder; Stefanie Prinz; Nadine Rosenfeld; Julia Walendzik; Marco Holzmann; Uemmueguelsuem Dinc; Matthias Schützwohl; Thomas Becker; Reinhold Kilian
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.